View source for Metals and acid mine drainage

==Overview==

Heavy metal contamination in the Colorado River (including dissolved and particulate zinc, cadmium, lead, arsenic, copper, and iron)  is primarily concentrated in the headwater tributaries of the Upper Basin. Contamination is relatively wide-spread throughout these headwaters tributaries, ranging from tributaries of the Eagle, the Gunnison, the Animas, the East, and the Dolores Rivers; however, contamination rarely travels far downstream. The metal-rich geology in the Rocky Mountains creates natural background levels of metal contamination, which have then been exacerbated by 150 years of mining activities. Dissolved heavy metals require specific chemical conditions to persist (e.g., low pH) and thus do not often propagate into the mainstem of the Colorado River.

[[File:Earp_moreo_reservoirEvap.png|thumb|700px|Figure 1: The mixing zone of the Animas River (left) and Cement Creek (right). Water in Cement Creek is metal-rich, low-pH while water in the Animas River has low metal concentrations and near-neutral pH. The dilution of Cement Creek in the Animas River increases the pH of Cement Creek water, leading many of the dissolved metals to precipitate back into solid form, from solution. (Photo credit: U.S. Geological Survey). ]]

Sulfide-rich minerals, such as pyrite, react with oxygen and water to form sulfuric acid. The sulfuric acid can then leach metals from surrounding host rock and these dissolved metals can travel downstream. Most metals are soluble only at acidic pH meaning that these metals precipitate back into solid form at near-neutral pH; most metal-rich acidic waters are attenuated at confluences with cleaner streams that have higher pH.  
Mining activities often increase the surface area of sulfide minerals that are in contact with oxygen and water. Metal leaching due to mining-exacerbated sulfide weathering is referred to as acid mine drainage and is a major contributor to dissolved metals in headwater streams i. Much of the contamination from acid mine drainage in the headwaters of the Colorado River has persisted for decades and is likely to continue given the complexity of the situation. Limited cleanup funding, legal constraints surrounding the Superfund program, antiquated mining laws, mixed land-ownership, tenuous good-samaritan laws, and the perpetual nature of sulfide oxidation have limited the extent of mitigation. In particular, once surface disturbances cause additional sulfide minerals to be exposed to oxygen and water, stopping that sulfide oxidation is difficult, and solutions are costly.

Acid mine drainage in the Colorado River Basin gained notoriety following the Gold King Mine Spill in 2015 in Cement Creek, a tributary to the Animas River, which flows into the San Juan River and the Colorado River. During the Gold King Mine Spill, 3 million gallons of acid mine drainage were accidentally released following remediation efforts on a collapsed mine tunnel. Abandoned mines continuously leach acid mine drainage into Cement Creek and the spill volume was equivalent to the volume of acid mine drainage typically leaked in less than a week. However, since the spill happened abruptly, the acid mine drainage plume had severely concentrated metals and traveled farther downstream the Animas River than usual and the precipitating iron turned the stream a vibrant and disturbing orange color. The spill resulted in extensive litigation between the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Navajo Nation; following the Gold King Mine spill, the region was designated as an EPA superfund site.

==Relevance==
Metal contamination in headwater tributaries typically impacts local communities on these smaller streams; the Gold King Mine Spill was a notable exception. While metal contamination is insidious and poses many challenges to clean up efforts, extensive efforts are ongoing. Clean-up work carried out by the EPA, nonprofits, state and local organizations has improved metal concentrations in many reaches of headwaters streams in the Upper Colorado River. However, these improvements are complicated by continued sulfide mineral oxidation at abandoned mine sites and at modern mines continues to contribute metal contamination to headwater streams. 

==Data and tools==
<onlyinclude>
===[https://mrdata.usgs.gov/catalog/science.php?thcode=2&term=1724 USGS abandoned mine water quality database]===
The USGS abandoned mine and water quality database is hosted by the USGS and houses USGS publications, data releases, and relevant reports pertaining to the introduction of harmful substances into the environment from mines and tailings.

===[https://www.epa.gov/data EPA water quality database]===
The EPA reports and releases relevant data from acid mine drainage sites at which the EPA is involved. [https://www.epa.gov/goldkingmine/test2-data-gold-king-mine-response Specific pages] host data specifically relevant to the Gold King Mine spill (2015).

==Additional resources==

===[https://erams.com/catena/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Abandoned-Mine-Water-Quality-Study_06-01-17.pdf Colorado Abandoned Mines Water Quality Study]===
The Colorado Department of Natural Resources surveyed and sampled 145 abandoned mine sites with actively discharging water. These data are presented in a [https://erams.com/catena/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Abandoned-Mine-Water-Quality-Study_06-01-17.pdf 2017 report].