<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TanyaPetach</id>
	<title>coloradoriverscience.org - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TanyaPetach"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/Special:Contributions/TanyaPetach"/>
	<updated>2026-07-25T15:27:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4572</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4572"/>
		<updated>2026-07-24T00:24:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on July 11, 2025. (Photo: National Park Service/M. Quinn)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watersheds across the western United States are being increasingly impacted by wildfires. Since 2000, West-wide average annual burned area has more than doubled, and the number of &amp;quot;megafires&amp;quot; (&amp;gt;100,000 acres) has increased from about one per year to over five per year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In general, recent wildfires have also spread faster, burned at higher overall severity, and burned at higher average elevations than in the 1980s and 1990s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In the Colorado River Basin, many large high-severity wildfires have impacted runoff-generating watersheds (Table 1, below), from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of Arizona (Figure 1) and New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity in the past several decades have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation due to anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more opportunities for ignition during periods of high fire danger.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, plant water use, soil infiltration, and overall runoff efficiency, and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water supply impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Plant water use====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil infiltration and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among these contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Land management to reduce fire risk and impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire have been used for many years to reduce the risk of high-severity fires, particularly in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These treatments can also improve snowpack retention&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and may modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply are uncertain and dependent on many local factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Several water providers, including [https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6ef2af96207046baa8451cf20def46cb Denver Water] and [https://www.srpnet.com/grid-water-management/water-management/watershed Salt River Project], have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, it has been recognized that stream and wetland restoration can bring substantial co-benefits for wildfire mitigation. Restoring the water- and sediment-retention functions of riparian and wetland areas and enlarging their footprint on the landscape can slow fire spread through &amp;quot;wet fuel breaks&amp;quot;, reduce burn severity, and alleviate post-fire impacts on water quality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These restoration techniques, collectively called process-based restoration (PBR), include beaver reintroduction, emplacing logs and wood structures in stream channels such as beaver-dam analogs (BDAs), riparian plantings, meadow restoration, and, when necessary, earthmoving to reestablish natural channels and stream connectivity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many PBR projects in the basin are supported by water agencies, in collaboration with land managers and environmental NGOs. For example, the [https://www.kvcollab.org/ Kawuneeche Valley Restoration Collaborative] (KVRC) in the Colorado River headwaters in north-central Colorado receives direct funding and staff involvement from Northern Water as well as grants from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado River District, and Reclamation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted the basin&#039;s water resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101294&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243533&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031569&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.971271&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15871&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126086&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0602001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02775.x&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125364&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1460508&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16995&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00185-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.379&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030699&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.043&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00670&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EW00247A&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977. https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-103&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609798104&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2014.106.0055&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01066.x&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Juang, C. S., &amp;amp; Short, K. C. (2025). The Western United States MTBS-Interagency database of large wildfires, 1984–2024 (WUMI2024a). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17(12), 7359–7372. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7359-2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., Holsinger, L. M., Blankenship, K., Dillon, G. K., Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Swaty, R. (2023). Contemporary wildfires are more severe compared to the historical reference period in western US dry conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 544, 121232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121232&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Boisramé, G. F. S., Brown, T. J., &amp;amp; Bachelet, D. M. (2022). Trends in western USA fire fuels using historical data and modeling. Fire Ecology, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00129-4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Higuera, P. E., Cook, M. C., Balch, J. K., Stavros, E. N., Mahood, A. L., &amp;amp; St. Denis, L. A. (2023). Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires. PNAS Nexus, 2(3), pgad005. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., &amp;amp; Abatzoglou, J. T. (2020). Warmer and Drier Fire Seasons Contribute to Increases in Area Burned at High Severity in Western US Forests From 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089858&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Davis, K. T., Peeler, J., Fargione, J., Haugo, R. D., Metlen, K. L., Robles, M. D., &amp;amp; Woolley, T. (2024). Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US. Forest Ecology and Management, 561, 121885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121885&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., &amp;amp; Schwilk, D. W. (2012). The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Broxton, P. D., Biederman, J. A., Dwivedi, R., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., Sankey, T. Ts., Woolley, T., &amp;amp; Svoma, B. M. (2025). Forest Patch Geometry and Climate Regulate the Impact of Forest Thinning on Snowpack in the Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 18(6), e70111. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2022). Variable Streamflow Response to Forest Disturbance in the Western US: A Large‐Sample Hydrology Approach. Water Resources Research, 58(6), e2021WR031575. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031575&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lumbrazo, C., Howe, E. R., Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Pestana, S., Cramblitt, J., Dedinsky, K., Smith, K., &amp;amp; Lundquist, J. D. (2026). Can we maximize snow storage through fire-resilient forest treatments? Insights from experimental forest treatments in the Eastern Cascades, WA, USA. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8, 1707812. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1707812&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gillespie, N.; Adams, P.; Croft, J.; Flitcroft, R.; Hogervorst, J.; Powers, P., &amp;amp; Callery, D. (2026). Integrating watershed restoration in wildfire management: opportunities, approaches, and examples. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 20 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/watershed-restoration-in-wildfire.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beechie, Timothy J.; Sear, David A.; Olden, Julian D.; Pess, George R.; Buffington, John M.; Moir, Hamish; Roni, Philip, &amp;amp; Pollock, Michael M. (2010). Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 60(3): 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4571</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4571"/>
		<updated>2026-07-24T00:18:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on July 11, 2025. (Photo: National Park Service/M. Quinn)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watersheds across the western United States are being increasingly impacted by wildfires. Since 2000, West-wide average annual burned area has more than doubled, and the number of &amp;quot;megafires&amp;quot; (&amp;gt;100,000 acres) has increased from about one per year to over five per year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In general, recent wildfires have also spread faster, burned at higher overall severity, and burned at higher average elevations than in the 1980s and 1990s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In the Colorado River Basin, many large high-severity wildfires have impacted runoff-generating watersheds (Table 1, below), from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of Arizona (Figure 1) and New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity in the past several decades have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation due to anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more opportunities for ignition during periods of high fire danger.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, plant water use, soil infiltration, and overall runoff efficiency, and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water supply impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Plant water use====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil infiltration and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among these contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Land management to reduce fire risk and impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire have been used for many years to reduce the risk of high-severity fires, particularly in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These treatments can also improve snowpack retention&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and may modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply are uncertain and dependent on many local factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Several water providers, including [https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6ef2af96207046baa8451cf20def46cb Denver Water] and [https://www.srpnet.com/grid-water-management/water-management/watershed Salt River Project], have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, it has been recognized that stream and wetland restoration can bring substantial co-benefits for wildfire mitigation. Restoring the water- and sediment-retention functions of riparian and wetland areas and enlarging their footprint on the landscape can slow fire spread through &amp;quot;wet fuel breaks&amp;quot;, reduce burn severity, and alleviate post-fire impacts on water quality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These restoration techniques, collectively called process-based restoration (PBR), include beaver reintroduction, emplacing logs and wood structures in stream channels such as beaver-dam analogs (BDAs), riparian plantings, meadow restoration, and, when necessary, earthmoving to reestablish natural channels and stream connectivity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many PBR projects in the basin are supported by water agencies, in collaboration with land managers and environmental NGOs. For example, the [https://www.kvcollab.org/ Kawuneeche Valley Restoration Collaborative] (KVRC) in the Colorado River headwaters in north-central Colorado receives direct funding and staff involvement from Northern Water as well as grants from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado River District, and Reclamation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted the basin&#039;s water resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Juang, C. S., &amp;amp; Short, K. C. (2025). The Western United States MTBS-Interagency database of large wildfires, 1984–2024 (WUMI2024a). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17(12), 7359–7372. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7359-2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., Holsinger, L. M., Blankenship, K., Dillon, G. K., Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Swaty, R. (2023). Contemporary wildfires are more severe compared to the historical reference period in western US dry conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 544, 121232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121232&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Boisramé, G. F. S., Brown, T. J., &amp;amp; Bachelet, D. M. (2022). Trends in western USA fire fuels using historical data and modeling. Fire Ecology, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00129-4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Higuera, P. E., Cook, M. C., Balch, J. K., Stavros, E. N., Mahood, A. L., &amp;amp; St. Denis, L. A. (2023). Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires. PNAS Nexus, 2(3), pgad005. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., &amp;amp; Abatzoglou, J. T. (2020). Warmer and Drier Fire Seasons Contribute to Increases in Area Burned at High Severity in Western US Forests From 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089858&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Davis, K. T., Peeler, J., Fargione, J., Haugo, R. D., Metlen, K. L., Robles, M. D., &amp;amp; Woolley, T. (2024). Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US. Forest Ecology and Management, 561, 121885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121885&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., &amp;amp; Schwilk, D. W. (2012). The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Broxton, P. D., Biederman, J. A., Dwivedi, R., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., Sankey, T. Ts., Woolley, T., &amp;amp; Svoma, B. M. (2025). Forest Patch Geometry and Climate Regulate the Impact of Forest Thinning on Snowpack in the Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 18(6), e70111. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2022). Variable Streamflow Response to Forest Disturbance in the Western US: A Large‐Sample Hydrology Approach. Water Resources Research, 58(6), e2021WR031575. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031575&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lumbrazo, C., Howe, E. R., Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Pestana, S., Cramblitt, J., Dedinsky, K., Smith, K., &amp;amp; Lundquist, J. D. (2026). Can we maximize snow storage through fire-resilient forest treatments? Insights from experimental forest treatments in the Eastern Cascades, WA, USA. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8, 1707812. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1707812&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gillespie, N.; Adams, P.; Croft, J.; Flitcroft, R.; Hogervorst, J.; Powers, P., &amp;amp; Callery, D. (2026). Integrating watershed restoration in wildfire management: opportunities, approaches, and examples. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 20 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/watershed-restoration-in-wildfire.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beechie, Timothy J.; Sear, David A.; Olden, Julian D.; Pess, George R.; Buffington, John M.; Moir, Hamish; Roni, Philip, &amp;amp; Pollock, Michael M. (2010). Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 60(3): 209-222. https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/34786.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4570</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4570"/>
		<updated>2026-07-24T00:18:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on July 11, 2025. (Photo: National Park Service/M. Quinn)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watersheds across the western United States are being increasingly impacted by wildfires. Since 2000, West-wide average annual burned area has more than doubled, and the number of &amp;quot;megafires&amp;quot; (&amp;gt;100,000 acres) has increased from about one per year to over five per year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In general, recent wildfires have also spread faster, burned at higher overall severity, and burned at higher average elevations than in the 1980s and 1990s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In the Colorado River Basin, many large high-severity wildfires have impacted runoff-generating watersheds (Table 1, below), from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of Arizona (Figure 1) and New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity in the past several decades have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation due to anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more opportunities for ignition during periods of high fire danger.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, plant water use, soil infiltration, and overall runoff efficiency, and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water supply impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Plant water use====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil infiltration and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among these contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Land management to reduce fire risk and impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire have been used for many years to reduce the risk of high-severity fires, particularly in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These treatments can also improve snowpack retention&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and may modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply are uncertain and dependent on many local factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Several water providers, including [https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6ef2af96207046baa8451cf20def46cb Denver Water] and [https://www.srpnet.com/grid-water-management/water-management/watershed Salt River Project], have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, it has been recognized that stream and wetland restoration can bring substantial co-benefits for wildfire mitigation. Restoring the water- and sediment-retention functions of riparian and wetland areas and enlarging their footprint on the landscape can slow fire spread through &amp;quot;wet fuel breaks&amp;quot;, reduce burn severity, and alleviate post-fire impacts on water quality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These restoration techniques, collectively called process-based restoration (PBR), include beaver reintroduction, emplacing logs and wood structures in stream channels such as beaver-dam analogs (BDAs), riparian plantings, meadow restoration, and, when necessary, earthmoving to reestablish natural channels and stream connectivity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many PBR projects in the basin are supported by water agencies, in collaboration with land managers and environmental NGOs. For example, the [https://www.kvcollab.org/ Kawuneeche Valley Restoration Collaborative] (KVRC) in the Colorado River headwaters in north-central Colorado receives direct funding and staff involvement from Northern Water as well as grants from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado River District, and Reclamation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted the basin&#039;s water resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Juang, C. S., &amp;amp; Short, K. C. (2025). The Western United States MTBS-Interagency database of large wildfires, 1984–2024 (WUMI2024a). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17(12), 7359–7372. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7359-2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., Holsinger, L. M., Blankenship, K., Dillon, G. K., Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Swaty, R. (2023). Contemporary wildfires are more severe compared to the historical reference period in western US dry conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 544, 121232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121232&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Boisramé, G. F. S., Brown, T. J., &amp;amp; Bachelet, D. M. (2022). Trends in western USA fire fuels using historical data and modeling. Fire Ecology, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00129-4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Higuera, P. E., Cook, M. C., Balch, J. K., Stavros, E. N., Mahood, A. L., &amp;amp; St. Denis, L. A. (2023). Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires. PNAS Nexus, 2(3), pgad005. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., &amp;amp; Abatzoglou, J. T. (2020). Warmer and Drier Fire Seasons Contribute to Increases in Area Burned at High Severity in Western US Forests From 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089858&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Davis, K. T., Peeler, J., Fargione, J., Haugo, R. D., Metlen, K. L., Robles, M. D., &amp;amp; Woolley, T. (2024). Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US. Forest Ecology and Management, 561, 121885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121885&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., &amp;amp; Schwilk, D. W. (2012). The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;broxton2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Broxton, P. D., Biederman, J. A., Dwivedi, R., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., Sankey, T. Ts., Woolley, T., &amp;amp; Svoma, B. M. (2025). Forest Patch Geometry and Climate Regulate the Impact of Forest Thinning on Snowpack in the Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 18(6), e70111. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;goeking2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Tarboton, D. G. (2022). Variable Streamflow Response to Forest Disturbance in the Western US: A Large‐Sample Hydrology Approach. Water Resources Research, 58(6), e2021WR031575. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031575&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lumbrazo2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lumbrazo, C., Howe, E. R., Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Pestana, S., Cramblitt, J., Dedinsky, K., Smith, K., &amp;amp; Lundquist, J. D. (2026). Can we maximize snow storage through fire-resilient forest treatments? Insights from experimental forest treatments in the Eastern Cascades, WA, USA. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8, 1707812. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1707812&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gillespie2026&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gillespie, N.; Adams, P.; Croft, J.; Flitcroft, R.; Hogervorst, J.; Powers, P., &amp;amp; Callery, D. (2026). Integrating watershed restoration in wildfire management: opportunities, approaches, and examples. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 20 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/watershed-restoration-in-wildfire.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beechie2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beechie, Timothy J.; Sear, David A.; Olden, Julian D.; Pess, George R.; Buffington, John M.; Moir, Hamish; Roni, Philip, &amp;amp; Pollock, Michael M. (2010). Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 60(3): 209-222. https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/34786.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4555</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4555"/>
		<updated>2026-07-20T20:39:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on July 11, 2025. (Photo: National Park Service/M. Quinn)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watersheds across the western United States are being increasingly impacted by wildfires. Since 2000, West-wide average annual burned area has more than doubled, and the number of &amp;quot;megafires&amp;quot; (&amp;gt;100,000 acres) has increased from about one per year to over five per year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Overall, wildfires are also spreading faster, burning at higher overall severity, and at higher average elevations than in the 1980s and 1990s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In the Colorado River Basin, many large high-severity wildfires have impacted runoff-generating watersheds (Table 1, below), from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of Arizona (Figure 1) and New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity in the past several decades have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation due to anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and many more ignition opportunities.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, plant water use, soil infiltration, and overall runoff efficiency, and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted the basin&#039;s water resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water supply impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Plant water use====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil infiltration and runoff====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among these contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Land management to reduce fire risk and impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire have been used for many years to reduce the risk of high-severity fires, particularly in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply  are uncertain. Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, it has been recognized that stream and wetland restoration can bring substantial co-benefits for wildfire mitigation. Restoring the water- and sediment-retention functions of riparian and wetland areas and enlarging their footprint on the landscape can slow fire spread through &amp;quot;wet fuel breaks&amp;quot;, reduce burn severity, and alleviate post-fire impacts on water quality. These restoration techniques, collectively called process-based restoration (PBR), include beaver reintroduction, emplacing logs and wood structures in stream channels such as beaver-dam analogs (BDAs), riparian plantings, meadow restoration, and, when necessary, earthmoving to reestablish natural channels and stream connectivity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PBR projects in the basin are often supported by water agencies in collaboration with land managers and environmental NGOs. For example, the Kawuneeche Valley Restoration Collaborative (KVRC) in the Colorado River headwaters in north-central Colorado receives direct funding and staff involvement from Northern Water as well as grants from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado River District, and Reclamation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2025&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Juang, C. S., &amp;amp; Short, K. C. (2025). The Western United States MTBS-Interagency database of large wildfires, 1984–2024 (WUMI2024a). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17(12), 7359–7372. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7359-2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., Holsinger, L. M., Blankenship, K., Dillon, G. K., Goeking, S. A., &amp;amp; Swaty, R. (2023). Contemporary wildfires are more severe compared to the historical reference period in western US dry conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 544, 121232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121232&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;boisrame2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Boisramé, G. F. S., Brown, T. J., &amp;amp; Bachelet, D. M. (2022). Trends in western USA fire fuels using historical data and modeling. Fire Ecology, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00129-4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;higuera2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Higuera, P. E., Cook, M. C., Balch, J. K., Stavros, E. N., Mahood, A. L., &amp;amp; St. Denis, L. A. (2023). Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires. PNAS Nexus, 2(3), pgad005. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;parks2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Parks, S. A., &amp;amp; Abatzoglou, J. T. (2020). Warmer and Drier Fire Seasons Contribute to Increases in Area Burned at High Severity in Western US Forests From 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089858&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;davis2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Davis, K. T., Peeler, J., Fargione, J., Haugo, R. D., Metlen, K. L., Robles, M. D., &amp;amp; Woolley, T. (2024). Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US. Forest Ecology and Management, 561, 121885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121885&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stephens2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., &amp;amp; Schwilk, D. W. (2012). The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4528</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4528"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:32:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4527</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4527"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:31:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review of post-wildfire shifts in streamflow]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4526</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4526"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:31:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3033-4942/ae2a64/meta A review and synthesis of post-wildfire shifts in hydrologic processes and streamflow generation mechanisms]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4525</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4525"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:30:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4524</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4524"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:29:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4523</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4523"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:26:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4522</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4522"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:26:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4521</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4521"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:25:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., Adamowski, J. F., Farid, A., &amp;amp; Sadegh, M. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4520</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4520"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:23:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh et al. (2021).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4519</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4519"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:22:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Wine, M. L., &amp;amp; Cadol, D. (2016). &#039;&#039;Hydrologic effects of large southwestern USA wildfires significantly increase regional water supply: Fact or fiction?&#039;&#039; Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 085006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Mataix-Solera, J., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2004). &#039;&#039;Hydrophobicity and aggregate stability in calcareous topsoils from fire-affected pine forests in southeastern Spain.&#039;&#039; Geoderma, 118(1–2), 77–88.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huffman, E. L., MacDonald, L. H., &amp;amp; Stednick, J. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Strength and persistence of fire-induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2877–2892.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Shakesby, R. A., &amp;amp; Doerr, S. H. (2006). &#039;&#039;Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent.&#039;&#039; Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., Hansen, W. D., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., ... &amp;amp; Lettenmaier, D. P. (2022). &#039;&#039;Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., &amp;amp; Breshears, D. D. (2001). &#039;&#039;Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance.&#039;&#039; Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2917–2930.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., &amp;amp; Leibowitz, S. G. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire induces changes in receiving waters: A review with considerations for water quality management.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(9), e2021WR030699.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N., Nyman, P., &amp;amp; Haydon, S. (2011). &#039;&#039;Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 396(1–2), 170–192.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkerson, P., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2019). &#039;&#039;Wildfires alter forest watersheds and threaten drinking water quality.&#039;&#039; Accounts of Chemical Research, 52(5), 1234–1244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hohner, A. K., Terry, L. G., Townsend, E. B., Summers, R. S., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2017). &#039;&#039;Water treatment process evaluation of wildfire-affected sediment leachates.&#039;&#039; Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 3(2), 352–365.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Burton, C. A., Hoefen, T. M., Plumlee, G. S., Baumberger, K. L., Backlin, A. R., Gallegos, E., &amp;amp; Fisher, R. N. (2016). &#039;&#039;Trace elements in stormflow, ash, and burned soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.&#039;&#039; PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0153372.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., &amp;amp; Zhang, W. (2005). &#039;&#039;Methyl mercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates and fish from burned and undisturbed lakes on the Boreal Plain.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(9), 1963–1977.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., &amp;amp; Vladicka, K. E. (2006). &#039;&#039;Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19380–19385.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., Bladon, K. D., &amp;amp; Stone, M. (2011). &#039;&#039;Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for &amp;quot;source water supply and protection&amp;quot; strategies.&#039;&#039; Water Research, 45(2), 461–472.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Writer, J. H., Hohner, A., Oropeza, J., Schmidt, A., Cawley, K. M., &amp;amp; Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. (2014). &#039;&#039;Water treatment implications after the High Park wildfire, Colorado.&#039;&#039; Journal ‐ American Water Works Association, 106(4), E189–E199.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Earl, S. R., &amp;amp; Blinn, D. W. (2003). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in south-western USA streams.&#039;&#039; Freshwater Biology, 48(6), 1015–1030.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rust, A. J., Saxe, S., McCray, J., Rhoades, C. C., &amp;amp; Hogue, T. S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Evaluating the factors responsible for post-fire water quality response in forests of the western USA.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(10), 769–784.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;minshall1997&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Minshall, G. W., Robinson, C. T., &amp;amp; Lawrence, D. E. (1997). &#039;&#039;Postfire responses of lotic ecosystems in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.&#039;&#039; Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54(11), 2509–2525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4518</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4518"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:20:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Continue with the remaining references: Wine2016, Mataix2004, Huffman2001, Shakesby2006, Williams2022, Beeson2001, Paul2022, Smith2011, Hohner2019, Hohner2017, Burton2016, Allen2005, Kelly2006, Emelko2011, Writer2014, Earl2003, Rust2019, etc. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4517</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4517"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:19:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, persisting for at least 10 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mataix2004&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;huffman2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shakesby2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;williams2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;beeson2001&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wine2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2017&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; causing algal blooms and other biological impacts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;burton2016&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;allen2005&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kelly2006&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smith2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emelko2011&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hohner2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;writer2014&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;earl2003&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; often leading to declines in fish populations.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust2019&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;minshall1997&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;paul2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;smoot2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Smoot, E. E., &amp;amp; Gleason, K. E. (2021). &#039;&#039;Forest fires reduce snow-water storage and advance the timing of snowmelt across the Western US.&#039;&#039; Water, 13(24), 3533.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;giovando2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Giovando, J., &amp;amp; Niemann, J. D. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on snowpack phenology in a changing climate within the western US.&#039;&#039; Water Resources Research, 58(8), e2021WR031569.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;koshkin2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Koshkin, A. L., Hatchett, B. J., &amp;amp; Nolin, A. W. (2022). &#039;&#039;Wildfire impacts on western United States snowpacks.&#039;&#039; Frontiers in Water, 4, 971271.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bar2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Bär, A., Michaletz, S. T., &amp;amp; Mayr, S. (2019). &#039;&#039;Fire effects on tree physiology.&#039;&#039; New Phytologist, 223(4), 1728–1741.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;niccoli2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Niccoli, F., Pacheco-Solana, A., Delzon, S., et al. (2023). &#039;&#039;Effects of wildfire on growth, transpiration and hydraulic properties of Pinus pinaster Aiton forest.&#039;&#039; Dendrochronologia, 79, 126086.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;obrien2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;O&#039;Brien, J. J., Kevin Hiers, J., Mitchell, R. J., Varner III, J. M., &amp;amp; Mordecai, K. (2010). &#039;&#039;Acute physiological stress and mortality following fire in a long-unburned longleaf pine ecosystem.&#039;&#039; Fire Ecology, 6(2), 1–12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dore2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dore, S., Montes-Helu, M., Hart, S. C., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3171–3185.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nolan2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N., Benyon, R. G., et al. (2014). &#039;&#039;Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1363–1377.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;poon2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Poon, P. K., &amp;amp; Kinoshita, A. M. (2018). &#039;&#039;Spatial and temporal evapotranspiration trends after wildfire in semi-arid landscapes.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 559, 71–83.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cooper2019&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cooper, C. E., Aparecido, L. M., Muir, J. P., et al. (2019). &#039;&#039;Transpiration in recovering mixed loblolly pine and oak stands following wildfire in the Lost Pines region of Texas.&#039;&#039; Ecohydrology, 12(1), e2052.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ma2020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., et al. (2020). &#039;&#039;Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California&#039;s Sierra Nevada.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125364.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hausler2018&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Häusler, M., Nunes, J. P., Soares, P., et al. (2018). &#039;&#039;Assessment of the indirect impact of wildfire (severity) on actual evapotranspiration in eucalyptus forest based on the surface energy balance estimated from remote-sensing techniques.&#039;&#039; International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(20), 6499–6524.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;langford1975&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Langford, K. J. (1975). &#039;&#039;Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans.&#039;&#039; Report No. MMBW-W-0003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuczera1987&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kuczera, G. (1987). &#039;&#039;Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest.&#039;&#039; Journal of Hydrology, 94(3–4), 215–236.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;buckley2012&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Buckley, T. N., Turnbull, T. L., Pfautsch, S., et al. (2012). &#039;&#039;Differences in water use between mature and post-fire regrowth stands of subalpine Eucalyptus delegatensis R. Baker.&#039;&#039; Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 1–10.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;meili2024&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meili, N., Beringer, J., Zhao, J., &amp;amp; Fatichi, S. (2024). &#039;&#039;Aerodynamic effects cause higher forest evapotranspiration and water yield reductions after wildfires in tall forests.&#039;&#039; Global Change Biology, 30(1), e16995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Continue with the remaining references: Wine2016, Mataix2004, Huffman2001, Shakesby2006, Williams2022, Beeson2001, Paul2022, Smith2011, Hohner2019, Hohner2017, Burton2016, Allen2005, Kelly2006, Emelko2011, Writer2014, Earl2003, Rust2019, etc. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;minshall1997&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Minshall et al. (1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4516</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4516"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T17:16:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mcgrath2023&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McGrath, D., Zeller, L., Bonnell, R., Reis, W., Kampf, S., Williams, K., ... &amp;amp; Rittger, K. (2023). &#039;&#039;Declines in peak snow water equivalent and elevated snowmelt rates following the 2020 Cameron Peak wildfire in northern Colorado.&#039;&#039; Geophysical Research Letters, 50(6), e2022GL101294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kampf2022&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Kiewiet, L., &amp;amp; Hammond, J. C. (2022). &#039;&#039;Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western US.&#039;&#039; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;alizadeh2021&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Alizadeh et al. (2021).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4515</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4515"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:58:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DragonBravoFire.jpg|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:DragonBravoFire.jpg&amp;diff=4514</id>
		<title>File:DragonBravoFire.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:DragonBravoFire.jpg&amp;diff=4514"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:57:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: Smoke from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
Smoke from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4513</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4513"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:56:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Salton_Sea_Basin_map.png|thumb|600px|Figure 1. Smoke plume from the Dragon Bravo Fire over the Grand Canyon on 7-11-25, NPS Photo/M. Quinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4512</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4512"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:49:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Salton_Sea_Basin_map.png|thumb|600px|Figure 1. The Salton Sea and its watershed, showing the main irrigation canals carrying water from the Colorado River to the agricultural areas, and the waterways, primarily the Alamo River and New River, that convey inflows to the Sea. (Modified from map by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4511</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4511"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:49:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Salton_Sea_Basin_map.png|thumb|600px|Figure 1. The Salton Sea and its watershed, showing the main irrigation canals carrying water from the Colorado River to the agricultural areas, and the waterways, primarily the Alamo River and New River, that convey inflows to the Sea. (Modified from map by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4510</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4510"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:48:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Salton_Sea_Basin_map.png|thumb|600px|Figure 1. The Salton Sea and its watershed, showing the main irrigation canals carrying water from the Colorado River to the agricultural areas, and the waterways, primarily the Alamo River and New River, that convey inflows to the Sea. (Modified from map by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4509</id>
		<title>Wildfire and water</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Wildfire_and_water&amp;diff=4509"/>
		<updated>2026-07-13T16:47:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: Created page with &amp;quot;==Overview==  Figure 1. The Salton Sea and its watershed, showing the main irrigation canals carrying water from the Colorado River to the agricultural areas, and the waterways, primarily the Alamo River and New River, that convey inflows to the Sea. (Modified from map by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Salton_Sea_Basin_map.png|thumb|600px|Figure 1. The Salton Sea and its watershed, showing the main irrigation canals carrying water from the Colorado River to the agricultural areas, and the waterways, primarily the Alamo River and New River, that convey inflows to the Sea. (Modified from map by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico. (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). &lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin&#039;s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires are increasingly impacting watersheds across the western United States. Since 2000, annual burned area has increased several-fold West-wide, many more very large fires (&amp;gt;10,000 acres) burning at higher overall severity, than in the 1980s and 1990s. In the Colorado River Basin, large and severe wildfires since 2000 have impacted runoff-generating watersheds from the subalpine spruce-fir and lodgepole forests of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to the ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of the Mogollon Rim and White Mountains and the Gila Wilderness in New Mexico.  (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022, Alizadeh et al. 2021). The dramatic shifts in wildfire occurrence and severity since the 1980s have multiple causes, including warming and drying of the atmosphere and vegetation with anthropogenic climate change, increases in fuel loading and forest density from past forest uses and fire suppression, and increases in development in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and in wildland recreation, leading to additional structural fuels and more ignition opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can affect the basin’s water resources and complicate their management in two interrelated ways: (1) altering water supply by changing snowpack accumulation and timing, runoff efficiency, and soil infiltration and (2) impairing water quality by mobilizing sediment, organic carbon, metals, and nutrients into the stream. Preventative forest management (e.g., fuels mitigation) can be undertaken to reduce wildfire impacts. These forest treatments can themselves affect watershed hydrology, depending on their intensity and scale. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Notable recent wildfires in the Colorado River Basin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table below summarizes selected large wildfires since 2000 that have impacted water resources in the Colorado River Basin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1. Selected Large Wildfires in the Colorado River Basin since 2000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Major Wildfires and Water-Related Impacts in the Colorado River Basin&lt;br /&gt;
! Fire&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! Size (acres)&lt;br /&gt;
! Location&lt;br /&gt;
! Water-related impacts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wallow&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| 538,049&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Altered summer streamflow, high peak flows and flood events, water quality impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rodeo–Chediski&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| 468,638&lt;br /&gt;
| White Mountains/Mogollon Rim, Arizona (Salt River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Changes in evapotranspiration in previously forested areas; elevated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) documented in the Salt River at Roosevelt Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Whitewater–Baldy&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| 297,845&lt;br /&gt;
| Gila National Forest, New Mexico (Gila River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Stream degradation and debris flows in the Gila River following the fire; destruction of native Gila trout habitat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Troublesome&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 193,812&lt;br /&gt;
| Grand County, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Sediment and debris flows, harmful algal blooms, increased water treatment demands, and elevated peak runoff following precipitation events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dragon–Bravo&lt;br /&gt;
| 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| 145,504&lt;br /&gt;
| North Rim, Grand Canyon, Arizona (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reduced water supply by approximately 50%; destroyed the North Rim&#039;s only potable water system; post-fire debris flows.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Grizzly Creek&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 32,632&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenwood Canyon, Colorado (Colorado River)&lt;br /&gt;
| High turbidity following the fire; debris flows blocked the mainstem Colorado River channel.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dollar Ridge&lt;br /&gt;
| 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| 68,869&lt;br /&gt;
| Strawberry River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows and total dissolved solids (TDS) transported into the Strawberry River and Starvation Reservoir; changes in TDS and pH impaired the fishery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| East Fork&lt;br /&gt;
| 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| 89,765&lt;br /&gt;
| Duchesne River, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
| Debris flows, damage to water lines at Moon Lake Campground, and high total dissolved solids (TDS) influxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Snowpack and timing of snowmelt and runoff===&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires can alter the amount and timing of streamflows primarily by impacting the accumulation and melt of the seasonal snowpack. Large wildfires that kill some portion of the canopy (i.e., crown fire) consistently result in decreased snow-water storage and earlier timing of snowmelt (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022). The loss of forest canopy alters the snowpack energy balance by increasing solar radiation reaching the snow surface, causing enhanced melt and sublimation throughout the winter and spring (McGrath et al., 2023; Kampf et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022). Additionally, black carbon and burned woody debris shed onto the snow post-fire darkens its surface, causing greater absorption of solar radiation and accelerating melt rates (McGrath et al., 2023; Koshkin et al., 2022; Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Kampf et al., 2022). These changes in snow accumulation and melt timing are long-lived (McGrath et al., 2023), persisting for at least 10 years (Smoot &amp;amp; Gleason, 2021; Koshkin et al., 2022; Giovando &amp;amp; Niemann, 2022), and need to be factored into for water supply forecasting, planning, and management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetation and Evaporation Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
By causing both immediate and delayed mortality in non-woody plants, shrubs, and trees wildfires typically result in reductions to total water use (i.e., transpiration) by vegetation in the burn area (Bär et al. 2019, Niccoli et al. 2023, O&#039;Brien et al. 2010). The timing of onset, magnitude, and duration of these changes depend strongly on burn severity, vegetation type, and forest recovery mechanisms. During the period that transpiration is reduced, runoff from the burned area may increase, depending on the fire&#039;s effects on other elements of the area&#039;s water balance.&lt;br /&gt;
Reduced transpiration following wildfire vegetation mortality has been documented across many forest types (Dore et al. 2012, Nolan et al. 2014, Poon and Kinoshita 2018, Cooper et al. 2019, Ma et al. 2020). The duration of these reductions varies, but typically lasts from 2 to 15 years (Hausler et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Dore et al., 2012). In some cases, vigorous regrowth of trees post-fire ultimately leads to greater water use than in the pre-fire condition (Langford 1976, Kuczera 1987, Buckley et al. 2012, Meili et al. 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soils===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wildfires also often change how water from rain and snowmelt moves through–or doesn&#039;t move through–the soil. Fires strip away the protective and water-absorbent surface litter layer, exposing bare soil, and reduce tree canopy cover that could have prevented raindrops from directly striking that soil (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016). High-severity fires can also create a strongly water-repellent (hydrophobic) layer beneath the surface (Mataix-Solera &amp;amp; Doerr, 2004; Huffman et al., 2001; Shakesby &amp;amp; Doerr, 2006). This hydrophobic layer inhibits rain and snowmelt from soaking into the soil, so that more of that water reaches the stream through surface runoff rather than slower groundwater processes (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016; Williams et al., 2022; Koshkin et al., 2022; Beeson et al., 2001). This leads to more abrupt and higher peak stream discharges after snowmelt and rain events, with much higher risk for damaging flash floods and debris flows, and potentially also to increases in total annual water yield, depending on other factors (Wine &amp;amp; Cadol, 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forest Treatments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire can lower the risk of future high severity fires in mid-elevation ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests that have become much denser due to post-1900 fire suppression. These treatments can also improve snowpack retention and modestly increase annual streamflow by reducing canopy interception and evapotranspiration, though sustained increases in water supply from such treatments are uncertain.&lt;br /&gt;
Several water providers, including Denver Water (Forests to Faucets) and Salt River Project (SRP Healthy Forests Initiative), have partnered with land managers to plan, fund, and carry out forest treatments in their Colorado River Basin watersheds to reduce the risk of severe wildfires and their impacts to water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Quality Impacts===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a wildfire, large areas of soil are newly exposed to erosion. The resulting jump in sediment flux to streams and rivers, along with ash and other burned debris, causes many contaminants to exceed pre-fire concentrations by orders of magnitude (Paul et al., 2022). Among those contaminants is dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which can combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to form harmful chlorinated by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) (Smith et al., 2011; Hohner et al., 2019), while also reducing coagulation efficiency in treatment plants (Hohner et al., 2019; Hohner et al., 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can also spike (Paul et al., 2022), causing algal blooms and other biological impacts (Paul et al., 2022; Hohner et al., 2019). Metals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are often mobilized with the sediment and ash as well (Smith et al., 2011; Burton et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2006). While most of these water-chemistry impacts subside within five years of a wildfire, some effects, such as the persistence of nitrogen and DOC, can extend for 15 years or more following high-severity events (Hohner et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the chemical contaminants, the dramatically increased sediment loading in streams and rivers is itself problematic for water treatment (Paul et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2011). High turbidity makes disinfection and filtration less efficient and more costly (Smith et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2022; Emelko et al., 2011), and in extreme conditions water intakes may have to be shut down completely (Hohner et al., 2019; Writer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2022). The influx of ash and sediment also has acute effects on aquatic life (Earl &amp;amp; Blinn, 2003; Paul et al., 2022), often leading to declines in fish populations (Paul et al., 2022; Rust et al., 2019). The altered physical and chemical conditions post-fire can drive shifts in macroinvertebrate communities towards more opportunistic species (Minshall et al., 1997; Paul et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://lcms-viewer.fs2c.usda.gov/mtbs USDA MTBS (Burn Severity) Data Explorer]===&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is an interagency program to map the burn severity and extent of large wildfires (&amp;gt;1,000 acres in the West) based on satellite imagery. When opened, the MTBS Data Explorer will show the perimeter and per-pixel burn severity of all large fires from 1984 through 2024. To see the name, ignition date, and acreage of a fire, select Tools &amp;gt; Pixel Tools &amp;gt; Query Visible Map Layers and then click within a fire perimeter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[https://egp.wildfire.gov/maps/incidents NIFC WildfireSA Public Map]]===&lt;br /&gt;
This interactive map from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) shows all current and recent wildfires (‘incidents’). Click on a fire to bring up more information about that fire. From the Layers button in the upper right, you can also select ‘Fuels Treatments’ to show all recent (&amp;gt;2000) management actions to reduce fuels.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://apps.usgs.gov/landslides/pwfdf/ USGS Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Viewer]===&lt;br /&gt;
The USGS produces rapid postfire debris-flow hazard assessments for select fires in the Western U.S., using geospatial data on basin slopes, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics to estimate the likelihood and volume of debris flows that may occur in response to a defined rainstorm (typically 0.25”-0.5” in 15 minutes, corresponding to a once-in-1-year event).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pacinst-crb-ag-1.pdf Water to Supply the Land: Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This 2025 review paper by Ebel et al. synthesizes existing research on how wildfire alters hydrologic processes and streamflow generation in the western United States. It presents a narrative review and conceptual model highlighting the key factors that shape post-fire changes in streamflow such as seasonal precipitation, the timing overlap between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, shifts in interception and evapotranspiration relative to overall precipitation, and vegetation-related changes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4427</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4427"/>
		<updated>2026-06-09T04:19:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new and recent (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wiki library==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the publications listed below, plus another 400+ pre-2020 publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2026==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Harrold, M., Tessendorf, S. A., Xue, L., et al. (2026). Evaluating the Precipitation Impacts of Cloud Seeding in Southern Wyoming and Northern Colorado using WRF-WxMod® within an Ensemble Modeling Framework. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, e250099. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-25-0099.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Adebiyi, A. A., Liu, Y., et al. (2026). Spring Dust in Colorado Plateau: Transport Pathways and Interannual Variability Derived From Two Decades of MERRA-2 Reanalysis. Geophysical Research Letters, 53(1), e2025GL119096. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL119096&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McQuillan, K. A., Allen, G. H., Pearson, C., et al. (2026). Improving the Spatial Representation of Reservoir Evaporation Using SAR-Based Wind Fields. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2026.3652374&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siler, N., Koszuta, M., Rahimi, S., et al. (2026). Examining the Robustness of Weakened Orographic Influence on Precipitation in Downscaled Climate Projections Over the Western US. Geophysical Research Letters, 53(1), e2025GL119251. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL119251&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhou, R., Perkins, R., Juergensen, D., et al. (2026). Seasonal variability, sources, and parameterization of ice-nucleating particles in the Rocky Mountain region: Importance of soil dust and biological contributions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26(2), 1515–1535. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1515-2026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Besso, H., Mower, R., Pflug, J. M., and Lundquist, J. D. (2026). Mapping 1 April SWE in the Western US Using Standardized Anomalies and Quantiles From SWE Reanalysis and In Situ Stations. Water Resources Research, 62(1), e2025WR040902. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040902&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonacci, O., Žaknić-Ćatović, A., and Roje-Bonacci, T. (2026). Analysis of Annual Water Level Variability in the Mead and Powell Reservoirs of the Colorado River. Water, 18(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020224&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Burns, M. C., and Maxwell, R. M. (2026). Comparing Snow Water Equivalent Estimations From Long Short-Term Memory Networks and Physics-Based Models in the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 62(2), e2025WR041178. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR041178&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dixit, A., Rahimi, S., Huang, L., et al. (2026). High-resolution models better simulate historical snowpack declines in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Environmental Research Letters, 21(5), 054012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae4113&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dougherty, E. M., Gochis, D., Harrold, M., et al. (2026). Simulated Hydrologic Impacts of Cloud Seeding in the North Platte and Little Snake River Basins of Wyoming. Water Resources Research, 62(2), e2024WR039383. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039383&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giovando, J., and Niemann, J. D. (2026). Vulnerability of Snowpack to Wildfire and Changing Climate within Western U.S. Ecoregions. Hydrological Processes, 40(2), e70377. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70377&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gourley, K. C., Bennett, R. A., and Harig, C. (2026). Quantifying Changes in Water Loading in the U.S. Southwest via Comparison of GNSS, GRACE, and SWE Data Sets. Water Resources Research, 62(2), e2025WR040324. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040324&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McQuillan, K. A., Allen, G. H., Pearson, C., et al. (2026). Improving the Spatial Representation of Reservoir Evaporation Using SAR-Based Wind Fields. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2026.3652374&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Moiz, A., and Mascaro, G. (2026). Multiscale Assessment of the Water Balance Components in Arizona Simulated by the National Water Model. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 62(1), e70080. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palumbo, D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Lall, U. (2026). Precipitation, moderated by spring temperature and vegetation, drives runoff efficiency in the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 7(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03136-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Berggren, J., and Wheeler, K. (2026). The Utility of Operationally Neutral and Flexible Conservation Pools in the Colorado River Basin. Concept Paper. Western Resource Advocates. 6 p. https://westernresourceadvocates.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026-5-4-Conservation-Pools.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broman, D., Voisin, N., Steinschneider, S., et al. (2026). How Hydropower Operations Mitigate Flow Forecast Uncertainties to Maintain Grid Services in the Western U.S. Water Resources Research, 62(2), e2025WR040943. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040943&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Crespo, D., Nemati, M., Dinar, A., Frankel, Z., and Halberg, N. (2026). Developing a Decision Support Model to Assess the Value of Cooperation Benefits Under Climate Change: Case of the Colorado River Basin in the United States. In M. Shahbazbegian &amp;amp; A. Dinar (Eds.), Decision Support Models to Assist International and Transboundary Water Negotiations: Methodologies and Applications. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197802601.003.0008&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., Castle, A., de la Parra, C., Fleck, J., Schmidt, J., Sorensen, K., and Tara, K. (2026). Rethinking How the United States and Mexico Share the Colorado River. Getches-Wilkinson Center, University of Colorado Boulder. 27 p. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/754&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ma, X., Wang, J., Gharari, S., Mizukami, N., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2026). Monitoring Reservoir Storage Using SWOT Satellite Observations and a Reservoir Operation Model. Water Resources Research, 62(3), e2025WR041223. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR041223&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2026). Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for Lake Powell and Lake Mead – Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Bureau of Reclamation, Upper and Lower Colorado Basins, Interior Regions 7 and 8. January 2026. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/post2026/draft-eis/index.html&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scariano, J. (2026). Charging Ahead or Drying Up? Lithium Extraction vs Colorado River Stewardship. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 51(1), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v51i1.14600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schumacher, B. L., Yost, M. A., Ulrich-Schad, J. D., Barker, B., and Null, S. E. (2026). Agricultural Water Manager Perspectives on Water Markets in Utah. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 62(1), e70085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sorensen, K., Porter, S., Castle, A., et al. (2026). Considerations for Assigned Water after Expiration of the 2007 Guidelines (p. 42). Kyl Center for Water Policy at Morrison Institute. https://morrisoninstitute.asu.edu/kyl-center-water-policy/publication/considerations-assigned-water-after-expiration-2007-guidelines&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
ASU Kyl Center. (2026). From Copper, Cattle and Cotton to Chips and Cloud Computing: Large Water Uses in Central Arizona (p. 23). Kyl Center for Water Policy at Morrison Institute. https://morrisoninstitute.asu.edu/copper-cattle-and-cotton-chips-and-cloud-computing-large-water-uses-central-arizona&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lucas, N., and Haghdadi, M. (2026). Golf (dis)courses: A political ecology analysis of water usage in an arid area. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 25148486251411654. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251411654&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scariano, J. (2026). Charging Ahead or Drying Up? Lithium Extraction vs Colorado River Stewardship. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 51(1), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v51i1.14600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Clements, E., Crank, K., Hannoun, D., and Gerrity, D. (2026). Quantitative microbial risk assessment of the impact of drought and seasonality on a de facto reuse system in Southern Nevada, USA. Environmental Science: Water Research &amp;amp; Technology, 12(2), 620–635. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EW00514K&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., King, T. V., and Mosbrucker, A. R. (2026). A Comparison of Non-Contact Methods for Measuring Turbidity in the Colorado River. Remote Sensing, 18(4), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040638&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Han, H., Park, S., Bazrkar, M. H., et al. (2026). Integrated Random Forest and APEX-MODFLOW model for predicting and mapping river salinity in the Animas Watershed, Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 64, 103302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103302&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Runkel, R. L., Morrison, J. M., et al. (2026). Distinguishing natural from mining-related metal sources by including streambank groundwater data in a stream mass loading study. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 277, 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2026.104841&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Steigerwald, J., Trenholm, R., Quiñones, O., Vanderford, B. J., and Dickenson, E. (2026). Identifying sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in an arid environment with de facto reuse. Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry, Volume 7-2026. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-chemistry/articles/10.3389/fenvc.2026.1694851&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, B. D., Bone, S. E., Spielman-Sun, E., et al. (2026). Organic colloid composition in variable-redox porewaters within a mountainous floodplain. Water Research, 295, 125556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bromley, F. L., Broxton, P. D., Zhang, J., et al. (2026). Groundwater Dependency and Hydroclimatic Influences on Riparian and Upland Vegetation Productivity, Upper San Pedro, Arizona, United States. Hydrological Processes, 40(3), e70405. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70405&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Friesen, B., Pennock, C. A., and Budy, P. (2026). Invasion potential of nonnative fishes through a large western dam into an iconic and vulnerable ecosystem. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-026-06137-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2026). Bird guilds exhibit varied responses to floodplain forest restoration in the Colorado River delta, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 234, 105558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2026.105558&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Bowen, B., DeHoff, M., et al. (2026). Decadal-Scale Trajectories of Land Cover Change Along the Colorado and San Juan Rivers in Response to Declining Water Storage in Lake Powell Reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 131(2), e2025JG009355. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JG009355&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Soles, E., Cooper, M., and Saito, L. (2026). Anastomosis and Low Flows Sustain Resilient Groundwater Dependent Riparian Floodplains in an Agricultural River Valley, New Mexico. Hydrological Processes, 40(2), e70406. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Holway, J. H., and Ellsworth, C. (2026). Tributary-to-Mainstream Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Discontinuities in the Colorado River, Southwestern USA. Water, 18(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lucas, N., and Haghdadi, M. (2026). Golf (dis)courses: A political ecology analysis of water usage in an arid area. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 25148486251411654. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251411654&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2025==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Anderson, P. J., Godaire, J. E., Jones, D. K., et al. (2025). Collaborative drought science planning in the Colorado River Basin. Open-File Report No. 2025–1041; 32 p. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251041&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adler, B., Caicedo, V., Butterworth, B. J., et al. (2025). The Short Life of Upvalley Wind in a High‐Altitude Valley in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(11), e2025JD043455. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043455&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alessi, M. J., Connolly, C. J., Barnes, E. A., and Rugenstein, M. (2025). Southern Hemisphere Surface Warming Drives Southwestern U.S. Precipitation according to AI-Informed Climate Model Simulations. Journal of Climate, 38(24), 7655–7667. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-25-0176.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Battula, S. B., Cordeira, J. M., Nash, D., Rutz, J. J., and Ralph, F. M. (2025). Leveraging the Atmospheric River Framework to Categorize Top-Decile Precipitation Regimes in Colorado. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(18), e2025GL117528. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL117528&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cleveland, Z., Laguë, M., and Strong, C. (2025). North American Monsoon Response to Antecedent Soil Moisture and Snow in the Colorado Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(16), e2024JD043026. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W. R., McCrary, R., Abel, M. R., et al. (2025). End-of-Century Changes in Orographic Precipitation with the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model over the Western United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26, 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0071.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dougherty, E. M., Tessendorf, S. A., &amp;amp; DeCastro, A. (2025). Historical Warming and Drying in Colorado and Their Impact on Cool-Season Precipitation and Snow. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(9), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0153.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, R., O’Brien, J., Grover, M., et al. (2025). Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (SQUIRE) of snow water equivalent from the Surface Atmospheric Integrated Laboratory. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, e250023. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-25-0023.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Klavans, J. M., DiNezio, P. N., Clement, A. C., Deser, C., Shanahan, T. M., and Cane, M. A. (2025). Human emissions drive recent trends in North Pacific climate variations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09368-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y.-N., Lehner, F., Simpson, I. R., et al. (2025). Recent southwestern US drought exacerbated by anthropogenic aerosols and tropical ocean warming. Nature Geoscience, 18(7), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01728-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Luna-Niño, R., Gershunov, A., Ralph, F. M., et al. (2025). Heresy in ENSO teleconnections: Atmospheric rivers as disruptors of canonical seasonal precipitation anomalies in the Southwestern US. Climate Dynamics, 63(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-025-07583-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mondal, S., and Vivoni, E. R. (2025). Hot Drought of Summer 2023 in Southwestern North America. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(18), e2025GL118308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL118308&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Moore, B. J., Mahoney, K. M., and Abel, M. (2025). Extreme Wet Spells in the Upper Colorado River Basin during the Cool Season. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(7), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0125.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pye, M. J., and Pu, Z. (2025). The Synoptic-Scale Circulation during the Western U.S. Drought of 2021 and 2022. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 64(8), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-24-0059.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Feldman, D., Cox, C. J., Riihimaki, L., and Sedlar, J. (2025). Seasonality and Albedo Dependence of Cloud Radiative Forcing in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(6), e2024JD042366. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042366&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rugg, A., McCrary, R., Rhoades, A., Yates, D., Abel, M., and Devineni, N. (2025). Climate models show Colorado drying sooner and with greater certainty east of the Continental Divide. Environmental Research Communications, 7(9), 091009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae05f6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sengupta, A., Waliser, D. E., DeFlorio, M. J., et al. (2025). Role of evolving sea surface temperature modes of variability in improving seasonal precipitation forecasts. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02235-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tezcan, B., and Garcia, M. (2025). Training a hidden Markov model with PMDI and temperature to create climate informed scenarios. Frontiers in Water, 7, 1472695. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1472695&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Todd, V. L., Shanahan, T. M., DiNezio, P. N., et al. (2025). North Pacific ocean–atmosphere responses to Holocene and future warming drive Southwest US drought. Nature Geoscience, 18(7), 646–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01726-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Y., Geerts, B., Liu, C., and Jing, X. (2025). A Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Simulation of Changes in Precipitation and Snowpack in a Warmer Climate over the Interior Western United States. Climate, 13(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13030046&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Crimmins, M. A., and Meko, M. D. (2025). The Role of Seasonal Precipitation Sequences in Shaping the Climate of the United States Southwest. International Journal of Climatology, 45(15), e70138. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70138&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yue, H., Mascaro, G., Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2025). Hydrometeorological Forecast Skill of the North American Multimodel Ensemble in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(7), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0087.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abdelmohsen, K., Famiglietti, J. S., Ao, Y. Z., Mohajer, B., and Chandanpurkar, H. A. (2025). Declining Freshwater Availability in the Colorado River Basin Threatens Sustainability of Its Critical Groundwater Supplies. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115593&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abud-Russell, Y. R., Hatch-Kuri, G., Lara, M. D. C. C., and Aguilar-Castillo, T. (2025). Environmental evidence of surface manifestations of regional groundwater flows in the lower Colorado River Basin: The case Mexicali Valley, Mexico. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 31, 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101510&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Akkala, A., Boubrahimi, S. F., Hamdi, S. M., Hosseinzadeh, P., and Nassar, A. (2025). Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado Basin. Hydrology, 12(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12030060&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ban, Z., Udall, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2025). Decelerating Response of Western US Runoff to Shrinking Snowpacks. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(9), e2025GL114629. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114629&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brooks, P. D., Solomon, D. K., Kampf, S., et al. (2025). Groundwater dominates snowmelt runoff and controls streamflow efficiency in the western United States. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02303-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Biederman, J. A., Dwivedi, R., et al. (2025). Forest Patch Geometry and Climate Regulate the Impact of Forest Thinning on Snowpack in the Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 18(6), e70111. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70111&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Longley, P. C., Wise, D. R., and McDonnell, M. (2025). Effects of climate on temporal variability in streamflow and salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 61, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Doskocil, L. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Barnard, D. M., Pfohl, A. K. D., Derry, J. E., and Sanford, W. E. (2025). Twin-Peaks Streamflow Timing: Can We Use Forest and Alpine Snow Melt-Out Response to Estimate? Water, 17(13), 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17132017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elkouk, A., Pokhrel, Y., Luo, L., Payton, E., and Livneh, B. (2025). Modeling the Effects of Aridification on Hydrologic Fluxes and Reservoir Dynamics in the U.S. Southwest. Earth’s Future, 13(9), e2025EF006372. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006372&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fassnacht, S. R., and Pfohl, A. K. D. (2025). Snowmelt Streamflow Trends over Colorado (U.S.A.) Mountain Watersheds. Climate, 13(9), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13090177&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herbert, J. N., Raleigh, M. S., and Small, E. E. (2025). Using a Random Forest Model to Combine Airborne Lidar and Snotel Data for Daily Estimates of Snow Depth Across Mountain Drainage Basins of Colorado. Water Resources Research, 61(8), e2024WR039775. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039775&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, K., Williams, K. H., Christensen, J. N., et al. (2025). Hidden Features: How Subsurface and Landscape Heterogeneity Govern Hydrologic Connectivity and Stream Chemistry in a Montane Watershed. Hydrological Processes, 39(3), e70085. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khorrami, M., Werth, S., Zehsaz, S., and Shirzaei, M. (2025). Drought-induced changes in groundwater-surface water exchange at Lake Mead area. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 62, 102996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koshkin, A., Marshall, A. M., and Rittger, K. (2025). Impact of current and warmer climate conditions on snow cover loss in burned forests. Science Advances, 11(38), eadt9866. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt9866&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lai, Y., Choi, B., and Roy, S. B. (2025). Bayesian inference of historical streamflow changes suggests further stress in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 61, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102619&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, W., Maharjan, S., Fisher, J. B., Piechota, T., and El‐Askary, H. (2025). Escalating Hydrological Extremes and Whiplashes in the Western U.S.: Challenges for Water Management and Frontline Communities. Earth’s Future, 13(5), e2024EF005447. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005447&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Jamil, R., and VanLooy, J. (2025). Accelerated Glacier Thinning and Area Loss in the Wind River Range, Wyoming (1968–2019): Climate and Topographic Drivers. Remote Sensing, 17(5), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050916&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Z., Sahotra, H., Ahmad, S., et al. (2025). A Distributed Machine Learning Model for Blue and Green Water Resources With Transferable Applications in Similar Climatic Zones. Water Resources Research, 61(5), e2024WR039169. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039169&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Naple, P., Skiles, S. M., Lang, O. I., et al. (2025). Dust on Snow Radiative Forcing and Contribution to Melt in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(5), e2024GL112757. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112757&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norris, J., Rahimi, S., Huang, L., Bass, B., Thackeray, C. W., and Hall, A. (2025). Uncertainty of 21st Century western U.S. snowfall loss derived from regional climate model large ensemble. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 8(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01002-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Puente, P., Rajagopalan, B., and Condon, L. E. (2025). Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 648, 132386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Raleigh, M. S., Small, E. E., Bair, E. H., Wobus, C., and Rittger, K. (2025). Snow monitoring at strategic locations improves water supply forecasting more than basin-wide mapping. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02660-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ratterman, C., Zhang, W., Affram, G., &amp;amp; Bean, B. (2025). Improving CFSv2 Snow Water Equivalent Forecasts in the Colorado River Basin with Generalized Analog Regression Downscaling. Weather and Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-23-0196.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R., et al. (2025). Light Absorbing Particles Deposited to Snow Cover Across the Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado, 2013–2016: Interannual Variations From Multiple Natural and Anthropogenic Sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(2), e2024JD041676. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041676&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K., Prairie, J., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2025). Developing Storylines of Plausible Future Streamflow and Generating a New Warming‐Driven Declining Streamflow Ensemble: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 61(1), e2024WR038618. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038618&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., Rateb, A., Conway, B., Sorensen, K., Udall, B., and Reedy, R. C. (2025). Multidecadal drought impacts on the Lower Colorado Basin with implications for future management. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02149-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schwat, E., Hogan, D., Paw U, K. T., et al. (2025). Estimating snow sublimation in complex terrain: a season of intensive field measurements and the role of vertical water vapor flux divergence. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(10), 1455-1473. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-25-0022.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tatum, J., Sankey, T. T., Belmonte, A., Dymond, S. F., and Woolley, T. (2025). Five Years of Hourly Soil Water Potential Monitoring Demonstrates Forest Thinning Benefits in the North American Southwest. Ecohydrology, 18(6), e70104. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70104&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Woodburn, E. R., Gardner, W. P., Dennedy-Frank, J. P., &amp;amp; Williams, K. H. (2025). Matrix Diffusion Controls Mountain Hillslope Groundwater Ages and Inferred Storage Dynamics. Groundwater. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13475&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Masbruch, M. D., Knight, J. E., et al. (2025). Hydrologic response of groundwater and streamflow to natural and anthropogenic drivers of change in headwaters of the upper Colorado River basin during recent wet (1982–1999) and drought (2000–2022) conditions. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 60, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102554&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, B., Bass, B., Hall, A., Rahimi, S., and Huang, L. (2025). Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations. Nature Communications, 16(1), 8625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63635-4 [https://wrf-cmip6-noversioning.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html#ben_temp/d02_9km/Sims_LSM_Only/0_Final_post_BC/ Link to GCM data (CMIP6-WRF) used in paper]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, L., Babey, T., Perzan, Z., Pierce, S., Briggs, M., Boye, K., and Maher, K. (2025). Quantifying Groundwater Response and Uncertainty in Beaver-Influenced Mountainous Floodplains Using Machine Learning-Based Model Calibration. Water Resources Research, 61(9), e2024WR039192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, L., Xu, Z., Wang, C., et al. (2025). The Role of Snowmelt and Subsurface Heterogeneity in Headwater Hydrology of a Mountainous Catchment in Colorado: A Model-Data Integration Approach. Water Resources Research, 61(10), e2025WR040651. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025WR040651&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wolf, M. A., Jamison, L., Strong, C., and Brooks, P. D. (2025). Periodic Variability in Baseflow in Headwater Streams of the Upper Colorado River: Implications for Runoff Efficiency. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 61(2), e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yue, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., and Yang, T. (2025). A Machine Learning-Based Water Supply Forecasting Model to Quantify the Impact of Snow Water Equivalent on Seasonal Streamflow Variability Over the Western U.S. Journal of Hydrology, 660, 133465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133465&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zanewich, K. P., and Rood, S. B. (2025). Regional Differences in High Elevation Snowpack Decline Along the North American Rocky Mountains. Hydrological Processes, 39(5), e70153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70153&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B., Hansen, K., and Sorensen, K. (2025). Policy Note: Tough Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Water Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24710024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River Research Group. (2025). Colorado River Insights, 2025: Dancing with Deadpool. (64 pp.) Getches-Wilkinson Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/ColoradoRiverInsights2025DancingWithDeadpool&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fernandes, S., Fernandes, G. W., Pereira, C. C., Raty, J., and Wheeler, K. (2025). Reimagining river governance: Insights from the Colorado river crisis. BioScience, biaf037. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hovis, M., Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., et al. (2025). Illuminating the collective learning continuum in the Colorado River Basin Science-Policy Forums. Environmental Policy and Governance, 35(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., Tara, K. H., and Fleck, J. (2025). A Horse Named “Stream Depletion Theory”: The History and Negotiation of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. Natural Resources Journal, 65(1), 69–122.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2025). Alternatives Report: Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for Lake Powell and Lake Mead (46 pp.). Bureau of Reclamation Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/post2026/alternatives/Post-2026_Alternatives_Report_20250117_508.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robison, J. A. (2025). Relational River: Arizona v. Navajo Nation &amp;amp; the Colorado. UCLA Law Review, 72, 87. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4732273&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J., Castle, A., Fleck, J., Kuhn, E., Sorensen, K., and Tara, K. (2025). Analysis of Colorado River Basin Storage Suggests Need For Immediate Action (13 pp.). Getches-Wilkinson Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/670&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Singhal, A., Szinai, J. K., Yates, D., and Jones, A. D. (2025). Evaluating How Climate Adaptation Measures Affect the Interconnected Water‐Energy Resource Systems of the Western United States. Earth’s Future, 13(7), e2025EF006072. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006072&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sorensen, K., Porter, S., Kuhn, E., and Campbell, C. (2025). Enduring Solutions on the Colorado River Part II: Floating Pools and Grand Bargains (13 pp.). Kyl Center for Water Policy, Arizona State University. https://issuu.com/asuwattscollege/docs/floating_pools_grand_bargains&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, B., Bass, B., Hall, A., Rahimi, S., and Huang, L. (2025). Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations. Nature Communications, 16(1), 8625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63635-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Womble, P., Gorelick, S. M., Thompson, B. H., and Hernandez-Suarez, J. S. (2025). A strategic environmental water rights market for Colorado River reallocation. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01585-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use===&lt;br /&gt;
---- &lt;br /&gt;
Silber-Coats, N., Elias, E., Fernald, K., &amp;amp; Gagliardi, M. (2025). Evaluating alternative crops as a solution to water stress in the U.S. Southwest. Agricultural Water Management, 312, 109439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109439&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arienzo, M. M., Gleason, K. E., Sexstone, G. A., et al. (2025). Latitudinal gradients of snow contamination in the Rocky Mountains associated with anthropogenic sources. Environmental Pollution, 373, 126094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126094&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carey, C., Deemer, B., Gibney, N., et al. (2025). Assessing risk for enhanced cyanobacteria, phytoplankton, and pathogens with changes in water level regime with potential application to Lake Powell and Lake Mead: A mixed methods literature review. National Park Service. https://doi.org/10.36967/2307521&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Longley, P. C., Wise, D. R., and McDonnell, M. (2025). Effects of climate on temporal variability in streamflow and salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 61, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Reibold, R. H., et al. (2025). Low water levels interact with reservoir aging to increase the severity of summertime metalimnion dissolved oxygen minima in Lake Powell, desert Southwest USA. Inland Waters, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2025.2476309&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Graves, B. P., Ralph, T. J., and Morgan, A. M. (2025). Channel breakdown and avulsion in arroyos feeding the Little Colorado River, Arizona, USA. Geomorphology, 468, 109501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Holmes, R., Kroepsch, A., and Singha, K. (2025). River Communities, Disaster Science, and the Politics of Water Safety: Understanding Water Quality Debates in the Aftermath of the Gold King Mine Spill. Environmental Communication, 19(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2390064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, T. V., Bean, R. A., Walton‐Day, K., et al. (2025). Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll-a and Temperature to Support Algal Bloom Monitoring in Blue Mesa Reservoir, Colorado. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 61(4), e70038. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahmoud, M. F., Arabi, M., and Pallickara, S. (2025). Harnessing ensemble Machine learning models for improved salinity prediction in large river basin scales. Journal of Hydrology, 652, 132691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132691&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCleskey, R. B., Cravotta, C. A., Miller, M. P., et al. (2025). Specific conductance and water type as a proxy model for salinity and total dissolved solids measurements in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Applied Geochemistry, 184, 106358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106358&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Newman, C. P., Cowie, R., Wilkin, R. T., and Navarre-Sitchler, A. (2025). Tracing metal sources and groundwater flow paths in the Upper Animas River watershed using rare earth elements and stable isotopes. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 25(1), geochem2024-023. https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2024-023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, J. R., Larsen, I. J., Winnick, M. J., Marmolejo‐Cossío, J. M., and Williams, K. H. (2025). Linking Surface Processes, Solute Generation, and CO2 Budgets Across Lithological and Land Cover Gradients in Rocky Mountain Watersheds. Water Resources Research, 61(4), e2023WR036850. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036850&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Van Der Nagel, C., Clements, E., Wilkerson, C., Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2025). Impact of drought on de facto reuse and water quality in Lake Mead: Insights from hydrodynamic modeling versus machine learning. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 193, 106649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106649&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Berkelhammer, M., Page, G. F. M., Zurek, F., et al. (2025). Canopy structure modulates the sensitivity of subalpine forest stands to interannual snowpack and precipitation variability. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29(3), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-701-2025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Yackulic, C. B., Eppehimer, D. E., Bestgen, K. R., Jones, M. T., and Michaud, C. (2025). Estimating drivers and identifying uncertainties in smallmouth bass population dynamics in an invaded river network. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 82, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0183&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2025). Daily Fluctuating Flows Affect Riparian Plant Species Distributions From Local to Regional Scales. Applied Vegetation Science, 28(3), e70033. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.70033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cooper, D. J., Schweiger, E. W., Shaw, J. R., et al. (2025). Rapid riparian ecosystem decline in Rocky Mountain National Park. Conservation Biology, e70053. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Enriquez, A., Bagstad, K., Dahm, K., Torregrosa, A., and Schuster, R. (2025). Scoping decision-maker needs and science availability to support regional natural capital accounting in the U.S. Colorado River Basin. One Ecosystem, 10, e147848. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.10.e147848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D. E., Yackulic, C. B., Bruckerhoff, L. A., et al. (2025). Declining reservoir elevations following a two-decade drought increase water temperatures and non-native fish passage facilitating a downstream invasion. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 82, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hedden, S. C., Albrecht, B., Rogers, R. J., et al. (2025). Do conservation actions improve native fish populations? Differences between managed and unmanaged reaches of a desert river give insight. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, vqaf002. https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt/vqaf002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Moorhead, L. C., Pennino, M. J., Sabo, R. D., and LeDuc, S. D. (2025). Fire Retardants Are an Overlooked Source of Phosphorus to Western US Ecosystems. ACS ES&amp;amp;T Water, 5(4), 1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00966&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Ogle, K., Butterfield, B. J., et al. (2025). Hotter temperatures alter riparian plant outcomes under regulated river conditions. Ecological Monographs, 95(1), e1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1645&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Parks, S. A., Coop, J. D., and Davis, K. T. (2025). Intensifying Fire Season Aridity Portends Ongoing Expansion of Severe Wildfire in Western US Forests. Global Change Biology, 31(8), e70429. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70429&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Remke, M., Schneider, K., and Korb, J. (2025). Leafing Out: Leaf Area Index as an Indicator for Mountain Forest Recovery Following Mixed-Severity Wildfire in Southwest Colorado. Forests, 16(6), 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060872&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rogowski, D. L., Fonken, D. R., Rogers, R. J., and Albrecht, B. (2025). Consequences of a drying reservoir: Positive or negative effects on riverine fish? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 154(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/tafafs/vnaf004&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Roos, C. I., Kaib, J. M., Laluk, N. C., et al. (2025). Tree rings reveal persistent Western Apache (Ndee) fire stewardship and niche construction in the American Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(32), e2509169122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509169122&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Severson, J. P., Bishop, T. B. B., Knight, A. C., et al. (2025). Mapping ecological states in the upper Colorado River basin: Implications for fire management. Environmental Research: Ecology, 4(3), 035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664X/adf55f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Van Der Nagel, C., Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2025). Stable phytoplankton community compositions in Lake Mead (Nevada-Arizona, USA) during two decades of severe drought. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 23, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100491&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Avila, P., Nemati, M., Crespo, D., Dinar, A., Frankel, Z., and Halberg, N. (2025). Public Spending and Water Scarcity: An Empirical Analysis of USBR Investments in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 61(5), e70042. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70042&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bahrami, S., Rouhi Rad, M., and Nayga Jr., R. M. (2025). Dollars for Drops: Abatement Cost of Water for Irrigation in the Colorado River Basin. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cohen, M., and Halama, K. (2025). Breathing Hazard: Air Pollution in the Salton Sea Region. Pacific Institute. https://pacinst.org/publication/breathing-hazard/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Crespo, D., Nemati, M., Dinar, A., Frankel, Z., and Halberg, N. (2025). Assessing the economic value of water in the Colorado River Basin: A hydroeconomic analysis. Water Resources and Economics, 52, 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2025.100266&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jones, B. A., Wang, J., and Fleck, J. (2025). Sending Agricultural Water to The Salton Sea to Improve Public Health? An Integrated Agri-Hydro-Health Economic Analysis. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.  https://doi.org/10.1086/737530&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhong, Q., Tong, D., Crosson, C., Zhang, Y., and Bhushan, R. (2025). Optimizing Investments in Alternative Water Infrastructure for Urban Food Production in Water Stressed Cities. Water Resources Research, 61(2), e2024WR039025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR03902&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cox, C. J., Intrieri, J. M., Butterworth, B., et al. (2024). Observations of surface energy fluxes and meteorology in the seasonally snow-covered high-elevation East River Watershed during SPLASH, 2021–2023. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-158&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heflin, S., Abel, M., Biswas, S., et al. (2024). X-Band Radar and Surface-Based Observations of Cold-Season Precipitation in Western Colorado’s Complex Terrain. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 25(10), 1501–1523. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawrence, D., Tercek, M., Runyon, A., and Wright, J. (2024). Historical and projected climate change for Grand Canyon National Park and surrounding areas. National Park Service. https://doi.org/10.36967/2301726&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lehner, F. (2024). Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research. iScience, 27(11), 111113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111113&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhuang, Y., Fu, R., Lisonbee, J., et al. (2024). Anthropogenic warming has ushered in an era of temperature-dominated droughts in the western United States. Science Advances, 10(45), eadn9389, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn9389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Babey, T., Perzan, Z., Pierce, S., et al. (2024). Mountainous Floodplain Connectivity in Response to Hydrological Transitions. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037162. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037162&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Niswonger, R. G., Ulrich, C., et al. (2024). Declining groundwater storage expected to amplify mountain streamflow reductions in a warmer world. Nature Water, 2(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00239-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dwivedi, R., Biederman, J. A., Broxton, P. D., et al. (2024). How three-dimensional forest structure regulates the amount and timing of snowmelt across a climatic gradient of snow persistence. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1374961. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1374961&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gold, D. F., Gupta, R. S., and Reed, P. M. (2024). Exploring the Spatially Compounding Multi-Sectoral Drought Vulnerabilities in Colorado’s West Slope River Basins. Earth’s Future, 12(11), e2024EF004841. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004841&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Deemer, B. R., Metcalfe, A. N., et al. (2024). eZ flow metrics: Using z-scores to estimate deviations from natural flow in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4360&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schulz, E. Y., Morrison, R. R., Bailey, R. T., et al. (2024). River corridor beads are important areas of floodplain-groundwater exchange within the Colorado River headwaters watershed. Hydrological Processes, 38(9), e15282. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15282&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sprenger, M., Carroll, R. W. H., Marchetti, D., et al. (2024). Stream water sourcing from high-elevation snowpack inferred from stable isotopes of water: A novel application of d-excess values. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(7), 1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1711-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Vano, J., Petach, T., Deems, J., et al. (2024). A Collaborative, In Situ Mountain Hydrology NASA Test Bed. Prepared for the NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program. Aspen Global Change Institute. https://doi.org/10.69925/VCBQ9771&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River Research Group. (2024). Active and Passive Water Saving Mechanisms on the Colorado River: Challenges and Opportunities. 4 pp. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/527&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Debaere, P., Li, T., Fox, S., et al. (2024). Closing Loopholes in Water Rights Systems to Save Water: The Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR036667. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036667&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P., Quinn, J., Vernon, C., &amp;amp; Thurber, T. (2024). Scenario storyline discovery for planning in multi‐actor human‐natural systems confronting change. Earth&#039;s Future, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004252&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E. (2024). The Risks and Potential Impacts of a Colorado River Compact Curtailment on Colorado River In-Basin and Transmountain Water Rights Within Colorado. Colorado Environmental Law Journal, 35(2). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/celj/vol35/iss2/4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawless, K. L., Garcia, M., and White, D. D. (2024). Institutional analysis of water governance in the Colorado River Basin, 1922–2022. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1451854. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1451854&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez, S. F., Knight, J. E., Tilman, F. D., et al. (2024). Database of surface water diversion sites and daily withdrawals for the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1980–2022. Scientific Data, 11(1), 1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04123-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perry, D., Swanson, R. K., and Springer, A. E. (2024). Policy deficiencies and contingency plans: Groundwater management implications for baseflow contributions to the Colorado River. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1444015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1444015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., and Fleck, J. (2024). It is Time to Expand the Geography of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program. White Paper No. 9; Future of the Colorado River Project, 4 pp. Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu//coloradoriver/files/news/White-Paper-9.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Seay-Fleming, C., Brown, A., Gerlak, A. K., et al. (2024). Engaging farmers in water governance in the Western United States: Lessons from the Colorado River Basin. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 6(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00203-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Terando, A., Tucker, A., Runyon, A., et al. (2024). Best Practices for Incorporating Climate Change Science into Department of Interior Analyses, Consultations, and Decision Making. Climate Adaptation Science Centers. https://doi.org/10.21429/HJGJ-J073&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Volk, J. M., Huntington, J. L., Melton, F. S., et al. (2024). Assessing the accuracy of OpenET satellite-based evapotranspiration data to support water resource and land management applications. Nature Water, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00181-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahal, A., Mendenhall, E., and Giordano, M. (2024). Water in the West: Analyzing the disconnect between farmers’ and policymakers’ perceptions of Colorado River Basin shortages in Arizona. Journal of Rural Studies, 111, 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103398&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Busse, M. M., McKibben, M. A., Stringfellow, W., Dobson, P., and Stokes-Draut, J. R. (2024). Impact of geothermal expansion and lithium extraction in the Salton Sea known geothermal resource area (SS-KGRA) on local water resources. Environmental Research Letters, 19(10), 104011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6a73&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., and Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wobus, C., Nash, C., Culp, P. W., Kelly, M., and Kennedy, K. (2024). Simplified agricultural water use accounting in the Colorado River basin using OpenET. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad984b&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bouskill, N. J., Newcomer, M., Carroll, R. , et al. (2024). A Tale of Two Catchments: Causality Analysis and Isotope Systematics Reveal Mountainous Watershed Traits That Regulate the Retention and Release of Nitrogen. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 129(3), e2023JG007532. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007532&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Topping, D. J., Salter, G., et al. (2024). Implementation of Controlled Floods for Sediment Management on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon Under Aridification. River Research and Applications, n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4374&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ridgway, P., Lane, B., Canham, H., et al. (2024). Wildfire, extreme precipitation and debris flows, oh my! Channel response to compounding disturbances in a mountain stream in the Upper Colorado Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(12), 3855–3872. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tyree, G. L., Chappell, A., Villarreal, M. L., Dhital, S., Duniway, M. C., Edwards, B. L., Faist, A. M., Nauman, T. W., &amp;amp; Webb, N. P. (2024). Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(11), 3292–3307. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5887&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Boyer, J. K., Fonken, D. R., and Rogowski, D. L. (2024). Why new scientific information is important for native fish conservation: A case study from the humpback chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;) in the Grand Canyon, U.S.A. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34(1), e4075. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4075&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallaro, M. C., and Schumann, D. A. (2024). Utility of artificial river reef structures to enhance fish habitat below a hydropeaking dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4365&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilbert, E. I., Diver, T. A., Mussmann, S. M., et al. (2024). Why Is It Too Cold? Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Cold-Water Pollution Effects on Recruitment of an Imperiled Warmwater Fish. Molecular Ecology, n/a(n/a), e17588. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17588&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Gómez-Sapiens, M., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Avian communities respond to plant and landscape composition in actively revegetated floodplains of the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107266&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hedden, C., Rogowski, D. L., Boyer, J., and Mason-Sarantopulos, L. (2024). Temporal Patterns of Fish Occurrence in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon in Response to Temperature, Largescale Drought, and Newly Exposed Habitat. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4392&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hodge, B. W., Henderson, R., and Brehme, C. E. (2024). Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4373&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Magruder, A. C., Barrile, G. M., Siddons, S., Walrath, J., and Walters, A. W. (2024). Seasonal movements between main stem and tributaries may facilitate the persistence of Roundtail Chub and Flannelmouth Sucker within an altered stream system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 153(5), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10489&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mussmann, S. M. (2024). Assembly and annotation of a chromosome-level reference genome for the endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius). G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 14(11), jkae217. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkae217&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gomez-Sapiens, M., et al. (2024). Greenness and Actual Evapotranspiration in the Unrestored Riparian Corridor of the Colorado River Delta in Response to In-Channel Water Deliveries in 2021 and 2022. Remote Sensing, 16(10), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. et al. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perkins, D. W., Wight, A., Wondzell, M., and Friedman, J. M. (2024). Riparian Vegetated Area in Pre-Dam, Post-Dam, and Environmental Flow Periods in Canyonlands National Park From 1940 to 2022. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, D. M., and Friggens, M. M. (2024). Co-production of a vulnerability assessment for aquatic and riparian ecosystems in the southwestern United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 60(6), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13240&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thaxton, R., Scott, M. L., Kemper, J. T., Rathburn, S. L., Butzke, S., &amp;amp; Friedman, J. M. (2024). Downstream decreases in water availability, tree height, canopy volume and growth rate in cottonwood forests along the Green River, southwestern USA. Ecohydrology, 17(7), e2693. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2693&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Blevins, S., Hansen, K. M., Paige, G. B., MacKinnon, A., &amp;amp; Bastian, C. T. (2024). Economic Evaluation of Water Management Alternatives in the Upper Green River Basin of Wyoming. Water, 16(12), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121685&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Frisvold, G. B., and Atla, J. (2024). Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(8), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11080125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kaczmarski, J. I., &amp;amp; Jones, B. A. (2024). The marginal generation and emissions impacts of purchased hydropower: Evidence from the Colorado River Storage Project. Energy Economics, 138, 107816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107816&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yu, G., Wright, D. B., and Davenport, F. V. (2022). Diverse Physical Processes Drive Upper-Tail Flood Quantiles in the US Mountain West. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(10), e2022GL098855. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098855&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeHoff, M. (2022). Who is in Charge of the Mud? Natural Resources Journal, 62(2), 325–339.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.coloradobasinroundtable.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado_2022-Project-Report_FINAL_no-Appendix.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=4314</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=4314"/>
		<updated>2025-12-10T17:00:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Basin_science_map.png|thumb|400px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1.&#039;&#039;&#039; Representation of the different models and data, and their underlying science, applied to decision-making in the Colorado River Basin. (Design: J. Lukas, adapted from L. Payton; basin map by Western Water Assessment (L. Woelders); thumbnail images from University of Washington VIC group, NOAA Colorado Basin River Forecast Center, and Reclamation)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2025 4 panel Plot Udall.jpg|thumb|400px|link=Current_conditions#The_Colorado_River_.274-panel_plot.27|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 2.&#039;&#039;&#039; The &amp;quot;4-panel plot&amp;quot; showing trends in Colorado River Basin reservoir storage, natural streamflow, precipitation, and temperature, through Water Year 2025. Click on the figure for a larger version. (Figure: Brad Udall; Data: Reclamation - reservoir storage and streamflow; NOAA NCEI - precipitation and temperature)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Colorado River Science Wiki&#039;&#039;&#039; is a web-based clearinghouse for scientific and technical information relevant to the Colorado River Basin and the management of its water resources and related natural resources. This clearinghouse is intended to be useful to managers and other decision-makers, to researchers, to the media, and to the broader public. Its objectives are to:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Share recent and ongoing Colorado River research efforts and findings&lt;br /&gt;
*Provide up-to-date synthesis of the science relevant to management&lt;br /&gt;
*Allow one-stop access to key technical datasets and data tools&lt;br /&gt;
*Help inform discussions about the next [https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/ Interim Guidelines] &lt;br /&gt;
*Engage the greater Colorado River community in a joint information-gathering effort  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Wiki is still in the early stages of development and will evolve and expand. We welcome your feedback; please use this [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfVXdC1lZde88uk5Nld1qnDDtzXQr1XaDIjFo1KlQ1shCY20A/viewform form] to send us suggestions, or reach us at the contact information below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Outline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are six main sections in the Wiki. Each section can be accessed via the navigation panel on the left side of the page. &lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Science and applications]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Provides up-to-date information across dozens of areas of management-relevant science. Each page has at least the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*Summary description of the topic&lt;br /&gt;
*The topic&#039;s relevance to Colorado River water management&lt;br /&gt;
*Annotated links to datasets, tools, and other information and science synthesis on that topic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Data and tools]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collates all of the annotated links to the datasets and tools from Section 1, to make them available in one place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[New research]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lists, by year and by subject, research studies and relevant reports published since 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Water law and policy]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Describes the legal and policy context in which the science and applications to inform water management are implemented. &lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Who&#039;s who]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Identifies key players in the science-to-applications (aka research-to-operations, or R2O) chain in the basin, and provides links to homepages and other resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[About the river]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Provides a very brief introduction to the Colorado River and the challenges that have emerged in the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==			&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The development of the Wiki is being carried out by Julie Vano and Tanya Petach (Aspen Global Change Institute), Brad Udall (Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University), and Jeff Lukas (Lukas Climate Research and Consulting). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To provide feedback on the Wiki content, please see the [[Feedback]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For other questions about the Wiki, please contact Julie (jvano [at] agci.org) or Brad (Bradley.udall [at] colostate.edu).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Acknowledgements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of the Wiki is currently supported by funding from the Bureau of Reclamation’s Upper Colorado River Basin (Interior Region 7) and Lower Colorado Basin (Interior Region 8), as well as in-kind support from Aspen Global Change Institute and the Colorado State University Colorado Water Center. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are seeking additional funding for the Wiki from the Colorado River community; please contact Julie (jvano [at] agci.org) if you are interested in supporting this effort. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 2020 to 2024, the development of the Wiki was also supported by U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center (SW CASC) Grant #G18AC00320, and funding and in-kind support from the Colorado State University Colorado Water Center.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:reclamation_logo_blue.webp|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:logo_spacer.png|30px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AGCI_logo.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:logo_spacer.png|30px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CSU-CWC_logo.png|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWCASC_logo.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:logo_spacer.png|50px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USGS_logo.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- BEGIN Comment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Basin_science_map.png|thumb|400px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1.&#039;&#039;&#039; Representation of the different models and data, and their underlying science, applied to decision-making in the Colorado River Basin. (Design: J. Lukas, adapted from L. Payton; basin map by Western Water Assessment (L. Woelders); thumbnail images from University of Washington VIC group, NOAA Colorado Basin River Forecast Center, and Reclamation)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;[[File:Basin_science_map.png|frame|400px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1.&#039;&#039;&#039; Representation of different science applications in the Colorado River Basin. (Basemap source: Western Water Assessment)]]&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ColoradoRiverScience.Org is being created to provide a clearinghouse about science and data about the Colorado River.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is intended for use by Decision Makers, Scientists, Students, the Press, and the Public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To obtain a login to allow editing, please contact the site administrator below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edits are subject to review and will not be made public until approved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site is under construction as of 1/21/2020. Currently, a skeleton is in place to allow prototyping and initial design. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You might find this page to be of use as we build the site. It is a live ongoing compilation of relevant publications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact Brad Udall Bradley.udall @ colostate.edu for information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Page purpose: Here we show recent scientific, news and policy articles. An archive of older articles will also be accessible as older articles are displaced by newer articles over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Toclimit|limit=3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recent Scientific Papers ===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==== [https://ametsoc.net/eee/2018/3_Williams0187.pdf Quantifying Human-Induced Temperature Impacts On The 2018 United States Four Corners Hydrologic And Agro-Pastoral Drought ] ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emily Williams &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Chris Funk &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Shraddhanand Shukla&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Daniel McEvoy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
January 23, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Summary =====&lt;br /&gt;
Human-induced (HI) warming increased Four Corners’ vapor pressure deficits and reduced the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index by ~18%–30%. Without HI warming, March snow water equivalent would have been ~20% higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
==== [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1752-1688.12822?campaign=wolearlyview A Long View of Southern California Water Supply: Perfect Droughts Revisited ]====&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1752-1688.12822?campaign=wolearlyview]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C.A. Woodhouse&lt;br /&gt;
D.M. Meko&lt;br /&gt;
E.R. Bigio&lt;br /&gt;
First published: 08 January 2020 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Journal of the American Water Resources Association&lt;br /&gt;
===== Abstract =====&lt;br /&gt;
The impact of drought on water resources in arid and semiarid regions can be buffered by water supplies from different source regions. Simultaneous drought in all major source regions — or perfect drought — poses the most serious challenge to water management. We examine perfect droughts relevant to Southern California (SoCal) water resources with instrumental records and tree‐ring reconstructions for the Sacramento and Colorado Rivers, and SoCal. Perfect droughts have occurred five times since 1906, lasting two to three years, except for the most recent event, 2012–2015. This number and duration of perfect droughts is not unusual in the context of the past six centuries. The modern period stands out for the relatively even distribution of perfect droughts and lacks the clusters of perfect drought documented in prior centuries. In comparison, perfect droughts of the 12th Century were both longer (up to nine years) and more widespread. Perfect droughts of the 20th and 21st Centuries have occurred under different oceanic/atmospheric patterns, zonal and meridional flow, and ENSO or non‐ENSO conditions. Multidecadal coherence across the three regions exists, but it has varied over the past six centuries, resulting in irregular intervals of perfect drought. Although the causes of perfect droughts are not clear, given the long‐term natural variability along with projected changes in climate, it is reasonable to expect more frequent and longer perfect droughts in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==== [https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019GL086689 Bias correction of paleoclimatic reconstructions: A new look at 1200+ years of Upper Colorado River flow] ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scott M. Robeson, &lt;br /&gt;
Justin T. Maxwell, &lt;br /&gt;
Darren L. Ficklin &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
January 3, 2020 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geophysical Research Letters&lt;br /&gt;
===== Key points =====&lt;br /&gt;
# Bias correction makes paleoclimatic models more comparable to observations&lt;br /&gt;
# After bias correction, the 1100s Colorado River megadrought became more extreme&lt;br /&gt;
# The early 1600s Colorado River pluvial rivals that of the early 20th century after bias correction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Plain Language Summary =====&lt;br /&gt;
To study past climates, scientists use indicators such as tree‐ring widths that are related to temperature, precipitation, or streamflow. While these indicators usually are very reliable, they sometimes do not perform as well with extreme events such as intense droughts and wet periods. Here, we adopt a method that can correct for these limitations and apply it to a 1,200+year record of streamflow for the Upper Colorado River, a critical source of water for much of the southwestern United States. After using our method, we find that several extreme events from the tree‐ring record of streamflow were even more intense than formerly thought. In particular, the largest drought in the record that occurred during the 1100s was drier and longer lasting after our correction. During the 56‐year duration of the 1100s drought, our correction makes the flow in the river lower by nearly 52 × 109 m3 of water, which is the equivalent of 1.45 times the capacity of Lake Mead (the largest reservoir in the United States). And, while it was known that the early 1900s was among the wettest periods in the last 1,200+ years, we identify a period in the early 1600s that matches it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recent News Articles ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[https://phys.org/news/2020-01-climate-hazard-scientists-corners-drought.html Climate hazard scientists connect 2018&#039;s Four Corners drought directly to human-caused climate change]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
January 23, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://coloradosun.com/2020/01/22/climate-change-water-west-computer-model/ We know the earth is warming. We know that will stress water in the West. But we don’t know how.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
January 22, 2020&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Jaffe &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Sun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Short Summary =====&lt;br /&gt;
Two critical, big-picture questions loom: How much snow will fall in the mountains and how much water will there be for the region’s forests, farms and cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[https://blog.google/products/search/discovering-millions-datasets-web/ Discovering millions of datasets on the web]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Natasha Noy&lt;br /&gt;
Research Scientist, Google Research&lt;br /&gt;
Published Jan 23, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== From the First Paragraph =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Across the web, there are millions of datasets about nearly any subject that interests you. If you’re looking to buy a puppy, you could find datasets compiling complaints of puppy buyers or studies on puppy cognition. Or if you like skiing, you could find data on revenue of ski resorts or injury rates and participation numbers. Dataset Search has indexed almost 25 million of these datasets, giving you a single place to search for datasets and find links to where the data is. Over the past year, people have tried it out and provided feedback, and now Dataset Search is officially out of beta.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Website =====&lt;br /&gt;
[https://datasetsearch.research.google.com Google Dataset Search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recent Policy Articles ===&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Strategies for Managing the Colorado River in an Uncertain Future ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf Complete White Paper]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/FS_whitepaper3.pdf Two Page Brief]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jian Wang, David E. Rosenberg, Kevin G. Wheeler, John C. Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
February 12, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Understanding What We Don&#039;t Know&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River stakeholders face many uncertainties—issues like climate change, future water demand, and evolving ecological priorities—and are looking for new tools to help cope. Managers and stakeholders need ways to help classify uncertain conditions, manage for them, and create models in the face of a slew of oncoming unknowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help Colorado River stakeholders think about, talk about, and better manage the future river, the Center for Colorado River Studies offers a new white paper that distinguishes four levels of decision-making uncertainty. We illustrate each level of uncertainty with examples and show that there is greater uncertainty associated with planning for long time horizons, such as in developing policies that anticipate the increasing possibility of drought, extreme climate events, and unknown patterns of future human use of water. We argue that better public policies will emerge if stakeholders recognize the different levels of uncertainty for future events. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using defined levels of uncertainty can guide stakeholders to appropriate management and modeling tools and lead to more precise and effective conversation and negotiation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;From the paper: Suggested Practices for an Uncertain Future&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Classify uncertainties by level. &lt;br /&gt;
#Include and track more information as it becomes available. &lt;br /&gt;
#Define more signposts to signal when future water supply and river ecosystem outcomes deteriorate and trigger an alternative policy. &lt;br /&gt;
#Identify more alternative policies for when circumstances trigger a signpost. &lt;br /&gt;
#Construct potential pathways that connect signposts and alternative policies over time. &lt;br /&gt;
#Match the planning horizon to the uncertainty level. &lt;br /&gt;
#Retain more reservoir storage at the end of the model planning horizon to save water for future managers and generations to use. &lt;br /&gt;
#Seek better policies that improve water supply and river ecosystem outcomes across more future scenarios, rather than best policies. &lt;br /&gt;
#Allow users more flexibility to respond to changing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
#Visualize adaptive policies to show system adaptations over time, identify gaps in policies, and adapt policies to include more information and signposts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The Risk of Curtailment under the Colorado River Compact ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3483654&amp;amp;download=yes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anne Castle &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
John Fleck&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/news/castle_research Summary via Utah State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
END COMMENT--!&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:2025_4_panel_Plot_Udall.jpg&amp;diff=4313</id>
		<title>File:2025 4 panel Plot Udall.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:2025_4_panel_Plot_Udall.jpg&amp;diff=4313"/>
		<updated>2025-12-10T16:59:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: Brad Udall 4-panel plot (updated Dec, 2025)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
Brad Udall 4-panel plot (updated Dec, 2025)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4312</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4312"/>
		<updated>2025-12-10T16:41:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wiki library==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2025==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adler, B., Caicedo, V., Butterworth, B. J., et al. (2025). The Short Life of Upvalley Wind in a High‐Altitude Valley in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(11), e2025JD043455. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043455&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cleveland, Z., Laguë, M., and Strong, C. (2025). North American Monsoon Response to Antecedent Soil Moisture and Snow in the Colorado Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(16), e2024JD043026. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W. R., McCrary, R., Abel, M. R., et al. (2025). End-of-Century Changes in Orographic Precipitation with the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model over the Western United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26, 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0071.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dougherty, E. M., Tessendorf, S. A., &amp;amp; DeCastro, A. (2025). Historical Warming and Drying in Colorado and Their Impact on Cool-Season Precipitation and Snow. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(9), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0153.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Klavans, J. M., DiNezio, P. N., Clement, A. C., Deser, C., Shanahan, T. M., and Cane, M. A. (2025). Human emissions drive recent trends in North Pacific climate variations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09368-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y.-N., Lehner, F., Simpson, I. R., et al. (2025). Recent southwestern US drought exacerbated by anthropogenic aerosols and tropical ocean warming. Nature Geoscience, 18(7), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01728-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Luna-Niño, R., Gershunov, A., Ralph, F. M., et al. (2025). Heresy in ENSO teleconnections: Atmospheric rivers as disruptors of canonical seasonal precipitation anomalies in the Southwestern US. Climate Dynamics, 63(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-025-07583-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mondal, S., and Vivoni, E. R. (2025). Hot Drought of Summer 2023 in Southwestern North America. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(18), e2025GL118308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL118308&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Moore, B. J., Mahoney, K. M., and Abel, M. (2025). Extreme Wet Spells in the Upper Colorado River Basin during the Cool Season. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(7), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0125.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pye, M. J., and Pu, Z. (2025). The Synoptic-Scale Circulation during the Western U.S. Drought of 2021 and 2022. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 64(8), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-24-0059.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Feldman, D., Cox, C. J., Riihimaki, L., and Sedlar, J. (2025). Seasonality and Albedo Dependence of Cloud Radiative Forcing in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(6), e2024JD042366. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042366&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sengupta, A., Waliser, D. E., DeFlorio, M. J., et al. (2025). Role of evolving sea surface temperature modes of variability in improving seasonal precipitation forecasts. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02235-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tezcan, B., and Garcia, M. (2025). Training a hidden Markov model with PMDI and temperature to create climate informed scenarios. Frontiers in Water, 7, 1472695. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1472695&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Todd, V. L., Shanahan, T. M., DiNezio, P. N., et al. (2025). North Pacific ocean–atmosphere responses to Holocene and future warming drive Southwest US drought. Nature Geoscience, 18(7), 646–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01726-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Y., Geerts, B., Liu, C., and Jing, X. (2025). A Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Simulation of Changes in Precipitation and Snowpack in a Warmer Climate over the Interior Western United States. Climate, 13(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13030046&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yue, H., Mascaro, G., Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2025). Hydrometeorological Forecast Skill of the North American Multimodel Ensemble in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(7), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-24-0087.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abdelmohsen, K., Famiglietti, J. S., Ao, Y. Z., Mohajer, B., and Chandanpurkar, H. A. (2025). Declining Freshwater Availability in the Colorado River Basin Threatens Sustainability of Its Critical Groundwater Supplies. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115593&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Akkala, A., Boubrahimi, S. F., Hamdi, S. M., Hosseinzadeh, P., and Nassar, A. (2025). Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado Basin. Hydrology, 12(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12030060&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ban, Z., Udall, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2025). Decelerating Response of Western US Runoff to Shrinking Snowpacks. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(9), e2025GL114629. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114629&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brooks, P. D., Solomon, D. K., Kampf, S., et al. (2025). Groundwater dominates snowmelt runoff and controls streamflow efficiency in the western United States. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02303-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Doskocil, L. G., Fassnacht, S. R., Barnard, D. M., Pfohl, A. K. D., Derry, J. E., and Sanford, W. E. (2025). Twin-Peaks Streamflow Timing: Can We Use Forest and Alpine Snow Melt-Out Response to Estimate? Water, 17(13), 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17132017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fassnacht, S. R., and Pfohl, A. K. D. (2025). Snowmelt Streamflow Trends over Colorado (U.S.A.) Mountain Watersheds. Climate, 13(9), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13090177&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herbert, J. N., Raleigh, M. S., and Small, E. E. (2025). Using a Random Forest Model to Combine Airborne Lidar and Snotel Data for Daily Estimates of Snow Depth Across Mountain Drainage Basins of Colorado. Water Resources Research, 61(8), e2024WR039775. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039775&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, K., Williams, K. H., Christensen, J. N., et al. (2025). Hidden Features: How Subsurface and Landscape Heterogeneity Govern Hydrologic Connectivity and Stream Chemistry in a Montane Watershed. Hydrological Processes, 39(3), e70085. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koshkin, A., Marshall, A. M., and Rittger, K. (2025). Impact of current and warmer climate conditions on snow cover loss in burned forests. Science Advances, 11(38), eadt9866. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt9866&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lai, Y., Choi, B., and Roy, S. B. (2025). Bayesian inference of historical streamflow changes suggests further stress in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 61, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102619&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, W., Maharjan, S., Fisher, J. B., Piechota, T., and El‐Askary, H. (2025). Escalating Hydrological Extremes and Whiplashes in the Western U.S.: Challenges for Water Management and Frontline Communities. Earth’s Future, 13(5), e2024EF005447. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005447&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Jamil, R., and VanLooy, J. (2025). Accelerated Glacier Thinning and Area Loss in the Wind River Range, Wyoming (1968–2019): Climate and Topographic Drivers. Remote Sensing, 17(5), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050916&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Z., Sahotra, H., Ahmad, S., et al. (2025). A Distributed Machine Learning Model for Blue and Green Water Resources With Transferable Applications in Similar Climatic Zones. Water Resources Research, 61(5), e2024WR039169. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039169&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Naple, P., Skiles, S. M., Lang, O. I., et al. (2025). Dust on Snow Radiative Forcing and Contribution to Melt in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(5), e2024GL112757. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112757&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norris, J., Rahimi, S., Huang, L., Bass, B., Thackeray, C. W., and Hall, A. (2025). Uncertainty of 21st Century western U.S. snowfall loss derived from regional climate model large ensemble. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 8(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01002-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Puente, P., Rajagopalan, B., and Condon, L. E. (2025). Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 648, 132386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Raleigh, M. S., Small, E. E., Bair, E. H., Wobus, C., and Rittger, K. (2025). Snow monitoring at strategic locations improves water supply forecasting more than basin-wide mapping. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02660-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ratterman, C., Zhang, W., Affram, G., &amp;amp; Bean, B. (2025). Improving CFSv2 Snow Water Equivalent Forecasts in the Colorado River Basin with Generalized Analog Regression Downscaling. Weather and Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-23-0196.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R., et al. (2025). Light Absorbing Particles Deposited to Snow Cover Across the Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado, 2013–2016: Interannual Variations From Multiple Natural and Anthropogenic Sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 130(2), e2024JD041676. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041676&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K., Prairie, J., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2025). Developing Storylines of Plausible Future Streamflow and Generating a New Warming‐Driven Declining Streamflow Ensemble: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 61(1), e2024WR038618. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038618&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., Rateb, A., Conway, B., Sorensen, K., Udall, B., and Reedy, R. C. (2025). Multidecadal drought impacts on the Lower Colorado Basin with implications for future management. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 6(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02149-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schwat, E., Hogan, D., Paw U, K. T., et al. (2025). Estimating snow sublimation in complex terrain: a season of intensive field measurements and the role of vertical water vapor flux divergence. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 26(10), 1455-1473. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-25-0022.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Woodburn, E. R., Gardner, W. P., Dennedy-Frank, J. P., &amp;amp; Williams, K. H. (2025). Matrix Diffusion Controls Mountain Hillslope Groundwater Ages and Inferred Storage Dynamics. Groundwater. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13475&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Masbruch, M. D., Knight, J. E., et al. (2025). Hydrologic response of groundwater and streamflow to natural and anthropogenic drivers of change in headwaters of the upper Colorado River basin during recent wet (1982–1999) and drought (2000–2022) conditions. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 60, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102554&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, B., Bass, B., Hall, A., Rahimi, S., and Huang, L. (2025). Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations. Nature Communications, 16(1), 8625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63635-4 [https://wrf-cmip6-noversioning.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html#ben_temp/d02_9km/Sims_LSM_Only/0_Final_post_BC/ Link to GCM data (CMIP6-WRF) used in paper]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wolf, M. A., Jamison, L., Strong, C., and Brooks, P. D. (2025). Periodic Variability in Baseflow in Headwater Streams of the Upper Colorado River: Implications for Runoff Efficiency. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 61(2), e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yue, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., and Yang, T. (2025). A Machine Learning-Based Water Supply Forecasting Model to Quantify the Impact of Snow Water Equivalent on Seasonal Streamflow Variability Over the Western U.S. Journal of Hydrology, 660, 133465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133465&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zanewich, K. P., and Rood, S. B. (2025). Regional Differences in High Elevation Snowpack Decline Along the North American Rocky Mountains. Hydrological Processes, 39(5), e70153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70153&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B., Hansen, K., and Sorensen, K. (2025). Policy Note: Tough Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Water Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24710024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River Research Group. (2025). Colorado River Insights, 2025: Dancing with Deadpool. (64 pp.) Getches-Wilkinson Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/ColoradoRiverInsights2025DancingWithDeadpool&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fernandes, S., Fernandes, G. W., Pereira, C. C., Raty, J., and Wheeler, K. (2025). Reimagining river governance: Insights from the Colorado river crisis. BioScience, biaf037. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hovis, M., Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., et al. (2025). Illuminating the collective learning continuum in the Colorado River Basin Science-Policy Forums. Environmental Policy and Governance, 35(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., Tara, K. H., and Fleck, J. (2025). A Horse Named “Stream Depletion Theory”: The History and Negotiation of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. Natural Resources Journal, 65(1), 69–122.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2025). Alternatives Report: Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for Lake Powell and Lake Mead (46 pp.). Bureau of Reclamation Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/post2026/alternatives/Post-2026_Alternatives_Report_20250117_508.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robison, J. A. (2025). Relational River: Arizona v. Navajo Nation &amp;amp; the Colorado. UCLA Law Review, 72, 87. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4732273&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J., Castle, A., Fleck, J., Kuhn, E., Sorensen, K., and Tara, K. (2025). Analysis of Colorado River Basin Storage Suggests Need For Immediate Action (13 pp.). Getches-Wilkinson Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/670&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Singhal, A., Szinai, J. K., Yates, D., and Jones, A. D. (2025). Evaluating How Climate Adaptation Measures Affect the Interconnected Water‐Energy Resource Systems of the Western United States. Earth’s Future, 13(7), e2025EF006072. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006072&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sorensen, K., Porter, S., Kuhn, E., and Campbell, C. (2025). Enduring Solutions on the Colorado River Part II: Floating Pools and Grand Bargains (13 pp.). Kyl Center for Water Policy, Arizona State University. https://issuu.com/asuwattscollege/docs/floating_pools_grand_bargains&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, B., Bass, B., Hall, A., Rahimi, S., and Huang, L. (2025). Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations. Nature Communications, 16(1), 8625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63635-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Womble, P., Gorelick, S. M., Thompson, B. H., and Hernandez-Suarez, J. S. (2025). A strategic environmental water rights market for Colorado River reallocation. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01585-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use===&lt;br /&gt;
---- &lt;br /&gt;
Silber-Coats, N., Elias, E., Fernald, K., &amp;amp; Gagliardi, M. (2025). Evaluating alternative crops as a solution to water stress in the U.S. Southwest. Agricultural Water Management, 312, 109439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109439&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arienzo, M. M., Gleason, K. E., Sexstone, G. A., et al. (2025). Latitudinal gradients of snow contamination in the Rocky Mountains associated with anthropogenic sources. Environmental Pollution, 373, 126094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126094&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carey, C., Deemer, B., Gibney, N., et al. (2025). Assessing risk for enhanced cyanobacteria, phytoplankton, and pathogens with changes in water level regime with potential application to Lake Powell and Lake Mead: A mixed methods literature review. National Park Service. https://doi.org/10.36967/2307521&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Reibold, R. H., et al. (2025). Low water levels interact with reservoir aging to increase the severity of summertime metalimnion dissolved oxygen minima in Lake Powell, desert Southwest USA. Inland Waters, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2025.2476309&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Graves, B. P., Ralph, T. J., and Morgan, A. M. (2025). Channel breakdown and avulsion in arroyos feeding the Little Colorado River, Arizona, USA. Geomorphology, 468, 109501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Holmes, R., Kroepsch, A., and Singha, K. (2025). River Communities, Disaster Science, and the Politics of Water Safety: Understanding Water Quality Debates in the Aftermath of the Gold King Mine Spill. Environmental Communication, 19(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2390064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahmoud, M. F., Arabi, M., and Pallickara, S. (2025). Harnessing ensemble Machine learning models for improved salinity prediction in large river basin scales. Journal of Hydrology, 652, 132691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132691&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCleskey, R. B., Cravotta, C. A., Miller, M. P., et al. (2025). Specific conductance and water type as a proxy model for salinity and total dissolved solids measurements in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Applied Geochemistry, 184, 106358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106358&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Newman, C. P., Cowie, R., Wilkin, R. T., and Navarre-Sitchler, A. (2025). Tracing metal sources and groundwater flow paths in the Upper Animas River watershed using rare earth elements and stable isotopes. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 25(1), geochem2024-023. https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2024-023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, J. R., Larsen, I. J., Winnick, M. J., Marmolejo‐Cossío, J. M., and Williams, K. H. (2025). Linking Surface Processes, Solute Generation, and CO2 Budgets Across Lithological and Land Cover Gradients in Rocky Mountain Watersheds. Water Resources Research, 61(4), e2023WR036850. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036850&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Berkelhammer, M., Page, G. F. M., Zurek, F., et al. (2025). Canopy structure modulates the sensitivity of subalpine forest stands to interannual snowpack and precipitation variability. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29(3), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-701-2025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Yackulic, C. B., Eppehimer, D. E., Bestgen, K. R., Jones, M. T., and Michaud, C. (2025). Estimating drivers and identifying uncertainties in smallmouth bass population dynamics in an invaded river network. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 82, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0183&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2025). Daily Fluctuating Flows Affect Riparian Plant Species Distributions From Local to Regional Scales. Applied Vegetation Science, 28(3), e70033. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.70033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cooper, D. J., Schweiger, E. W., Shaw, J. R., et al. (2025). Rapid riparian ecosystem decline in Rocky Mountain National Park. Conservation Biology, e70053. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Enriquez, A., Bagstad, K., Dahm, K., Torregrosa, A., and Schuster, R. (2025). Scoping decision-maker needs and science availability to support regional natural capital accounting in the U.S. Colorado River Basin. One Ecosystem, 10, e147848. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.10.e147848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D. E., Yackulic, C. B., Bruckerhoff, L. A., et al. (2025). Declining reservoir elevations following a two-decade drought increase water temperatures and non-native fish passage facilitating a downstream invasion. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 82, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hedden, S. C., Albrecht, B., Rogers, R. J., et al. (2025). Do conservation actions improve native fish populations? Differences between managed and unmanaged reaches of a desert river give insight. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, vqaf002. https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt/vqaf002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Moorhead, L. C., Pennino, M. J., Sabo, R. D., and LeDuc, S. D. (2025). Fire Retardants Are an Overlooked Source of Phosphorus to Western US Ecosystems. ACS ES&amp;amp;T Water, 5(4), 1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00966&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Ogle, K., Butterfield, B. J., et al. (2025). Hotter temperatures alter riparian plant outcomes under regulated river conditions. Ecological Monographs, 95(1), e1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1645&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Parks, S. A., Coop, J. D., and Davis, K. T. (2025). Intensifying Fire Season Aridity Portends Ongoing Expansion of Severe Wildfire in Western US Forests. Global Change Biology, 31(8), e70429. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70429&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Remke, M., Schneider, K., and Korb, J. (2025). Leafing Out: Leaf Area Index as an Indicator for Mountain Forest Recovery Following Mixed-Severity Wildfire in Southwest Colorado. Forests, 16(6), 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060872&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rogowski, D. L., Fonken, D. R., Rogers, R. J., and Albrecht, B. (2025). Consequences of a drying reservoir: Positive or negative effects on riverine fish? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 154(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/tafafs/vnaf004&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Roos, C. I., Kaib, J. M., Laluk, N. C., et al. (2025). Tree rings reveal persistent Western Apache (Ndee) fire stewardship and niche construction in the American Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(32), e2509169122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509169122&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Severson, J. P., Bishop, T. B. B., Knight, A. C., et al. (2025). Mapping ecological states in the upper Colorado River basin: Implications for fire management. Environmental Research: Ecology, 4(3), 035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664X/adf55f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Van Der Nagel, C., Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2025). Stable phytoplankton community compositions in Lake Mead (Nevada-Arizona, USA) during two decades of severe drought. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 23, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100491&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cohen, M., and Halama, K. (2025). Breathing Hazard: Air Pollution in the Salton Sea Region. Pacific Institute. https://pacinst.org/publication/breathing-hazard/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jones, B. A., Wang, J., and Fleck, J. (2025). Sending Agricultural Water to The Salton Sea to Improve Public Health? An Integrated Agri-Hydro-Health Economic Analysis. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.  https://doi.org/10.1086/737530&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhong, Q., Tong, D., Crosson, C., Zhang, Y., and Bhushan, R. (2025). Optimizing Investments in Alternative Water Infrastructure for Urban Food Production in Water Stressed Cities. Water Resources Research, 61(2), e2024WR039025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR03902&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cox, C. J., Intrieri, J. M., Butterworth, B., et al. (2024). Observations of surface energy fluxes and meteorology in the seasonally snow-covered high-elevation East River Watershed during SPLASH, 2021–2023. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-158&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heflin, S., Abel, M., Biswas, S., et al. (2024). X-Band Radar and Surface-Based Observations of Cold-Season Precipitation in Western Colorado’s Complex Terrain. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 25(10), 1501–1523. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawrence, D., Tercek, M., Runyon, A., and Wright, J. (2024). Historical and projected climate change for Grand Canyon National Park and surrounding areas. National Park Service. https://doi.org/10.36967/2301726&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lehner, F. (2024). Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research. iScience, 27(11), 111113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111113&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhuang, Y., Fu, R., Lisonbee, J., et al. (2024). Anthropogenic warming has ushered in an era of temperature-dominated droughts in the western United States. Science Advances, 10(45), eadn9389, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn9389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Babey, T., Perzan, Z., Pierce, S., et al. (2024). Mountainous Floodplain Connectivity in Response to Hydrological Transitions. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037162. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037162&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Niswonger, R. G., Ulrich, C., et al. (2024). Declining groundwater storage expected to amplify mountain streamflow reductions in a warmer world. Nature Water, 2(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00239-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dwivedi, R., Biederman, J. A., Broxton, P. D., et al. (2024). How three-dimensional forest structure regulates the amount and timing of snowmelt across a climatic gradient of snow persistence. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1374961. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1374961&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gold, D. F., Gupta, R. S., and Reed, P. M. (2024). Exploring the Spatially Compounding Multi-Sectoral Drought Vulnerabilities in Colorado’s West Slope River Basins. Earth’s Future, 12(11), e2024EF004841. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004841&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Deemer, B. R., Metcalfe, A. N., et al. (2024). eZ flow metrics: Using z-scores to estimate deviations from natural flow in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4360&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schulz, E. Y., Morrison, R. R., Bailey, R. T., et al. (2024). River corridor beads are important areas of floodplain-groundwater exchange within the Colorado River headwaters watershed. Hydrological Processes, 38(9), e15282. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15282&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sprenger, M., Carroll, R. W. H., Marchetti, D., et al. (2024). Stream water sourcing from high-elevation snowpack inferred from stable isotopes of water: A novel application of d-excess values. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(7), 1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1711-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Vano, J., Petach, T., Deems, J., et al. (2024). A Collaborative, In Situ Mountain Hydrology NASA Test Bed. Prepared for the NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program. Aspen Global Change Institute. https://doi.org/10.69925/VCBQ9771&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River Research Group. (2024). Active and Passive Water Saving Mechanisms on the Colorado River: Challenges and Opportunities. 4 pp. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/527&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Debaere, P., Li, T., Fox, S., et al. (2024). Closing Loopholes in Water Rights Systems to Save Water: The Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR036667. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036667&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P., Quinn, J., Vernon, C., &amp;amp; Thurber, T. (2024). Scenario storyline discovery for planning in multi‐actor human‐natural systems confronting change. Earth&#039;s Future, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004252&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E. (2024). The Risks and Potential Impacts of a Colorado River Compact Curtailment on Colorado River In-Basin and Transmountain Water Rights Within Colorado. Colorado Environmental Law Journal, 35(2). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/celj/vol35/iss2/4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawless, K. L., Garcia, M., and White, D. D. (2024). Institutional analysis of water governance in the Colorado River Basin, 1922–2022. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1451854. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1451854&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez, S. F., Knight, J. E., Tilman, F. D., et al. (2024). Database of surface water diversion sites and daily withdrawals for the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1980–2022. Scientific Data, 11(1), 1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04123-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perry, D., Swanson, R. K., and Springer, A. E. (2024). Policy deficiencies and contingency plans: Groundwater management implications for baseflow contributions to the Colorado River. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1444015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1444015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., and Fleck, J. (2024). It is Time to Expand the Geography of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program. White Paper No. 9; Future of the Colorado River Project, 4 pp. Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu//coloradoriver/files/news/White-Paper-9.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Seay-Fleming, C., Brown, A., Gerlak, A. K., et al. (2024). Engaging farmers in water governance in the Western United States: Lessons from the Colorado River Basin. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 6(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00203-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Terando, A., Tucker, A., Runyon, A., et al. (2024). Best Practices for Incorporating Climate Change Science into Department of Interior Analyses, Consultations, and Decision Making. Climate Adaptation Science Centers. https://doi.org/10.21429/HJGJ-J073&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Volk, J. M., Huntington, J. L., Melton, F. S., et al. (2024). Assessing the accuracy of OpenET satellite-based evapotranspiration data to support water resource and land management applications. Nature Water, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00181-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahal, A., Mendenhall, E., and Giordano, M. (2024). Water in the West: Analyzing the disconnect between farmers’ and policymakers’ perceptions of Colorado River Basin shortages in Arizona. Journal of Rural Studies, 111, 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103398&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Busse, M. M., McKibben, M. A., Stringfellow, W., Dobson, P., and Stokes-Draut, J. R. (2024). Impact of geothermal expansion and lithium extraction in the Salton Sea known geothermal resource area (SS-KGRA) on local water resources. Environmental Research Letters, 19(10), 104011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6a73&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., and Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wobus, C., Nash, C., Culp, P. W., Kelly, M., and Kennedy, K. (2024). Simplified agricultural water use accounting in the Colorado River basin using OpenET. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad984b&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bouskill, N. J., Newcomer, M., Carroll, R. , et al. (2024). A Tale of Two Catchments: Causality Analysis and Isotope Systematics Reveal Mountainous Watershed Traits That Regulate the Retention and Release of Nitrogen. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 129(3), e2023JG007532. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007532&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Topping, D. J., Salter, G., et al. (2024). Implementation of Controlled Floods for Sediment Management on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon Under Aridification. River Research and Applications, n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4374&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ridgway, P., Lane, B., Canham, H., et al. (2024). Wildfire, extreme precipitation and debris flows, oh my! Channel response to compounding disturbances in a mountain stream in the Upper Colorado Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(12), 3855–3872. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tyree, G. L., Chappell, A., Villarreal, M. L., Dhital, S., Duniway, M. C., Edwards, B. L., Faist, A. M., Nauman, T. W., &amp;amp; Webb, N. P. (2024). Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(11), 3292–3307. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5887&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Boyer, J. K., Fonken, D. R., and Rogowski, D. L. (2024). Why new scientific information is important for native fish conservation: A case study from the humpback chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;) in the Grand Canyon, U.S.A. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34(1), e4075. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4075&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallaro, M. C., and Schumann, D. A. (2024). Utility of artificial river reef structures to enhance fish habitat below a hydropeaking dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4365&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilbert, E. I., Diver, T. A., Mussmann, S. M., et al. (2024). Why Is It Too Cold? Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Cold-Water Pollution Effects on Recruitment of an Imperiled Warmwater Fish. Molecular Ecology, n/a(n/a), e17588. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17588&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Gómez-Sapiens, M., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Avian communities respond to plant and landscape composition in actively revegetated floodplains of the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107266&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hedden, C., Rogowski, D. L., Boyer, J., and Mason-Sarantopulos, L. (2024). Temporal Patterns of Fish Occurrence in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon in Response to Temperature, Largescale Drought, and Newly Exposed Habitat. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4392&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hodge, B. W., Henderson, R., and Brehme, C. E. (2024). Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4373&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Magruder, A. C., Barrile, G. M., Siddons, S., Walrath, J., and Walters, A. W. (2024). Seasonal movements between main stem and tributaries may facilitate the persistence of Roundtail Chub and Flannelmouth Sucker within an altered stream system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 153(5), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10489&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mussmann, S. M. (2024). Assembly and annotation of a chromosome-level reference genome for the endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius). G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 14(11), jkae217. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkae217&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gomez-Sapiens, M., et al. (2024). Greenness and Actual Evapotranspiration in the Unrestored Riparian Corridor of the Colorado River Delta in Response to In-Channel Water Deliveries in 2021 and 2022. Remote Sensing, 16(10), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. et al. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perkins, D. W., Wight, A., Wondzell, M., and Friedman, J. M. (2024). Riparian Vegetated Area in Pre-Dam, Post-Dam, and Environmental Flow Periods in Canyonlands National Park From 1940 to 2022. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, D. M., and Friggens, M. M. (2024). Co-production of a vulnerability assessment for aquatic and riparian ecosystems in the southwestern United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 60(6), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13240&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thaxton, R., Scott, M. L., Kemper, J. T., Rathburn, S. L., Butzke, S., &amp;amp; Friedman, J. M. (2024). Downstream decreases in water availability, tree height, canopy volume and growth rate in cottonwood forests along the Green River, southwestern USA. Ecohydrology, 17(7), e2693. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2693&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Blevins, S., Hansen, K. M., Paige, G. B., MacKinnon, A., &amp;amp; Bastian, C. T. (2024). Economic Evaluation of Water Management Alternatives in the Upper Green River Basin of Wyoming. Water, 16(12), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121685&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Frisvold, G. B., and Atla, J. (2024). Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(8), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11080125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kaczmarski, J. I., &amp;amp; Jones, B. A. (2024). The marginal generation and emissions impacts of purchased hydropower: Evidence from the Colorado River Storage Project. Energy Economics, 138, 107816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107816&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yu, G., Wright, D. B., and Davenport, F. V. (2022). Diverse Physical Processes Drive Upper-Tail Flood Quantiles in the US Mountain West. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(10), e2022GL098855. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098855&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeHoff, M. (2022). Who is in Charge of the Mud? Natural Resources Journal, 62(2), 325–339.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.coloradobasinroundtable.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado_2022-Project-Report_FINAL_no-Appendix.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4144</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4144"/>
		<updated>2025-02-06T21:55:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wiki library==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2025==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Graves, B. P., Ralph, T. J., and Morgan, A. M. (2025). Channel breakdown and avulsion in arroyos feeding the Little Colorado River, Arizona, USA. Geomorphology, 468, 109501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Puente, P., Rajagopalan, B., and Condon, L. E. (2025). Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 648, 132386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2025). Alternatives Report: Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for Lake Powell and Lake Mead (p. 46). Bureau of Reclamation Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/post2026/alternatives/Post-2026_Alternatives_Report_20250117_508.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robison, J. A. (2025). Relational River: Arizona v. Navajo Nation &amp;amp; the Colorado. UCLA Law Review, 72, 87. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4732273&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heflin, S., Abel, M., Biswas, S., et al. (2024). X-Band Radar and Surface-Based Observations of Cold-Season Precipitation in Western Colorado’s Complex Terrain. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 25(10), 1501–1523. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawrence, D., Tercek, M., Runyon, A., and Wright, J. (2024). Historical and projected climate change for Grand Canyon National Park and surrounding areas. National Park Service. https://doi.org/10.36967/2301726&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lehner, F. (2024). Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research. iScience, 27(11), 111113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111113&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhuang, Y., Fu, R., Lisonbee, J., et al. (2024). Anthropogenic warming has ushered in an era of temperature-dominated droughts in the western United States. Science Advances, 10(45), eadn9389, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn9389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Babey, T., Perzan, Z., Pierce, S., et al. (2024). Mountainous Floodplain Connectivity in Response to Hydrological Transitions. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037162. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037162&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Niswonger, R. G., Ulrich, C., et al. (2024). Declining groundwater storage expected to amplify mountain streamflow reductions in a warmer world. Nature Water, 2(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00239-0&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dwivedi, R., Biederman, J. A., Broxton, P. D., et al. (2024). How three-dimensional forest structure regulates the amount and timing of snowmelt across a climatic gradient of snow persistence. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1374961. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1374961&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gold, D. F., Gupta, R. S., and Reed, P. M. (2024). Exploring the Spatially Compounding Multi-Sectoral Drought Vulnerabilities in Colorado’s West Slope River Basins. Earth’s Future, 12(11), e2024EF004841. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004841&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Deemer, B. R., Metcalfe, A. N., et al. (2024). eZ flow metrics: Using z-scores to estimate deviations from natural flow in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4360&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schulz, E. Y., Morrison, R. R., Bailey, R. T., et al. (2024). River corridor beads are important areas of floodplain-groundwater exchange within the Colorado River headwaters watershed. Hydrological Processes, 38(9), e15282. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15282&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sprenger, M., Carroll, R. W. H., Marchetti, D., et al. (2024). Stream water sourcing from high-elevation snowpack inferred from stable isotopes of water: A novel application of d-excess values. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(7), 1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1711-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Vano, J., Petach, T., Deems, J., et al. (2024). A Collaborative, In Situ Mountain Hydrology NASA Test Bed. Prepared for the NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program. Aspen Global Change Institute. https://doi.org/10.69925/VCBQ9771&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado River Research Group. (2024). Active and Passive Water Saving Mechanisms on the Colorado River: Challenges and Opportunities. 4 pp. https://www.colorado.edu/center/gwc/media/527&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Debaere, P., Li, T., Fox, S., et al. (2024). Closing Loopholes in Water Rights Systems to Save Water: The Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR036667. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036667&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P., Quinn, J., Vernon, C., &amp;amp; Thurber, T. (2024). Scenario storyline discovery for planning in multi‐actor human‐natural systems confronting change. Earth&#039;s Future, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004252&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lawless, K. L., Garcia, M., and White, D. D. (2024). Institutional analysis of water governance in the Colorado River Basin, 1922–2022. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1451854. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1451854&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez, S. F., Knight, J. E., Tilman, F. D., et al. (2024). Database of surface water diversion sites and daily withdrawals for the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1980–2022. Scientific Data, 11(1), 1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04123-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perry, D., Swanson, R. K., and Springer, A. E. (2024). Policy deficiencies and contingency plans: Groundwater management implications for baseflow contributions to the Colorado River. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1444015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1444015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., and Fleck, J. (2024). It is Time to Expand the Geography of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program. White Paper No. 9; Future of the Colorado River Project, 4 pp. Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu//coloradoriver/files/news/White-Paper-9.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Seay-Fleming, C., Brown, A., Gerlak, A. K., et al. (2024). Engaging farmers in water governance in the Western United States: Lessons from the Colorado River Basin. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 6(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00203-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Terando, A., Tucker, A., Runyon, A., et al. (2024). Best Practices for Incorporating Climate Change Science into Department of Interior Analyses, Consultations, and Decision Making. Climate Adaptation Science Centers. https://doi.org/10.21429/HJGJ-J073&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Volk, J. M., Huntington, J. L., Melton, F. S., et al. (2024). Assessing the accuracy of OpenET satellite-based evapotranspiration data to support water resource and land management applications. Nature Water, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00181-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahal, A., Mendenhall, E., and Giordano, M. (2024). Water in the West: Analyzing the disconnect between farmers’ and policymakers’ perceptions of Colorado River Basin shortages in Arizona. Journal of Rural Studies, 111, 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103398&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Busse, M. M., McKibben, M. A., Stringfellow, W., Dobson, P., and Stokes-Draut, J. R. (2024). Impact of geothermal expansion and lithium extraction in the Salton Sea known geothermal resource area (SS-KGRA) on local water resources. Environmental Research Letters, 19(10), 104011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6a73&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., and Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wobus, C., Nash, C., Culp, P. W., Kelly, M., and Kennedy, K. (2024). Simplified agricultural water use accounting in the Colorado River basin using OpenET. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad984b&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bouskill, N. J., Newcomer, M., Carroll, R. , et al. (2024). A Tale of Two Catchments: Causality Analysis and Isotope Systematics Reveal Mountainous Watershed Traits That Regulate the Retention and Release of Nitrogen. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 129(3), e2023JG007532. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007532&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Topping, D. J., Salter, G., et al. (2024). Implementation of Controlled Floods for Sediment Management on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon Under Aridification. River Research and Applications, n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4374&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ridgway, P., Lane, B., Canham, H., et al. (2024). Wildfire, extreme precipitation and debris flows, oh my! Channel response to compounding disturbances in a mountain stream in the Upper Colorado Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(12), 3855–3872. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tyree, G. L., Chappell, A., Villarreal, M. L., Dhital, S., Duniway, M. C., Edwards, B. L., Faist, A. M., Nauman, T. W., &amp;amp; Webb, N. P. (2024). Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(11), 3292–3307. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5887&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Boyer, J. K., Fonken, D. R., and Rogowski, D. L. (2024). Why new scientific information is important for native fish conservation: A case study from the humpback chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;) in the Grand Canyon, U.S.A. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34(1), e4075. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4075&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallaro, M. C., and Schumann, D. A. (2024). Utility of artificial river reef structures to enhance fish habitat below a hydropeaking dam. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4365&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilbert, E. I., Diver, T. A., Mussmann, S. M., et al. (2024). Why Is It Too Cold? Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Cold-Water Pollution Effects on Recruitment of an Imperiled Warmwater Fish. Molecular Ecology, n/a(n/a), e17588. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17588&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Gómez-Sapiens, M., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Avian communities respond to plant and landscape composition in actively revegetated floodplains of the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107266&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hedden, C., Rogowski, D. L., Boyer, J., and Mason-Sarantopulos, L. (2024). Temporal Patterns of Fish Occurrence in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon in Response to Temperature, Largescale Drought, and Newly Exposed Habitat. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4392&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hodge, B. W., Henderson, R., and Brehme, C. E. (2024). Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4373&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Magruder, A. C., Barrile, G. M., Siddons, S., Walrath, J., and Walters, A. W. (2024). Seasonal movements between main stem and tributaries may facilitate the persistence of Roundtail Chub and Flannelmouth Sucker within an altered stream system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 153(5), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10489&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mussmann, S. M. (2024). Assembly and annotation of a chromosome-level reference genome for the endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius). G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 14(11), jkae217. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkae217&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gomez-Sapiens, M., et al. (2024). Greenness and Actual Evapotranspiration in the Unrestored Riparian Corridor of the Colorado River Delta in Response to In-Channel Water Deliveries in 2021 and 2022. Remote Sensing, 16(10), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. et al. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Perkins, D. W., Wight, A., Wondzell, M., and Friedman, J. M. (2024). Riparian Vegetated Area in Pre-Dam, Post-Dam, and Environmental Flow Periods in Canyonlands National Park From 1940 to 2022. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, D. M., and Friggens, M. M. (2024). Co-production of a vulnerability assessment for aquatic and riparian ecosystems in the southwestern United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 60(6), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13240&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thaxton, R., Scott, M. L., Kemper, J. T., Rathburn, S. L., Butzke, S., &amp;amp; Friedman, J. M. (2024). Downstream decreases in water availability, tree height, canopy volume and growth rate in cottonwood forests along the Green River, southwestern USA. Ecohydrology, 17(7), e2693. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2693&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Blevins, S., Hansen, K. M., Paige, G. B., MacKinnon, A., &amp;amp; Bastian, C. T. (2024). Economic Evaluation of Water Management Alternatives in the Upper Green River Basin of Wyoming. Water, 16(12), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121685&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Frisvold, G. B., and Atla, J. (2024). Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(8), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11080125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kaczmarski, J. I., &amp;amp; Jones, B. A. (2024). The marginal generation and emissions impacts of purchased hydropower: Evidence from the Colorado River Storage Project. Energy Economics, 138, 107816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107816&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yu, G., Wright, D. B., and Davenport, F. V. (2022). Diverse Physical Processes Drive Upper-Tail Flood Quantiles in the US Mountain West. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(10), e2022GL098855. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098855&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeHoff, M. (2022). Who is in Charge of the Mud? Natural Resources Journal, 62(2), 325–339.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.coloradobasinroundtable.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado_2022-Project-Report_FINAL_no-Appendix.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4110</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4110"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T03:28:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wiki library==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P., Quinn, J., Vernon, C., &amp;amp; Thurber, T. (2024). Scenario storyline discovery for planning in multi‐actor human‐natural systems confronting change. Earth&#039;s Future, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004252&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Terando, A., Tucker, A., Runyon, A., et al. (2024). Best Practices for Incorporating Climate Change Science into Department of Interior Analyses, Consultations, and Decision Making. Climate Adaptation Science Centers. https://doi.org/10.21429/HJGJ-J073&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., &amp;amp; Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Flessa, K. W., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., and Didan, K. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4006</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4006"/>
		<updated>2024-09-24T21:10:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Reed, P., Quinn, J., Vernon, C., &amp;amp; Thurber, T. (2024). Scenario storyline discovery for planning in multi‐actor human‐natural systems confronting change. Earth&#039;s Future, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004252&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., &amp;amp; Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Flessa, K. W., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., and Didan, K. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4004</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=4004"/>
		<updated>2024-09-11T20:25:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dhital, S., Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., et al. (2024). Synoptic Analysis and WRF-Chem Model Simulation of Dust Events in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(13), e2023JD040650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040650&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Horel, J. D., and Powell, J. T. (2024). Analysis and Prediction of Summer Rainfall over Southwestern Utah. Weather and Forecasting, 39(7), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0018.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, T., and Villarini, G. (2024). Projected changes in daily precipitation, temperature and wet-bulb temperature across Arizona using statistically downscaled CMIP6 climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 44(6), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8436&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
King, K. E., Cook, E. R., Anchukaitis, K. J., et al. (2024). Increasing prevalence of hot drought across western North America since the 16th century. Science Advances, 10(4), eadj4289. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4289&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
LaPlante, M. D., Deng, L., Dalanhese, L., and Wang, S.-Y. (2024). Ocean Temperatures Do Not Account for a Record-Setting Winter in the U.S. West. Atmosphere, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030284&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salamanca-Palou, F., Svoma, B., Walter, J., et al. (2024). Modeling Salt-Verde Watershed Winter Precipitation Using Convection-Permitting WRF-Simulations With Water Vapor Tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129(12), e2024JD041029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Kennedy, D., et al. (2024). Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2302480120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302480120&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wallace, B., and Minder, J. R. (2024). The North American Monsoon precipitation response to climate warming at convection-permitting scales. Climate Dynamics, 62(1), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06920-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederstrom, C. J., Vivoni, E. R., Mascaro, G., and Svoma, B. (2024). Forest Treatment Effects on Watershed Responses Under Warming. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035627&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Kongoli, C., and Pan, M. (2024). The Role of Forcing and Parameterization in Improving Snow Simulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using the National Water Model. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR035303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035303&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hogan, D., and Lundquist, J. D. (2024). Recent Upper Colorado River Streamflow Declines Driven by Loss of Spring Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(16), e2024GL109826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109826&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, Z. F., Stuivenvolt-Allen, J., Mahan, H., and Meyer, J. D. D. (2024). Upper Colorado River Streamﬂow Dependencies on Summertime Synoptic Circulations and Hydroclimate Variability. J. Hydrometeorology, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0053.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., and Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thiros, N. E., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Sprenger, M., et al. (2024). Old-aged groundwater contributes to mountain hillslope hydrologic dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 635, 131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131193&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thota, S., Nassar, A., Filali Boubrahimi, S., Hamdi, S. M., and Hosseinzadeh, P. (2024). Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrology, 11(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11050066&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson, D. C. (2024). Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake and Reservoir Management, 40(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2286659&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joyce, S. (2024). Tribal water sovereignty: Authorizing Indian water marketing in the Colorado Basin. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 35, 165–181. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/JOYCE-FINAL.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lisk, M. D., Grogan, D. S., Zuidema, S., et al. (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) v.1. Scientific Data, 11(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03434-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Slosson, M. (2024). Force Majeure and the Law of the Colorado River: The Confluence of Climate Change, Contracts, and the Constitution. University of Colorado Law Review, 95(3), 709–750. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol95/iss3/5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribal Communities (UACW). (2024). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Funding Handbook for Access to Clean Drinking Water by Native American Tribes. https://tribalcleanwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UACW-Funding-Handbook_FINAL_July-2024-1.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yates, D., Szinai, J. K., and Jones, A. D. (2024). Modeling the Water Systems of the Western US to Support Climate‐Resilient Electricity System Planning. Earth’s Future, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003220&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Harris, L. (2024). Farmer response to policy induced water reductions: Evidence from the Colorado River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 125, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ruddell, B. L., &amp;amp; Rushforth, R. (2024). Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: Benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., and Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating catchment-scale sediment storage in a large river basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Manning, A. H., Petach, T. N., Runkel, R. L., and McKnight, D. M. (2024). Climate‐Driven Increases in Stream Metal Concentrations in Mineralized Watersheds Throughout the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research, 60, 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036062&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Putman, A. L., McIlwain, H. E., Rumsey, C. A., and Marston, T. M. (2024). Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 52, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101673&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bernard, R. F., and Minckley, T. A. (2024). Flying by the river side: Survey of bat distributions and environmental contexts along a 1000-mile river corridor, Green and Colorado Rivers, USA. Diversity and Distributions, 30(5), e13842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13842&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fairfax, E., Whipple, A., Wheaton, J. M., et al. (2024). Impacts of beaver dams on riverscape burn severity during megafires in the Rocky Mountain region, western United States. In J. L. Florsheim, A. P. O’Dowd, and A. Chin, Biogeomorphic Responses to Wildfire in Fluvial Ecosystems (pp. 131–151). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2024.2562(07)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Giardina, M., Korman, J., Yard, M. D., et al. (2024). A literature review and hypsometric analysis to support decisions on trout management flows on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam (Report 2024–1033; Open-File Report, 50 pp.). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20241033&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marsh, P. C., Dowling, T. E., Turner, T. F., Osborne, M. J., and Kesner, B. R. (2024). Maturation of an off-channel habitat concept to conserve native fishes in the Lower Colorado River. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 15. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116andcontext=mwnan&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Flessa, K. W., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., and Didan, K. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Riepe, T. B., Hooley-Underwood, Z. E., and Johnson, M. (2024). Thermal Tolerance of Larval Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnis Acclimated to Three Temperatures. Fishes, 9(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9050181&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Invasive_mussels&amp;diff=3993</id>
		<title>Invasive mussels</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Invasive_mussels&amp;diff=3993"/>
		<updated>2024-08-12T20:29:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CAP_InvasiveMussles.jpeg|thumb|550px|Figure 1. Quagga mussels encrust an access ladder in the Central Arizona Project aqueduct.&lt;br /&gt;
 (Image Source: [https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/822103f8847b458f8bd832549719c86e Central Arizona Project, Aquatic Invasive Species in the CAP])]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two related species of freshwater mollusks native to Eastern Europe, quagga mussels (&#039;&#039;Dreissena bugensis&#039;&#039;) and zebra mussels (&#039;&#039;Dreissena polymorpha&#039;&#039;), have now become damaging invasive species across the eastern and central United States, in parts of California, and in much of the Colorado River Basin (Figure 2). It is believed that both mussel species arrived in the Great Lakes in the 1980s via ships from Europe that inadvertently carried them in ballast water tanks. Both the mussel adults and larvae (&#039;&#039;veligers&#039;&#039;) can also attach themselves to boat hulls, and the transport of recreational boats from a mussel-infested water body to a previously uninfested one has driven the spread of mussels within the U.S., and to the Colorado River Basin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once established in a new water body, these invasive mussels attach themselves to any available surface by the thousands (Figure 1), encrusting, clogging, and otherwise impairing infrastructure for water supply and hydropower. Invasive mussels also degrade recreational opportunities in infested water bodies and rivers, including the need for time-consuming boat inspections and decontamination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the process of their filter-feeding, quagga and zebra mussels also filter large volumes of water–about 1 liter per day per individual. This disrupts the aquatic food web by decreasing the availability of zooplankton for native species, and increased water clarity–which, counterintuitively, can contribute to proliferation of aquatic weeds. The invasive mussels also outcompete native mussels, and harm other species by attaching to their bodies and crowding them out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quagga and zebra mussels have some predators in the Colorado River system, such as Redear sunfish, smallmouth bass, and crayfish. These predators offer some measure of biological population control, but also a mechanism for the toxins and microorganisms found in the mussels to move up the food chain and bioaccumulate in larger fish and birds, and potentially in humans too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the mid-2000s, Federal, state, and local water agencies and natural resource agencies in the Basin have spent many millions of dollars annually on detection, monitoring, and mitigation of invasive mussels to contain their spread. The monitoring methods include analyzing water samples with microscopy to detect veligers, using gene sequencing of environmental DNA (eDNA) to confirm species presence, placing substrates (e.g., plastic disks) in waters to check for mussel attachment, and visually inspecting shorelines and infrastructure. Hundreds of inspection stations have been set up at lakes and reservoirs throughout the basin to check recreational boats entering and/or leaving the water, and at some stations, to also decontaminate vessels with scalding water. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of their fast proliferation and hardiness, once established in a water body, invasive mussels are very difficult to control, let alone eradicate. Aqueducts and reservoirs can be dewatered, which eventually dessicates the mussels, but this is often infeasible. Biocidal agents (e.g., chlorine, copper compounds) can be applied to the water to kill mussels directly, but this is only practical for smaller waterbodies, and can have deleterious effects on other species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USGS_Mussel_map.png|thumb|650px|Figure 2. Reported quagga mussel and zebra mussel occurrences in the U.S., updated in September 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
 (Image Source: US Geological Survey)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quagga Mussels====&lt;br /&gt;
Originally found in the Ukraine, the quagga mussel varies from pea-sized to quarter-sized as an adult. They have variable coloration and can be hard to distinguish from zebra mussels. Quagga mussels were first discovered in the Colorado River Basin in 2007 in Lake Mead, Lake Mohave, and Lake Havasu. In 2012, quagga mussels were found in Lake Powell. Quagga mussels are now established throughout the Colorado River system below Lake Mead, including in the Central Arizona Project and all infrastructure in California receiving raw Colorado River water. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is great concern about quagga mussels spreading in the Upper Basin beyond Lake Powell. Individual mussels have been found in several reservoirs in western Colorado and in northeastern and southwestern Utah, but self-sustaining populations have so far failed to establish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Zebra Mussels==== &lt;br /&gt;
Zebra mussels are native to southeastern Russia and while also variable in size, they are generally smaller than quagga mussels. They typically have distinctive dark stripes on their shells. In the Colorado River Basin, zebra mussels have thus far established only in Highline Lake near Grand Junction, in 2022. Zebra mussels were found in 2008 in Electric Lake (Utah) and in Grand Lake (Colorado), but did not establish. In July 2024, Zebra mussel veligers were observed in the Government Highline Canal and in the mainstem of the Colorado River between De Beque Canyon and Grand Junction (Colorado); no adult zebra mussels have yet been found in these areas. In lakes elsewhere in which quagga and zebra mussels do co-occur, quagga mussels tend to outcompete zebra mussels and have broader habitats, extending to deeper, colder regions of the lake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://nas.er.usgs.gov/about/default.aspx USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species (NAS) database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The NAS database is a central repository for accurate and spatially referenced reports of nonindigenous aquatic species in the U.S. Figure 2 is based on data from the NAS. &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://nas.er.usgs.gov/viewer/omap.aspx?SpeciesID=95 Quagga mussels]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://nas.er.usgs.gov/viewer/omap.aspx?SpeciesID=5 Zebra mussels]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://data.usbr.gov/catalog Reclamation RISE database] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation’s RISE database includes invasive mussel monitoring data, and reports on Reclamation projects investigating mussel detection and control methods; enter “mussel” in the search bar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.nps.gov/glca/learn/nature/mussel-update.htm NPS Glen Canyon Mussel Updates]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Glen Canyon National Recreation Area maintains mussel updates on its website, including current watercraft decontamination strategies and requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://invasivemusselcollaborative.net/project-database-with-map/ Invasive Mussel Collaborative ]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Invasive Mussel Collaborative collates ongoing prevention and removal projects across the United States, including several which extend through parts of the Colorado River basin.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3992</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3992"/>
		<updated>2024-07-30T16:33:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Wheeler, K. G., Smith, R., &amp;amp; Baker, S. (2024). Quantifying and Classifying Streamflow Ensembles Using a Broad Range of Metrics for an Evidence‐Based Analysis: Colorado River Case Study. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2024WR037225. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037225&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., Vivoni, E. R., Whitney, K. M., Xiao, M., &amp;amp; Mascaro, G. (2024). On the Sensitivity of Future Hydrology in the Colorado River to the Selection of the Precipitation Partitioning Method. Water Resources Research, 60(6), e2023WR035801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035801&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kemper, J. T., Knox, R., Raffae, M., Schulz, E., Bailey, R., Morrison, R. R., &amp;amp; Wohl, E. (2024). Estimating CATCHMENT‐SCALE sediment storage in a large River Basin, Colorado River, USA. River Research and Applications, rra.4300. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4300&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Flessa, K. W., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., &amp;amp; Didan, K. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
González-Sargas, E., Meehan, T. D., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., et al. (2024). Bird community response to one decade of riparian restoration along the Colorado River delta in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 205, 107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107291&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Sall, I., Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Flessa, K. W., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., &amp;amp; Didan, K. (2024). Effect of water delivery and irrigation for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Restoration Ecology, e14226. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3988</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3988"/>
		<updated>2024-05-06T17:41:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bolinger, R. A., Lukas, J. J., Schumacher, R. S., and Goble, P. E. (2024). Climate Change in Colorado, 3rd edition. Colorado State University, https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/237323&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoerling, M. P., Eischeid, J. K., Diaz, H. F., Rajagopolan, B., and Kuhn, E. (2024). Critical Effects of Precipitation on Future Colorado River Flow. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0617.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lundquist, J. D., Vano, J., Gutmann, E., et al. (2024). Sublimation of Snow. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0191.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., et al. (2024). Can we rely on drought‐ending “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin? JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13204&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., and Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., and Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact. University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 49: No. 2, Article 6. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/udlr/vol49/iss2/6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., et al. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., et al. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baniya, A., Goldy, C. J., Ardpairin, J., et al. (2024). Canine Schistosomiasis in the West Coast: Heterobilharzia americana in Two Natural Intermediate Hosts Found in the Colorado River, California. Pathogens, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030245&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., and Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., and Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., and Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Science_and_applications&amp;diff=3930</id>
		<title>Science and applications</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Science_and_applications&amp;diff=3930"/>
		<updated>2024-04-16T16:10:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki covers a broad set of topics pertaining to science that is relevant and/or applied to Colorado River management, as well as specific applications of the science, such as streamflow forecasting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each page contains at least the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*Summary description of the topic&lt;br /&gt;
*The topic&#039;s relevance to Colorado River water management&lt;br /&gt;
*Annotated links to datasets, tools, and other information resources on that topic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the list below, the bolded items are links to active Wiki pages on that topic. The other items are planned future pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We welcome your help in building out the Wiki, by&lt;br /&gt;
*Writing up a page on a topic already identified below or a different topic&lt;br /&gt;
*Alerting us to new publications, datasets, tools, and other technical resources&lt;br /&gt;
*Reviewing existing pages and sending us feedback&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Topics==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Cross-cutting reports&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2020 CRB State of the Science]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2018 CRB Ten Tribes Partnership Tribal Water Study]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2012 Colorado River Basin Study]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Weather and climate&#039;&#039;&#039;				&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Climate patterns and variability]]&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Recent climate change]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Weather and climate monitoring]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Weather and climate forecasts]]&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Projected future climate]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Colorado River extremes]]&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hydrology and water availability&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
*Water balance and basin water budget			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Snowpack]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Soil moisture]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evapotranspiration (ET)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*Groundwater			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Streamflow]]&#039;&#039;&#039;				&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Paleohydrology]]&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
*Hydrologic variability and trends	&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Seasonal streamflow forecasts]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*Droughts			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Floods]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*Channel dynamics			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hydrologic modeling]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Projected future hydrology]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Water operations and planning&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Reservoirs and infrastructure				&lt;br /&gt;
*Operating guidelines and rules &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[River system models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;		&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Colorado River Mid-term Modeling System (CRMMS)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*Planning approaches			&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Water Use&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Consumptive uses and losses]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Agricultural water use]]&#039;&#039;&#039;				&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Municipal water use]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Reservoir evaporation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
**Channel and bank losses					&lt;br /&gt;
*Instream flows 		&lt;br /&gt;
*Demand accounting and scenarios				&lt;br /&gt;
*Future basin demand				&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Water quality&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Salinity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;				&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Metals and acid mine drainage]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Other contaminants			&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Geomorphology and sediment&#039;&#039;&#039;	&lt;br /&gt;
*Erosion and sediment sources&lt;br /&gt;
*Riverbed sediment dynamics			&lt;br /&gt;
*Reservoir sedimentation		&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Ecosystems and environment&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*Vegetation change		&lt;br /&gt;
*Wildfires		&lt;br /&gt;
*Insect infestations and disease			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Tamarisk and invasive plants]]&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Threatened and endangered fish species]]&#039;&#039;&#039; 	&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Invasive mussels]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Traditional Ecological Knowledge				&lt;br /&gt;
*Salton Sea		&lt;br /&gt;
*Colorado River Delta		&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Societal and economic issues&#039;&#039;&#039;			&lt;br /&gt;
*Benefits of water&lt;br /&gt;
*Impacts of shortage and drought		&lt;br /&gt;
*Social inequity and vulnerability				&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3929</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3929"/>
		<updated>2024-04-09T20:25:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., &amp;amp; Smith, R. (2024). Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(3), 05023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bonham, N., Kasprzyk, J., Zagona, E., &amp;amp; Rajagopalan, B. (2024). Subsampling and space-filling metrics to test ensemble size for robustness analysis with a demonstration in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 172, 105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105933&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., &amp;amp; Gangopadhyay, S. (2024). Past and Projected Future Droughts in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(5), e2023GL107978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., &amp;amp; Zagona, E. (2024). Long-Lead Forecasting of Runoff Season Flows in the Colorado River Basin Using a Random Forest Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(4), 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6167&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L., Dhakal, S., Sangha, L. S., Rushforth, R. R., Wei, D., Ruddell, B. L., Davis, K. F., Hernandez-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solis, S., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2024). New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 5(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01291-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Griffiths, R.E., Topping, D.J., and Unema, J.A. (2024). Changes in sand storage in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park from July 2017 through June 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2023–1093, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20231093.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., Hess, M. D., McDonnell, M. C., &amp;amp; Jones, D. K. (2024). Temporal variability in irrigated land and climate influences on salinity loading across the Upper Colorado River Basin, 1986-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad18dd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., &amp;amp; Palmquist, E. C. (2024). Divergent physiological responses of hydric and mesic riparian plant species to a Colorado River experimental flow. Plant Ecology, 225(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01382-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grand, J., Meehan, T. D., DeLuca, W. V., Morton, J., Pitt, J., et al., (2024). Strategic restoration planning for land birds in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119755&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., &amp;amp; Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huizar, L., Díaz, S., Lansey, K., &amp;amp; Arnold, R. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basin: Water, Energy, and Recreation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 150(4), 04024004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7505&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Marrinan, E. (2024). One Hundred Years Past, One Hundred Years Forward: The Legacy of the Colorado River Compact.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., Holway, J., &amp;amp; Sabo, J. L. (2024). A framework for river recovery in Anthropocene rivers undergoing regime shift: Application to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. In Resilience and Riverine Landscapes (pp. 519–544). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91716-2.00018-2&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3928</id>
		<title>New research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=New_research&amp;diff=3928"/>
		<updated>2024-04-09T20:10:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
This section of the Wiki highlights new (2020- ) research publications relevant to the management of water and related resources in the Colorado River Basin: peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, agency reports, and other documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, these publications are listed by year of publication and organized by topic. Some publications are listed under more than one topic. A stable link to the online publication is provided at the end of each listing; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;A note on paywalls:&#039;&#039; While open access research has become much more prevalent in recent years, many of the journal articles listed below sit behind paywalls. If you don&#039;t have personal or institutional access to that journal/article, you will only be able to view the abstract; viewing or downloading the full text requires a payment (typically exorbitant). If that happens, first, enter the title of the article in [https://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] and check if a PDF has been posted elsewhere on the web by an author or other person. If one hasn&#039;t been posted, then look at the top of the article&#039;s homepage for the &#039;&#039;corresponding author&#039;&#039; (not always the first author), and email that person to obtain a copy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selected publications whose titles are &#039;&#039;&#039;bold links&#039;&#039;&#039; below have a dedicated page on this Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Searchable database of publications==&lt;br /&gt;
All of the new (2020- ) publications listed below, plus another 400+ earlier publications that were used as references for the [[2020 CRB State of the Science]] report, can also be viewed in [https://www.zotero.org/groups/4274378/colorado_river_science_wiki/library &#039;&#039;&#039;this searchable online database&#039;&#039;&#039;] (a [https://zotero.org Zotero] library). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The library allows users to view the bibliographic information like shown below, plus the abstract for many publications, and to search by author, year, or keyword. Links are provided to the vast majority of these publications; for journal articles, the link goes to the article&#039;s homepage at the publisher&#039;s website, where users may encounter a paywall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2024==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2023==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Rahimi, S., Hall, A. (2023). Aridification of Colorado River Basin’s Snowpack Regions Has Driven Water Losses Despite Ameliorating Effects of Vegetation. Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033454. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033454&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., Sexstone, G. A., Putman, A. L., et al. (2023). High Resolution SnowModel Simulations Reveal Future Elevation‐Dependent Snow Loss and Earlier, Flashier Surface Water Input for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth&#039;s Future, 11(2), e2022EF003092.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003092&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuo, Y., Kim, H., &amp;amp; Lehner, F. (2023). Anthropogenic Aerosols Contribute to the Recent Decline in Precipitation Over the U.S. Southwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL105389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105389&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McEvoy, D., and Hatchett, B. (2023). Spring Heat Waves Drive Record Western United States Snow Melt in 2021. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bd&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and Carroll, R. (2023). Evaluating Three Decades of Precipitation in the Upper Colorado River Basin from a High-Resolution Regional Climate Model. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2023, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stone, L., Strong, C., Bai, H., Reichler, T., McCabe, G., and Brooks, P. D. (2023). Atlantic-Pacific influence on western U.S. hydroclimate and water resources. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00471-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D. (2023). Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1771-1789. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1771-2023&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
de Boer, G., White, A., Cifelli, R., et al. (2023). Supporting advancement in weather and water prediction in the upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(10), E1853-E1874. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Currier, W., Wood, A., Mizukami, N., et al. (2023). Vegetation representation influences projected streamflow changes in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0143.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gianniny, G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2023). Dewatered Rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Center for Colorado River Studies. https://www.scribd.com/document/653051819/gianniny-factsheet#&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goble, P. E., and Schumacher, R. S. (2023). On the Sources of Water Supply Forecast Error in Western Colorado. Journal of Hydrometeorology 24(12):2321–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-23-0004.1.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Yoon, J., Reed, P., et al. (2023). Exploring the Consistency of Water Scarcity Inferences between Large-Scale Hydrologic and Node-Based Water System Model Representations of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(2):04022081. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5522&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A. J., Bjarke, N. R., and Livneh, B. (2023). A 21st‐Century perspective on snow drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13095&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hosseinzadeh, P., Ayman N., Soukaina F., and Shah M.. (2023). ML-Based Streamflow Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Climate Variables Time Series Data. Hydrology 10(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020029&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lachniet, M. S., Du, X., Dee, S., et al. (2023). Elevated Grand Canyon groundwater recharge during the warm Early Holocene. Nature Geoscience, 16(10), 915–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01272-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lynker. (2023). Colorado Airborne Snow Measurement Program: Water Year 2022 Streamflow Forecast Review. Report to Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, June 2023, 63 pp. https://coloradoriverscience.org/images/6/6e/CASM_WY22_Streamflow_Forecasting_Review_%28Lynker%29.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K., Vivoni, E.,  Bohn, T. et al. (2023). Spatial Attribution of Declining Colorado River Streamflow under Future Warming. Journal of Hydrology, 129125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2023). Extended Seasonal Prediction of Spring Precipitation over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Climate Dynamics 60(5):1815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06422-x&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Craig, R. K. (2023). California Exceptionalism in the Colorado River: A Brief History and Implications for the Future. University of Southern California, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 23-8. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.4420426.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dahm, K., Hawbaker, T., Frus, R et al. (2023). Colorado River Basin Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology Project—Science strategy: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1502). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1502 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Andrews, C. M., Strock, et al. (2023). Over half a century record of limnology data from Lake Powell, desert southwest United States: From reservoir filling to present day (1964–2021). Limnology and Oceanography Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10310&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Grant, G. E. (2023). A watershed moment for western US dams. Water Resources Research, 59(10), e2023WR035646. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035646&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grigg, N. S. (2023). Colorado River Basin: Conflict management under hydrologic stress and institutional gridlock. International Journal of River Basin Management. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., and Tietjen, T. (2023). Lake management under severe drought: Lake Mead, Nevada/Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59(2), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13090&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Herman-Mercer, N., Bair, L., Hines, et al. (2023). Human factors used to estimate and forecast water supply and demand in the Upper Colorado River Basin (No. 2023-5015). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, Lawrence J. (2023). The 1922 Colorado River Compact at 100. Western Legal History, 33(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4526135&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pflugfelder, E. H., Amidon, T. R., Sackey, D. J., and Richards, D. P. (2023). Expanding the Scope and Scale of Risk in TPC: Water Access and the Colorado River Basin. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210194&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Yackulic, C. B., and Kuhn, E. (2023). The Colorado River water crisis: Its origin and the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1672&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13749-280105&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5905&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Whitney, K. M., Vivoni, E. R., and White, D. D. (2023). Enhancing the accessibility and interactions of regional hydrologic projections for water managers. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software, 167, 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hernández-Cruz, A., Sandoval-Solís, S., Mendoza-Espinosa, L. G., et al. (2023). Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(9), https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A., Pitt, J., Keaton Wilson, J. et al. (2023). A Survey of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Decree Accounting Reports in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001626&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H. A., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-induced resource scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its implications for water supply and the environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(5), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. (2023). Characterization of streamflow and nutrient occurrence in the upper White River Basin, Colorado, 1980–2020 (No. 2022-5112). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2022/5112/sir20225112.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Variability in Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids along the Colorado River. Hydrology, 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Krolczyk, E., and J. C. Schmidt. 2023. Sediment Delivery to Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Sediment/SedimentDeliveryToLakePowellAndLakeMead2023Krolczyk.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., and Omana Smith, E. (2023). Quantifying the contributions of tributaries to large‐river fish populations through mark‐recapture modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, nafm.10971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10971&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kluender, E., and Bestgen, K. (2023). A Small Warm Tributary Provides Prespawning Resources for Colorado Pikeminnow in a Cold Dam-Regulated River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-025&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Sall, I. et al. (2023). Riparian Plant Evapotranspiration and Consumptive Use for Selected Areas of the Little Colorado River Watershed on the Navajo Nation. Remote Sensing 15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010052&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Srinivasan, J., and Schoon, M. (2023). Recovery or continued resuscitation? A clinical diagnosis of Colorado River sub-basin recovery programs. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2229802&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson, S. K. V., Pilkington, L. H., Berghel, K. M., Chiquoine, L. P., and Abella, S. R. (2023). Seed banks and seed survival of submersion for an emerging plant invader in the Colorado River system, USA. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4141&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
St. Andre, N., Roeder, B., and Belk, M. C. (2023). Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift. Hydrobiologia, 850(1), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hendrick, M., Zajchowski, C., Rose, J. et al. (2023). Do Rising Flows Lift All Boats? Ecosystem Services Elasticity in the Dolores River Watershed. Human Ecology 51(1):173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-022-00387-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. (2023). Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(2), 04022082. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5887 [see the [https://coloradoriverscience.org/Municipal_water_use#Data_and_tools Municipal water use] page for a link to the study data]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio-Velázquez, J., Loaiciga, H., and Lopez-Carr, D. (2023). Human-Induced Resource Scarcity in the Colorado River Basin and Its Implications for Water Supply and the Environment in the Mexicali Valley Transboundary Aquifer. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2162477&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2023). Institutional levels of water management in the Colorado River basin region: A macro-historical geographic review. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1024055.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1024055&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2022 ==&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Booker, J. F. (2022). Colorado River Water Use and Climate: Model and Application. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1752-1688.13035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13035.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feldman, D. R., Worden, M., Falco, N., et al. (2022). Three‐Dimensional Surface Downwelling Longwave Radiation Clear‐Sky Effects in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094605&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hoell, A., Quan, X.-W., Hoerling, M., et al. (2022). Record Low North American Monsoon Rainfall in 2020 Reignites Drought over the American Southwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0129.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pokharel, B., Jagannathan, K. A., Wang, S.-Y. (Simon), et al. [Preprint: Submitted in April 2022, not yet published]. Drought-busting “miracles” in the Colorado River Basin may become less frequent and less powerful under climate warming. Submitted to Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10511012.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D. G., Udall, B., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). An Assessment of Potential Severe Droughts in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13061&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Talsma, C. J., Bennett, K. E., and Vesselinov, V. V. (2022). Characterizing Drought Behavior in the Colorado River Basin Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Earth and Space Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002086&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., Woodson, D., Baker, S., et al. (2022). Incorporating Mid-Term Temperature Predictions into Streamflow Forecasts and Operational Reservoir Projections in the Colorado River Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148(4), 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001534&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wahl, E. R., Zorita, E., Diaz, H. F., and Hoell, A. (2022). Southwestern United States drought of the 21st century presages drier conditions into the future. Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment, 3(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00532-4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E. (2022). Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bedri, R., and Piechota, T. (2022). Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus. Hydrology, 9(12):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120227&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Biederman, J. A., Robles, M. D., Scott, R. L., and Knowles, J. F. (2022). Streamflow Response to Wildfire Differs with Season and Elevation in Adjacent Headwaters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030687&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kongoli, C., and Grassotti, C. (2022). Assimilation of blended in situ-satellite snow water equivalent into the National Water Model for improving hydrologic simulation in two US river basins. Science of The Total Environment, 838, 156567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156567&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gangopadhyay, S., Woodhouse, C. A., McCabe, G. J., Routson, C. C., and Meko, D. M. (2022). Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098781&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hull, R., Leonarduzzi, E., De La Fuente, L., Tran, H. V., Bennett, A., Melchior, P., Maxwell, R. M., and Condon, L. E. (2022). Using simulation-based inference to determine the parameters of an integrated hydrologic model: A case study from the upper Colorado River basin. Groundwater hydrology/Modelling approaches. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-345&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kampf, S. K., McGrath, D., Sears, M. G., et al. (2022). Increasing wildfire impacts on snowpack in the western U.S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(39), e2200333119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200333119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lin, Y., Takano, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2022). Investigation of Springtime Cloud Influence on Regional Climate and Its Implication in Runoff Decline in Upper Colorado River Basin. Earth and Space Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002059&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCoy, A. L., Jacobs, K. L., Vano, J. A., et al. (2022). The Press and Pulse of Climate Change: Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13021&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meko, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., and Winitsky, A. G. (2022). Tree‐Ring Perspectives on the Colorado River: Looking Back and Moving Forward. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12989&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Root, J. C., and Jones, D. (2022). Elevation-Area-Capacity Relationships of Lake Powell in 2018 and Estimated Loss of Storage Capacity Since 1963 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2022–5017; Scientific Investigations Report). https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225017&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management, Second Edition, 253-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Day, N. K., Miller, M. P., et al. (2022). A Review of Current Capabilities and Science Gaps in Water Supply Data, Modeling, and Trends for Water Availability Assessments in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water, 14(23), 3813. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233813&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., O’Neill, M. M., et al. (2022). A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01123-w&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, Z., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). Individualized and Combined Effects of Future Urban Growth and Climate Change on Irrigation Water Use in Central Arizona. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(3):370–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13005.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Livneh, B., McKinnon, K. A., et al. (2022). Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2114069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114069119&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, W., Hari, V., S-Y Wang, S., et al. (2022). Fewer Troughs, Not More Ridges, Have Led to a Drying Trend in the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1), e2021GL097089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., Rajagopalan, B., Prairie, J., Jerla, C., Zagona, E., Butler, R. A., amd Smith, R. (2022). The Colorado River Basin Operational Prediction Testbed: A Framework for Evaluating Streamflow Forecasts and Reservoir Operations. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13038&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bruckerhoff, L. A., Wheeler, K., Dibble, K. L., et al. (2022). Water Storage Decisions and Consumptive Use May Constrain Ecosystem Management under Severe Sustained Drought. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):654–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13020.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kuhn, E., and Fleck, J. (2022). “The Consequences of the Compact Remains with Us”: Challenges and Opportunities for the Colorado River Upper Basin. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094375&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt, J. C., Bruckerhoff, L., Salehabadi, H., and Wang, J. (2022). The Colorado River. In A. Gupta (Ed.), Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management (2nd ed., pp. 253–319). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119412632.ch10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Smith, R., Zagona, E., Kasprzyk, J., et al. (2022). Decision Science Can Help Address the Challenges of Long‐Term Planning in the Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12985&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, Mu, Mascaro G., Wang Z., Whitney, K. M., and Vivoni, E. R. (2022). On the Value of Satellite Remote Sensing to Reduce Uncertainties of Regional Simulations of the Colorado River. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 26(21), 5627–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5627-2022.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quay, R., Sternlieb, F., Rauh, E., et al. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: Perceptions and indicators. Water International, 47(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2041281&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stewart, C. J. (2022). Understanding Utah’s Transbasin Diversions. Colorado River Fundamentals (fact sheet), Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University, 9 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/news/Tranbasin-Fact-Sheet.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K. G., Udall, B., Wang, J., Kuhn, E., Salehabadi, H., &amp;amp; Schmidt, J. C. (2022). What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?. Science, 377(6604), 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S., Kim S., Green, C. H. M., and Jeong, J. (2022). Multivariate Polynomial Regression Modeling of Total Dissolved-Solids in Rangeland Stormwater Runoff in the Colorado River Basin. Environmental Modelling &amp;amp; Software 157:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105523.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reynolds, R. L., Goldstein, H. L., Kokaly, R. F., and Derry, J. (2022). Microplastic Particles in Dust-on-Snow, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013–16. Report. 2022–1061. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221061.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Johnson, C., Root, J. C., Hynek, S. A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2022). Sedimentary record of annual-decadal timescale reservoir dynamics: Anthropogenic stratigraphy of Lake Powell, Utah, U.S.A. The Sedimentary Record, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2022.1.3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
García‐Hernández, J., Leyva‐García, G., Aguilera‐Márquez, D., Díaz‐Argumedo, R. E., Santiago‐Serrano, E., and Zamora‐Arroyo, F. (2022). Select Water Quality Parameters during Wet and Dry Conditions in the Colorado River Delta. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.13047. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13047&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Comte, L., Olden, J. D., Lischka, S., and Dickson, B. G. (2022). Multi-scale threat assessment of riverine ecosystems in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108840&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Colby, B. G., and Hansen, H. (2022). Colorado Basin Incentive-Based Urban Water Policies: Review and Evaluation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(6):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13041.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Drugova, T., Kynda R. C., and Kim, M. (2022). The Impacts of Drought on Southwest Tribal Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13018.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Duval, D., Bickel, A. K., and Frisvold, G. B. (2022). Effects of Reservoir Levels on Arizona National Recreation Area Visitation, Visitor Spending, and Local Economies. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58(5):622–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12962.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., Son, K., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2022). Investigating uncertainties in human adaptation and their impacts on water scarcity in the Colorado river Basin, United States. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128015&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rushforth, R. R., Zegre, N. P., and Ruddell, B. L. (2022). The Three Colorado Rivers: Hydrologic, Infrastructural, and Economic Flows of Water in a Shared River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 58(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2021==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SECURE_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[2021 SECURE Water Act reports]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gangopadhyay, S., and McGuire, M. (2021). West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment. Technical Memorandum ENV-2021-001, Bureau of Reclamation. 423 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/westwidesecurereport1-2.pdf [v1.2 - June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021a). Water Reliability in the West—2021 SECURE Water Act Report. Bureau of Reclamation. 60 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/2021SECUREReport.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reclamation. (2021b). Colorado River Basin—SECURE Water Act Section 9503(c)—Report to Congress. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Interior. 34 pp. https://www.usbr.gov/climate/secure/docs/2021secure/basinreports/ColoradoBasin.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Eppehimer, D., Fard, E., Kemper, J., et al. (2021). Climate adaptation planning to support ecosystems and people in the Gila River Watershed, Arizona (p. 49). Southwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.swcasc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2022-03/NRWD_Final%20Report2021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett, K. E., Talsma, C., and Boero, R. (2021). Concurrent Changes in Extreme Hydroclimate Events in the Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070978&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brunner, M. I., Swain, D. L., Gilleland, E., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Increasing importance of temperature as a contributor to the spatial extent of streamflow drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Williams, A. P., et al. (2021). Uncertainties, Limits, and Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation for Soil Moisture Drought in Southwestern North America. Earth’s Future, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002014&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., et al. (2021). Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6 &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Bercos‐Hickey, E., et al. (2021). Sources of Subseasonal‐To‐Seasonal Predictability of Atmospheric Rivers and Precipitation in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034053&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mahoney, K., Scott, J. D., Alexander, M., et al. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cool season precipitation projections for California and the Western United States in NA-CORDEX models]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Climate Dynamics, 56(9–10), 3081–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05632-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Meyer, J. D. D., Wang, S. ‐Y. S., Gillies, R. R., and Yoon, J. (2021). Evaluating NA‐CORDEX historical performance and future change of western U.S. precipitation patterns and modes of variability. International Journal of Climatology, 41(9), 4509–4532. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7083&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mohsin, M., and Pilz, J. (2021). Stochastic model for drought analysis of the Colorado River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01989-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Osenga, E. C., Vano, J. A., and Arnott, J. C. (2021). A community‐supported weather and soil moisture monitoring database of the Roaring Fork catchment of the Colorado River Headwaters. Hydrological Processes, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14081&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Goodrich, J., Das, T., and Munévar, A. (2021). Evaluating Global Climate Models for Hydrological Studies of the Upper Colorado River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12974&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., Davenport, F. V., et al. (2021). Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: Do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future? Journal of Climate, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0055.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, A., Willett, R., Mamalakis, A., et al. (2021). Graph-Guided Regularized Regression of Pacific Ocean Climate Variables to Increase Predictive Skill of Southwestern U.S. Winter Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 34(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0079.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., et al. (2021). Stable isotopes of tree rings reveal seasonal-to-decadal patterns during the emergence of a megadrought in the Southwestern US. Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04916-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, E., and Yates, D. (2021). &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Incorporating multiyear temperature predictions for water resources planning]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0134.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2021). Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool‐Season Precipitation. Water Resources Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028599&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Xiao, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2021). Atmospheric Rivers and Snow Accumulation in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(16), e2021GL094265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094265&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A., Dannenberg, M. P., et al. (2021). Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092293&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Causal effect of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature on the Upper Colorado River Basin spring precipitation. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05944-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Rajagopalan, B., and Wood, A. W. (2021). Enhancing Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Upper Colorado River Basin Using Multi‐Model Climate Forecasts. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(6), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12960&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Brice, B., Guiterman, C. H., Woodhouse, C., et al. (2021). Comparing tree-ring based reconstructions of snowpack variability at different scales for the Navajo Nation. Climate Services, 22, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100213&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Darvishi, M., Destouni, G., Aminjafari, S., and Jaramillo, F. (2021). Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Elias, E., James, D., Heimel, S., et al. (2021). Implications of observed changes in high mountain snow water storage, snowmelt timing and melt window. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100799&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C. (2021). Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleming, S. W., Vesselinov, V. V., and Goodbody, A. G. (2021). Augmenting geophysical interpretation of data-driven operational water supply forecast modeling for a western US river using a hybrid machine learning approach. Journal of Hydrology, 597, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126327&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heldmyer, A., Livneh, B., Molotch, N., and Rajagopalan, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Peak Snow‐Water Equivalent and Snow Timing Indices in the Western United States and Alaska. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029395&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hwang, J., Kumar, H., Ruhi, A., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Devineni, N. (2021). Quantifying Dam-Induced Fluctuations in Streamflow Frequencies Across the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 57(10), e2021WR029753. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029753&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lackner, C. P., Geerts, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Impact of global warming on snow in ski areas: A case study using a regional climate simulation over the interior western United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Li, Y., Gao, H., Allen, G. H., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Constructing Reservoir Area–Volume–Elevation Curve from TanDEM-X DEM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051103&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mankin, J. S., Simpson, I., Hoell, A., et al. (2021). NOAA Drought Task Force Report on the 2020-2021 Southwestern U.S. Drought. NOAA Drought Task Force, MAPP, and NIDIS. 20 pp. https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/NOAA-Drought-Task-Force-IV-Southwest-Drought-Report-9-23-21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2021). Water balance of the turn-of-the-century drought in the Southwestern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McKinnon, K. A., Poppick, A., and Simpson, I. R. (2021). Hot extremes have become drier in the United States Southwest. Nature Climate Change, 11(7), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01076-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Miller, M. P., Longley, P. C., et al. (2021). How Will Baseflow Respond to Climate Change in the Upper Colorado River Basin? Geophysical Research Letters, 48(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095085&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Miller, O. L., Putman, A. L., Alder, J., et al. (2021). Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology X, 11, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100074&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P. (2021). Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rose, K. C., Kiang, J. E., et al. (2021). Indicators of climate change impacts on the water cycle and water management. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03057-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sabol, T. A., Griffiths, R. E., Topping, D. J., et al. (2021). Strandlines from large floods on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Report No. 2021–5048; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215048&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scanlon, B. R., Rateb, A., Pool, D. R., et al. (2021). Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Schrock, I. J. Y., Fassnacht, S. R., Collados-Lara, A.-J., et al. (2021). Snow Water Equivalent Accumulation Patterns from a Trajectory Approach over the U.S. Southern Rocky Mountains. Hydrology, 8(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030124&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., et al. (2021). A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(11), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swanson, R. K., Springer, A. E., Kreamer, D. K., et al. (2021). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: Its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal, 29(2), 723–736. ($) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02260-5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Unema, J. A., Topping, D. J., Kohl, K. A., Pillow, M. J., and Caster, J. J. (2021). Historical floods and geomorphic change in the lower Little Colorado River during the late 19th to early 21st centuries (Report No. 2021–5049; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 34). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215049&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C. A., Smith, R. M., McAfee, S. A., et al. (2021). Upper Colorado River Basin 20th century droughts under 21st century warming: Plausible scenarios for the future. Climate Services, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100206&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodson, D., Rajagopalan, B., Baker, S., et al. (2021). Stochastic Decadal Projections of Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Pool Elevations Conditioned on Temperature Projections. Water Resources Research, 57(12), e2021WR030936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030936&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yin, G., Forman, B. A., and Wang, J. (2021). Assimilation of Ground-Based GPS Observations of Vertical Displacement into a Land Surface Model to Improve Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates. Water Resources Research, 57(2), e2020WR028763.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028763&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao, S., Fu, R., Zhuang, Y., and Wang, G. (2021). Long-Lead Seasonal Prediction of Streamflow over the Upper Colorado River Basin: The Role of the Pacific Sea Surface Temperature and Beyond. Journal of Climate, 34(16), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0824.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butler, A., Fulp, T., Prairie, J., and Witherall, A. (2021). Water Resources Management in the Colorado River Basin. In Handbook of Catchment Management 2e (pp. 441–463). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch18&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Castle, A. (2021). Green Light for Adaptive Policies on the Colorado River. Water, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010002&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Fleck, J., and Udall, B. (2021). Managing Colorado River risk. Science, 372(6545), 885–885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5498&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., and Islam, S. (2021). Water stress and water salience: Implications for water supply planning. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(6), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1903474&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Jacobs, K. L., McCoy, A. L., et al. (2021). Scenario Planning: Embracing the Potential for Extreme Events in the Colorado River Basin. Climatic Change, 165(1–2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03013-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gerlak, A. K., Karambelkar, S., and Ferguson, D. B. (2021). Knowledge governance and learning: Examining challenges and opportunities in the Colorado River basin. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.026&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gilson, G., and Garrick, D. (2021). Can Philanthropy Enable Collective Action to Conserve Rivers? Insights from a Decade of Collaboration in the Colorado River Basin. Conservation and Society, 19(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_225_20&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hung, F., and Yang, Y. C. E. (2021). Assessing Adaptive Irrigation Impacts on Water Scarcity in Nonstationary Environments—A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Water Resources Research, 57(9), e2020WR029262. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029262&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kwon, K., and Gimbel, J. (2021). Quenching Thirst in the Colorado River Basin. Colorado Water Center, Colorado State University, July 2021. 68 p. https://watercenter.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2021/11/CoWC-CR-Papers-Final-11032021.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). Colorado River Basin. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780342&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. J. (2021). The Law of the Colorado River: Coping with Severe Sustained Drought, Part II. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811024&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
MacDonnell, L. (2021). Sources of Controversy in the Law of the Colorado River: An Upper Basin View. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3874212&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milman, A., Bonnell, C., Maguire, R., Sorensen, K., and Blomquist, W. (2021). Groundwater Recharge for Water Security. Case Studies in the Environment, 5(1), 1113999. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1113999&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., and Gerlak, A. K. (2021). Evolving together: Transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09538-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rivera-Torres, M., Gerlak, A. K., and Jacobs, K. L. (2021). Lesson learning in the Colorado River Basin. Water International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1913782&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Adapt Lake Mead Releases to Inflow to Give Managers More Flexibility to Slow Reservoir Draw Down. Paper 170, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, September 2021. 10 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/170/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Spivak, D. S. (2021). The Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan. Natural Resources Journal, 61, 33. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol61/iss2/4/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Rosenberg, D. E. (2021). Living Within Our Means: Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water. Paper 171, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, 2021. 25 p. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_pubs/171/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wheeler, K., Kuhn, E., Bruckerhoff, L., et al. (2021). Alternative Management Paradigms for the Future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. White Paper 6, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 91 pp. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper6.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cabot, P., Derwingson, A., and Torres-Rua, A. (2021). Evaluating Conserved-Consumptive Use in the Upper Colorado Basin. Colorado Water Conservation Board, November 2021. https://www.waterinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Evaluating-Conserved-Consumptive-Use-in-the-Upper-Colorado-Basin_2020-Project-Report-00484067xC13E4.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Earp, K. J., and Moreo, M. T. (2021). Evaporation from Lake Mead and Lake Mohave, Nevada and Arizona, 2010–2019 (Open-File Report No. 2021–1022; 48 p.). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211022&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Melton, F. S., Huntington, J., Grimm, R., et al. (2021). OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1752-1688.12956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12956&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Norton, C. L., Dannenberg, M. P., Yan, D., et al. (2021). Climate and Socioeconomic Factors Drive Irrigated Agriculture Dynamics in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091659&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cavallin, J. E., Battaglin, W. A., Beihoffer, J., et al.  (2021). Effects-Based Monitoring of Bioactive Chemicals Discharged to the Colorado River before and after a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05269&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Cederberg, J. R., Paretti, N. V., Coes, A. L., Hermosillo, E., and Andrade, L. (2021). Estimation of dissolved-solids concentrations using continuous water-quality monitoring and regression models at four sites in the Yuma area, Arizona and California, January 2017 through March 2019 (Report No. 2021–5080; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 26). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215080&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K. (2021). Assessment of streamflow and water quality in the Upper Yampa River Basin, Colorado, 1992–2018 (Report No. 2021–5016; Scientific Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hannoun, D., Tietjen, T., &amp;amp; Brooks, K. (2021). The potential effects of climate change and drawdown on a newly constructed drinking water intake: Study case in Las Vegas, NV, USA. Water Utility Journal, 27, 1–13. http://www.ewra.net/wuj/pdf/WUJ_2021_27_01.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mueller, E. R., and Grams, P. E. (2021). A Morphodynamic Model to Evaluate Long‐Term Sandbar Rebuilding Using Controlled Floods in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093007&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rumsey, C. A., Miller, O., Hirsch, R. M., et al. (2021). Substantial Declines in Salinity Observed Across the Upper Colorado River Basin During the 20th Century, 1929–2019. Water Resources Research, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Abernethy, E. F., Muehlbauer, J. D., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Hydropeaking intensity and dam proximity limit aquatic invertebrate diversity in the Colorado River Basin. Ecosphere, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3559&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Alizadeh, M. R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., et al. (2021). Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2009717118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009717118&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Bransky, N., Sankey, T., B. Sankey, J., et al. (2021). Monitoring Tamarix Changes Using WorldView-2 Satellite Imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050958&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
DeLuca, W. V., Meehan, T., Seavy, et al. (2021). The Colorado River Delta and California’s Central Valley are critical regions for many migrating North American landbirds. Ornithological Applications, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa064&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dibble, K. L., Yackulic, C. B., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2021). Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecological Applications, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2279&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Durning, L. E., Sankey, J. B., Yackulic, C. B., et al. (2021). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects on riparian plant species occurrence and encroachment: Remote sensing of 360 km of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ecohydrology, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2344&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Heidari, H., Warziniack, T., Brown, T. C., and Arabi, M. (2021). Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Forests, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020139&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hooley‐Underwood, Z. E., Thompson, K. G., and Bestgen, K. R. (2021). Razorback Sucker Spawning in an Intermittent Colorado Tributary. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10623&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kasprak, A., Sankey, J. B., and Butterfield, B. J. (2021). Future regulated flows of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon foretell decreased areal extent of sediment and increases in riparian vegetation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e4&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Koehn, C. R., Petrie, M. D., Bradford, J. B., et al. (2021). Seasonal Precipitation and Soil Moisture Relationships Across Forests and Woodlands in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005986&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lomeli-Banda, M. A., Ramírez-Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., and Salazar-Briones, C. (2021). The role of hydrological processes in ecosystem conservation: Comprehensive water management for a wetland in an arid climate. Hydrological Processes, 35(2), e14013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto-Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2021). Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Palmquist, E. C., Allan, G. J., Ogle, K., et al. (2021). Riverine complexity and life history inform restoration in riparian environments in the southwestern U.S. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., Ahrens, Z. T., McKinstry, M. C., Budy, P., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Trophic niches of native and nonnative fishes along a river-reservoir continuum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91730-1&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., and Gido, K. B. (2021). Spatial and temporal dynamics of fish assemblages in a desert reservoir over 38 years. Hydrobiologia, 848(6), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04514-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tonkin, J. D., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M., et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(6), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2348&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Waldo, S., Deemer, B. R., Bair, L. S., and Beaulieu, J. J. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from an arid-zone reservoir and their environmental policy significance: Results from existing global models and an exploratory dataset. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.006&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zamora, H. A., Eastoe, C. J., McIntosh, J. C., and Flessa, K. W. (2021). Groundwater Origin and Dynamics on the Eastern Flank of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Hydrology, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020080&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tanana, H., Garcia, J., Olaya, A., et al. (2021). Universal Access to Clean Water for Tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Water and Tribes Initiative, Colorado River Basin. http://www.naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-tribes/wti-full-report-4.21.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-cutting reports===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SoS_cover_thumb.png|thumb|150px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (p. 531). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder. https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477&lt;br /&gt;
*Individual report chapters (2-11) are separately listed in their respective categories below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weather and climate=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., et al. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(1), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Ault, T. R. (2020). On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science, 368(6488), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5492&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B. (2020). Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(5), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Chikamoto, Y., Wang, S.-Y. S., Yost, M., Yocom, L., and Gillies, R. R. (2020). Colorado River water supply is predictable on multi-year timescales owing to long-term ocean memory. Nature Communications Earth and Environment, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00027-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Foster, L. M., Williams, K. H., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., et al. (2020). Ridging Associated with Drought across the Western and Southwestern United States: Characteristics, Trends, and Predictability Sources. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hausfather, Z., and Peters, G. P. (2020). Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature, 577(7792), 618–620. ($) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., and Zhang, X. (2020). Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(24), 13308–13313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921628117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Squires, M. F., et al. (2020). Precipitation Extremes: Trends and Relationships with Average Precipitation and Precipitable Water in the Contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Wolter, K., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Weather and Climate Forecasting (Chapter 7). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 254–286). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., et al.  (2020). Windows of Opportunity for Skillful Forecasts Subseasonal to Seasonal and Beyond. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS-D-18-0326.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McAfee, S. (2020). Observations—Weather and Climate (Chapter 4). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 114–152). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Patricola, C. M., O’Brien, J. P., Risser, M. D., et al. (2020). Maximizing ENSO as a source of western US hydroclimate predictability. Climate Dynamics, 54(1–2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05004-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sierks, M. D., Kalansky, J., Cannon, F., and Ralph, F. M. (2020). Characteristics, Origins, and Impacts of Summertime Extreme Precipitation in the Lake Mead Watershed. Journal of Climate, 33(7), 2663–2680. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0387.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Burnette, D. J., et al. (2020). Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America. Journal of Climate, 33(8), 3173–3195. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0270.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Thakur, B., Kalra, A., Lakshmi, V., et al. (2020). Linkage between ENSO phases and western US snow water equivalent. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104827&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., et al. (2020). Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Science Advances, 6(12), eaaz9549. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., et al. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020a). Hydrologic Models (Chapter 6). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 221–252). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wood, A., Woelders, L., and Lukas, J. (2020b). Streamflow Forecasting (Chapter 8). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 287–333). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Woodhouse, C., and Lukas, J. J. (2020). Paleohydrology (Chapter 10). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 361–383). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hydrology and water availability===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Broxton, P. D., Van Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A. (2020). Forest cover and topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest United States. Ecohydrology, 13(4), e2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carroll, R. W. H., Gochis, D., and Williams, K. H. (2020). Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090856&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Condon, L. E., Atchley, A. L., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Davenport, F. V., Herrera‐Estrada, J. E., Burke, M., and Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020). Flood Size Increases Nonlinearly Across the Western United States in Response to Lower Snow‐Precipitation Ratios. Water Resources Research, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025571&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L., Renshaw, C. E., and Magilligan, F. J. (2020). Spatially coherent regional changes in seasonal extreme streamflow events in the United States and Canada since 1950. Science Advances, 6(49), eaba5939. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba5939&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hammond, J. C., and Kampf, S. K. (2020). Subannual Streamflow Responses to Rainfall and Snowmelt Inputs in Snow‐Dominated Watersheds of the Western United States. Water Resources Research, 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026132&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kohn, M. S., Marineu, M. D., Hempel, L. A., and McDonald, R. R. (2020). Incipient Bed-Movement and Flood-Frequency Analysis using Hydrophones to Estimate Flushing Flows on the Upper Colorado River, Colorado, 2019 (Scientific Investigations Report No. 2020–5069; Scientific Investigations Report, p. 50). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Greenbaum, N., Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Paleoflood hydrology on the lower Green River, upper Colorado River Basin, USA: An example of a naturalist approach to flood-risk analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 580, 124337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124337 [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Liu, T., Ji, L., Baker, V. R., Harden, T. M., and Cline, M. L. (2020). Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 44(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320904038  &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Livneh, B., and Badger, A. M. (2020). Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lopez‐Cantu, T., Prein, A. F., and Samaras, C. (2020). Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086797&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Gutmann, E., Harding, B., and Lehner, F. (2020). Climate Change-Informed Hydrology (Chapter 11). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 384–449). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., and Harding, B. (2020). Current Understanding of Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology (Chapter 2). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 42–81). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Lukas, J., Payton, E., Deems, J., Rangwala, I., and Duncan, B. (2020). Observations—Hydrology (Chapter 5). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 154–219). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Martin, J. T., Pederson, G. T., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11328–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916208117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2020). The Water‐Year Water Balance of the Colorado River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12848&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
McCabe, G. J., Wolock, D. M., Woodhouse, C. A., et al. (2020). Basinwide Hydroclimatic Drought in the Colorado River Basin. Earth Interactions, 24(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-20-0001.1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Milly, P. C. D., and Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, S. M., Kendy, E., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Channel incision by headcut migration: Reconnection of the Colorado River to its estuary and the Gulf of California during the floods of 1979–1988. Hydrological Processes, 34(22), 4156–4174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
O’Leary, D. S., Hall, D. K., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Riggs, G. A. (2020). Regional trends in snowmelt timing for the western United States throughout the MODIS era. Physical Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2020.1854418&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Overpeck, J. T., and Udall, B. (2020). Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22), 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E. (2020). Historical Hydrology (Chapter 9). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 337–360). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Penn, C. A., Clow, D. W., Sexstone, G. A., and Murphy, S. F. (2020). Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 882–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12863&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R., Pool, D. R., et al. (2020). Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE Satellites With Monitoring and Modeling of Major U.S. Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Exploring Climate and Hydrology Projections from the CMIP5 Archive. (Draft report.) US Bureau of Reclamation. [unreleased as of June 2021]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robeson, S. M., Maxwell, J. T., and Ficklin, D. L. (2020). Bias Correction of Paleoclimatic Reconstructions: A New Look at 1,200+ Years of Upper Colorado River Flow. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Robles, M. D., Hammond, J. C., Kampf, S. K., Biederman, J. A., and Demaria, E. M. C. (2020). Winter Inputs Buffer Streamflow Sensitivity to Snowpack Losses in the Salt River Watershed in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Water, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010003&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Salehabadi, H., Tarboton, D., Kuhn, E., et al. (2020). The future hydrology of the Colorado River Basin. Future of the Colorado River Project, White Paper No. 4. Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. 71 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2020/rmrs_2020_salehabadi_h001.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Solder, J. E., Beisner, K. R., Anderson, J., and Bills, D. J. (2020). Rethinking groundwater flow on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, USA: Characterizing recharge sources and flow paths with environmental tracers. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02193-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., et al. (2020). Increased Flood Exposure Due to Climate Change and Population Growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001778&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tillman, F. D., Gangopadhyay, S., and Pruitt, T. (2020b). Recent and projected precipitation and temperature changes in the Grand Canyon area with implications for groundwater resources. Nature Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76743-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Tran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M. (2020). Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13000&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau. White Paper 5, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/WhitePaper5.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., et al. (2020). Within‐Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas. Water Resources Research, 56(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water management, planning, and policy===&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., et al.  (2020). Water Accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3), 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Garcia, M., Ridolfi, E., and Di Baldassarre, G. (2020). The interplay between reservoir storage and operating rules under evolving conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125270&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hadjimichael, A., Quinn, J., Wilson, et al. (2020). Defining Robustness, Vulnerabilities, and Consequential Scenarios for Diverse Stakeholder Interests in Institutionally Complex River Basins. Earth’s Future, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbins, M., and Barsugli, J. (2020). Threatening the vigor of the Colorado River. Science, 367(6483), 1192–1193. ($) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3624&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Juricich, R. (2020). Colorado River Basin Governance, Decision Making, and Alternative Approaches. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482957.013&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Karambelkar, S., and Gerlak, A. K. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Colorado River Basin: An Examination of Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Natural Resources Journal, 60(1), 47. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss1/3/&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Khatri, K. B., and Strong, C. (2020). Climate Change, Water Resources, and Potential Adaptation Strategies in Utah. Utah Division of Water Resources. https://water.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Final-Report_ClimateChangeUtah_May_2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mumme, S. P. (2020). The 1944 Water Treaty and the Incorporation of Environmental Values in U.S.-Mexico Transboundary Water Governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 126–133. ($) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.001&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., and Marshall Shepherd, J. (2020). From hubris to humility: Transcending original sin in managing hydroclimatic risk. Anthropocene, 30, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100239&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Banner, J. L., Cook, B. I., et al. (2020). Unprecedented Drought Challenges for Texas Water Resources in a Changing Climate: What Do Researchers and Stakeholders Need to Know? Earth’s Future, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001552&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Page, R., and Dilling, L. (2020). How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers. Climatic Change, 161(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02712-7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, E., Smith, R., Jerla, C., and Prairie, J. (2020). Primary Planning Tools (Chapter 3). In Colorado River Basin Climate and Hydrology: State of the Science (pp. 82–111). Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/reports/8w32r663z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Reclamation. (2020). Draft 7D Report—Review of the Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Upper and Lower Colorado Basin Regions. US Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/documents/7.D.Review_DraftReport_10-23-2020.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Andrews, S., Dahlinghaus, R., et al. (2020). Buy Me a River: Purchasing Water Rights to Restore River Flows in the Western USA. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12808&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rightnar, J., and Dinar, A. (2020). The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region. Water Resources Management, 34(8), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Sterle, K., Jose, L., Coors, S., et al. (2020). Collaboratively Modeling Reservoir Reoperation to Adapt to Earlier Snowmelt Runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(1), 05019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001136&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, J., Rosenberg, D. E., Wheeler, K. G., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Managing the Colorado River for an Uncertain Future. White Paper 3, Future of the Colorado River Project, Center for Colorado River Studies, Utah State University. https://qcnr.usu.edu/coloradoriver/files/CCRS_White_Paper_3.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yang, Y. C. E., Son, K., Hung, F., and Tidwell, V. (2020). Impact of climate change on adaptive management decisions in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125015  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water use=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Joshi, N., Tamaddun, K., Parajuli, R., et al. (2020). Future Changes in Water Supply and Demand for Las Vegas Valley: A System Dynamic Approach based on CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections. Hydrology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010016&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., et al.  (2020). Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity. Water, 12(10), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Richter, B. D., Bartak, D., Caldwell, P., et al. (2020). Water scarcity and fish imperilment driven by beef production. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-z&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang, B., Xia, Y., Long, B., et al. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810  [select &amp;quot;View Open Manuscript&amp;quot; if no institutional access]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water quality and sediment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Carbajal, N., Ley, Y. M.-, Soto-Jiménez, M., Páez-Osuna, F., and Tuxpan, J. (2020). Finger-like plumes of suspended sediment in the Colorado River Delta, Gulf of California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106996&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Dean, D. J., Topping, D. J., Grams, P. E., Walker, A. E., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Does Channel Narrowing by Floodplain Growth Necessarily Indicate Sediment Surplus? Lessons From Sediment Transport Analyses in the Green and Colorado Rivers, Canyonlands, Utah. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005414&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Deemer, B. R., Stets, E. G., and Yackulic, C. B. (2020). Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
East, A. E., and Sankey, J. B. (2020). Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., Walker, A. E., Kasprak, A., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). The roles of flood magnitude and duration in controlling channel width and complexity on the Green River in Canyonlands, Utah, USA. Geomorphology, 371, 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107438&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Hensley, R. T., Spangler, M. J., DeVito, L. F., et al. (2020). Evaluating spatiotemporal variation in water chemistry of the upper Colorado River using longitudinal profiling. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13690&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mihalevich, B. A., Neilson, B. T., Buahin, C. A., Yackulic, C. B., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Water Temperature Controls for Regulated Canyon‐Bound Rivers. Water Resources Research, 56(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027566&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Rubin, D. M., Buscombe, D., Wright, S. A., et al. (2020). Causes of Variability in Suspended‐Sand Concentration Evaluated Using Measurements in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005226&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Saber, A., James, D. E., and Hayes, D. F. (2020). Long‐term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(6), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11390&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walker, A. E., Moore, J. N., Grams, P. E., Dean, D. J., and Schmidt, J. C. (2020). Channel narrowing by inset floodplain formation of the lower Green River in the Canyonlands region, Utah. GSA Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B35233.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecosystems and environment=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Arcusa, S. H., McKay, N. P., Routson, C. C., and Munoz, S. E. (2020). Dust-drought interactions over the last 15,000 years: A network of lake sediment records from the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. The Holocene, 30(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619875192&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Baldwin, A. K., Spanjer, A. R., Rosen, M. R., and Thom, T. (2020). Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0228896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228896&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Butterfield, B. J., Grams, P. E., Durning, L. E., et al. (2020). Associations between riparian plant morphological guilds and fluvial sediment dynamics along the regulated Colorado River in Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3589&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Day, N. K., Schmidt, T. S., Roberts, J. J., et al. (2020). Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226824&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Diehl, R. M., Wilcox, A. C., and Stella, J. C. (2020). Evaluation of the integrated riparian ecosystem response to future flow regimes on semiarid rivers in Colorado, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111037&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Goeking, S. A., and Tarboton, D. G. (2020). Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous Forests. Journal of Forestry, 118(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Gómez‐Sapiens, M. M., Jarchow, C. J., Flessa, K. W., et al. (2020). Effect of an environmental flow on vegetation growth and health using ground and remote sensing metrics. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13689&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Healy, B. D., Omana Smith, E. C., Schelly, R. C., Trammell, M. A., and Nelson, C. B. (2020). Establishment of a Reproducing Population of Endangered Humpback Chub through Translocations to a Colorado River Tributary in Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 40(1), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10408&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Kegerries, R. B., Albrecht, B., McKinstry, M. C., et al. (2020). Small-Bodied Fish Surveys Demonstrate Native Fish Dominance Over 300 Kilometers of the Colorado River Through Grand Canyon, Arizona. Western North American Naturalist, 80(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.080.0202&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Mayes, M., Caylor, K. K., Singer, M. B., et al. (2020). Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4884–4903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13942&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Nagler, P. L., Barreto‐Muñoz, A., Chavoshi Borujeni, S., et al. (2020). Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta. Hydrological Processes, 34(25), 4851–4883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13911&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Pennock, C. A., McKinstry, M. C., Cathcart, C. N., et al. (2020). Movement ecology of imperilled fish in a novel ecosystem: River‐reservoir movements by razorback sucker and translocations to aid conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 30(8), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3399&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Scamardo, J., and Wohl, E. (2020). Sediment storage and shallow groundwater response to beaver dam analogues in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications, 36(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3592&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, L. E., Jenness, J., and Ledbetter, J. D. (2020). Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts. Water, 12(5), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051501&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Szejner, P., Belmecheri, S., Ehleringer, J. R., and Monson, R. K. (2020). Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests. Oecologia, 192(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04550-6&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Walters, D. M., Cross, W. F., Kennedy, T. A., et al. (2020). Food web controls on mercury fluxes and fate in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Science Advances, 6(20), eaaz4880. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4880&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Societal and economic issues=== &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Wutich, A., DeMyers, C., Bausch, J. C., White, D. D., and Sullivan, A. (2020). Stakeholders and social influence in a shadow network: Implications for transitions toward urban water sustainability in the Colorado River basin. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11451-250128&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3921</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3921"/>
		<updated>2024-03-05T19:56:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:HumpbackChub_usgs.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. Humpback Chub. (Photographer: George Andrejko&lt;br /&gt;
Arizona Game and Fish Department, accessed via U.S. Geological Survey)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Currently, only the small population in Lake Mead is self-sustaining. The populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained through hatchery augmentation; hatchery-spawned fish are usually stocked once they reach sub-adult size (~300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a larger size to resist predation, and stocked back into Lake Mohave. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3920</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3920"/>
		<updated>2024-03-05T19:56:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:HumpbackChub_usgs.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Humpback Chub. (Photographer: George Andrejko&lt;br /&gt;
Arizona Game and Fish Department, accessed via U.S. Geological Survey)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Currently, only the small population in Lake Mead is self-sustaining. The populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained through hatchery augmentation; hatchery-spawned fish are usually stocked once they reach sub-adult size (~300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a larger size to resist predation, and stocked back into Lake Mohave. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:HumpbackChub_usgs.jpeg&amp;diff=3919</id>
		<title>File:HumpbackChub usgs.jpeg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=File:HumpbackChub_usgs.jpeg&amp;diff=3919"/>
		<updated>2024-03-05T19:56:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3918</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3918"/>
		<updated>2024-03-05T19:56:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Humpback Chub. (Photographer: George Andrejko&lt;br /&gt;
Arizona Game and Fish Department, accessed via U.S. Geological Survey)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Currently, only the small population in Lake Mead is self-sustaining. The populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained through hatchery augmentation; hatchery-spawned fish are usually stocked once they reach sub-adult size (~300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a larger size to resist predation, and stocked back into Lake Mohave. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3917</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3917"/>
		<updated>2024-03-05T19:54:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Humpback Chub (B) Razorback Sucker. (Photos by XXXXXXXXXXXX.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Currently, only the small population in Lake Mead is self-sustaining. The populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained through hatchery augmentation; hatchery-spawned fish are usually stocked once they reach sub-adult size (~300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a larger size to resist predation, and stocked back into Lake Mohave. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3893</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3893"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:18:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Humpback Chub (B) Razorback Sucker. (Photos by XXXXXXXXXXXX.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3892</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3892"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]===&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3891</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3891"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:11:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3890</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3890"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:11:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3889</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3889"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:11:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.lcrmscp.gov/publications Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program - Publications Database]&lt;br /&gt;
The LCR MSCP publications database can be sorted by species, location, publication type, etc., including over 100 technical reports related to Bonytail, Humpback Chub, Razorback Sucker, and Flannelmouth Sucker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Main_Page Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) Wiki - Fish Pages]&lt;br /&gt;
Managed by Reclamation, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) supports the cooperative integration of dam operations, downstream resource protection,  management, and research–including with regard to the four endangered fish in the Grand Canyon. The GCDAMP Wiki has many pages with useful information and links to technical resources, including these pages on the endangered fish species:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_Bonytail_Fish Bonytail Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Humpback_Chub_Page Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/GCDAMP_RAZU_Fish Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/Colorado_Pikeminnow Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gcdamp.com/index.php/FISH &#039;&#039;&#039;Main Fish Page&#039;&#039;&#039;]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3888</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3888"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:08:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&#039;&#039;Ptychocheilus Iucius&#039;&#039;), Razorback sucker (&#039;&#039;Xyrauchen texanus&#039;&#039;), Bonytail (&#039;&#039;Gila elegans&#039;&#039;), and Humpback Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila cypha&#039;&#039;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (&#039;&#039;Plagopterus argentissimus&#039;&#039;) and Virgin River Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila seminuda&#039;&#039;) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus latipinnis&#039;&#039;), Bluehead Sucker (&#039;&#039;Catostomus discobolus&#039;&#039;), and Roundtail Chub (&#039;&#039;Gila robusta&#039;&#039;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3887</id>
		<title>Threatened and endangered fish species</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://coloradoriverscience.org/index.php?title=Threatened_and_endangered_fish_species&amp;diff=3887"/>
		<updated>2024-02-21T16:07:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TanyaPetach: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TamariskImage.jpeg|thumb|700px|Figure 1. (A) Tamarisk-dominated habitat in which the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bred at St. George, Utah, prior to tamarisk defoliation. (B) The same habitat during defoliation in 2008. An active flycatcher nest eventually failed in this habitat. (Photos by P. Wheeler, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Modified from figure compilation by Paxton et al., 2011.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado River Basin is home to at least 35 native fish species. At least 26 of these species are endemic to the basin, occurring nowhere else, including four key federally-listed threatened or endangered species: Colorado Pikeminnow (&amp;quot;Ptychocheilus Iucius&amp;quot;), Razorback sucker (&amp;quot;Xyrauchen texanus&amp;quot;), Bonytail (&amp;quot;Gila elegans&amp;quot;), and Humpback Chub (&amp;quot;Gila cypha&amp;quot;). The range and populations of all four species have declined dramatically since the early 1900s due to the combined impacts of dam construction and resulting changes in flow regimes, water temperatures, and water quality; channelization and backwater habitat loss; water diversions and depletions; and the introduction and expansion of predatory non-native coldwater species, and overfishing. The viability and status of these four species of fish–all finely adapted to pre-development river conditions–serves as a general indicator of the ecosystem health of the river system. In addition to the four major federally-listed species, the Woundfin (Plagopterus argentissimus) and Virgin River Chub (Gila seminuda) are also federally listed threatened or endangered species and are found in the Virgin River tributary to the Colorado. &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), federal agencies must avoid actions that are likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species, and must develop programs to conserve critical habitat and recover the species, in partnership with states and other stakeholders. The need to meet these directives has resulted in changes to the operation of the basin’s dams and to water diversions, principally to meet species’ instream flow requirements. In 1988, the need to better coordinate research, monitoring, adaptive management, and recovery of the four species within the Upper Basin led to the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCR FRP), which in 1992 was supplemented by a recovery implementation program specific to the San Juan River, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRB RIP).  The SJRB RIP focuses specifically on the recovery of the Razorback Sucker and the Colorado Pikeminnow. In 2005, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) was initiated to coordinate monitoring and recovery for the endangered fish, and ESA-listed bird species, in the Lower Basin. A Virgin River specific recovery program, the Virgin River Program (VRP), coordinates recovery and conservation efforts of native species in the Virgin River tributary. &lt;br /&gt;
Three additional native fish species, sometimes collectively called the “three-species assemblage” since they often co-occur, are not listed under ESA but have declining populations: Flannelmouth Sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado Pikeminnow=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado Pikeminnow is the largest minnow in North America, historically growing up to 6 feet in length and living for up to 40 years. Large adults found today are more typically 2-3 feet in length,The Colorado Pikeminnow has a long, torpedo-shaped, green and gold body and is a top predator despite its lack of jaw teeth.  &lt;br /&gt;
The historic range of the Colorado Pikeminnow extended throughout the accessible warmwater reaches of the basin, which included the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* The mainstem from western Colorado down to the delta in Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
* The major Upper Basin tributaries (Green, Yampa, White, Gunnison, Dolores, San Juan, Uncompahgre, Animas)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Gila River and its tributaries&lt;br /&gt;
Colorado Pikeminnow are currently found only in the Upper Basin, in portions of the mainstem, and the Green, White, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan rivers. The Colorado Pikeminnow was listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service in 1967, prior to the enactment of ESA in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Razorback Sucker===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Razorback Sucker can be identified by the sharp-edged hump, or razorback, behind its head. The only member of its genus, the Razorback Sucker can grow to 3 feet in length and live for 40 years. The historic range of the Razorback Sucker extended throughout  warmwater reaches of the basin, typically in calmer water. The Razorback Sucker was listed as an endangered species in 1991. Populations in the upper mainstem, Green, Yampa, Gunnison, and San Juan are maintained by hatchery augmentation. These are hatchery spawned fish that are stocked into these systems (usually once they reach sub-adult sizes ~ 300 mm). The Lake Mohave population consists of fish that were spawned in the wild, brought into captivity, reared to a size where they&#039;re large enough to avoid most predation, and stocked back to Lake Mohave. There is very limited wild recruitment outside of the Lake Mead population, which is small but self-sustaining. The Razorback Sucker was proposed for downlisting in 2021, but as of early 2024 its status remains “endangered”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bonytail===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytails are the rarest of the four threatened and endangered fish species in the basin. It has large fins, a streamlined body that is pencil-thin near its tail, and gray or olive-colored back, silver sides, and a white belly. Bonytail can grow to about 2 feet in length and can live up to 50 years. 	&lt;br /&gt;
Bonytail habitat historically extended throughout much of the warmwater reaches of the basin. Currently, the few populations of bonytail–in limited reaches of the upper mainstem in western Colorado, the Green and Yampa, and in Lake Mohave–-are maintained only by ongoing stocking programs. Survival rates of stocked young bonytail are extremely low, and self-sustaining populations have not been established. The Bonytail was listed as endangered in 1980. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humpback Chub===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Humpback Chub, named for the prominent hump behind its head, is a minnow endemic to the warmwater reaches of the Colorado River Basin. Humpback Chub are able to navigate swift waters despite being relatively small (~20 inches maximum length size) by using its hump as a hydrodynamic foil. The historical range of the Humpback Chub was probably limited to the eddies below rapids in several canyon reaches of the mainstem, including the Grand Canyon, as well as in canyons in the Green, Yampa, and Little Colorado rivers. At the time of its listing as endangered in 1967, two of eight historical populations of Humpback Chub had been extirpated due directly to dams, and a third population is believed to have been extirpated by 2004. However, the Humpback Chub’s largest population, in the Grand Canyon, has expanded in numbers and range in recent years, leading to the downlisting of the species from Endangered to Threatened in 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Three additional species of concern ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are all warmwater fish historically distributed widely across the basin, including smaller tributaries and streams. The ranges and populations of all three species are declining; estimates suggest that each species occupies about half of its historic range in the Colorado River Basin. None of these species are federally listed as threatened or endangered.  The Lower Basin population of Roundtail Chub was a candidate for listing as a Threatened population under ESA, but in 2022 that proposal was withdrawn. At the state level, all three fish are listed as a species of concern, special concern, or endangered by two or more basin states. A multi-state conservation agreement, known as the three-species program, was signed in 2006. Conservation of the Flannelmouth Sucker is also covered under the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data and tools==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://streamsystem.org/index.php STReaM System online database]===&lt;br /&gt;
The STReaM System database provides public access to the data collected by both the [https://www.fws.gov/office/new-mexico-ecological-services/san-juan-river-basin-recovery-implementation-program San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program] and the [https://www.fws.gov/office/upper-colorado-river-endangered-fish-recovery-program Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program], including stocking records, catch and recatch data, site effort data, fish captures with and without pit tags, and locations of nonnative fish capture and removal. Free registration is required, using the “registration” link in the top right corner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)]===&lt;br /&gt;
Species Profiles include species listing status, maps of current range, federal register documents, species status assessments, recovery plans, critical habitat, and conservation plans. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/530 Razorback Sucker]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3531 Colorado Pikeminnow]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1377 Bonytail]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/E000 Humpback Chub]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/onlyinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional resources==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TanyaPetach</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>